Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

Removal of Cu(II) and a PET Glitter Microplastic Surrogate by Alginate, Alginate–Opuntia, and Chitosan-Treated Alginate–Opuntia Beads

  1. 1BASIS Mesa

Abstract

The use of alginate-only beads, alginate–Opuntia (AO) beads, and chitosan-treated AO beads for the removal of Cu(II) and a PET glitter (a microplastic surrogate) from water has been investigated. Each bead type was made from the previous one by the addition of one component. Batch experiments were carried out in water containing glitter, Cu(II), or both, and AO beads soaked in dilute acetic acid without chitosan served as a control for the acid. The removal of Cu(II) in copper-only water was 45.71 ± 1.97%, 59.44 ± 2.28%, and 84.19 ± 2.65% for the alginate-only, AO, and chitosan-treated beads, respectively (mean ± SD, n = 12, 6 h, 140 rpm). Opuntia increased the Cu(II) removal by 13.72 percentage points and chitosan by a further 24.75 points (paired t-test, p < 0.001 for both, and p ≤ 0.0013 for the batch means). In the presence of 2.00 g of glitter, the chitosan-treated beads still removed about 84% of the Cu(II). Meanwhile, the glitter removal increased by about 7 points with Opuntia but changed by less than 0.25 points with chitosan (p = 0.648 and 0.231). No significant difference was found between the acid-soaked and the untreated AO beads. It can be concluded that Opuntia was responsible for the increase in glitter capture and chitosan for most of the increase in Cu(II) removal.

Related

  1. Synergistic engineering of bio-inspired magnetic alginate-chitosan interpenetrating double-network beads for rapid simultaneous capture of arsenic and phosphate from complex water systems
    Mohammad Albayari, Eman Fayad, Maha Alsunbul +3
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textHydrology & soilsEurope PMCPMC
  2. CTAB-functionalized clinoptilolite alginate microbeads for enhanced Congo Red adsorption: performance, kinetics and equilibrium analysis
    Aizad Farizi Mohd Sharoni, Nur Najeehah Mohd Nasir, Ashraf Azmi +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossref
  3. Decoupling Network Architecture and Sorption Mechanisms in Cellulose–Alginate and Carboxymethylcellulose–Alginate Hydrogels
    Paula Paulino Silva, Vinicius Augusto de Melo Gomes, Juliano Brisola +2
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Valorization of Beach-Cast Biomass from the Invasive Seaweed Rugulopteryx okamurae on the Moroccan Coast: A Comparative Assessment of Extraction Conditions for Sodium Alginate Recovery
    Khansae Kamal, Zahira Belattmania, Fouad Bentiss +4
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionOceanography & cryosphereHAL
  5. Sodium alginate-based eco-friendly nanocomposites for textile wastewater management
    Amina Sajjad, Saher Goher, Hassam Mehmood +5
    RSC AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BY 3.0Full textHydrology & soilsDOAJPMC
BibTeX
@misc{karakkattu2026removal,
  title = {{Removal of Cu(II) and a PET Glitter Microplastic Surrogate by Alginate, Alginate–Opuntia, and Chitosan-Treated Alginate–Opuntia Beads}},
  author = {Shilo Karakkattu},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15010268/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15010268/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Removal of Cu(II) and a PET Glitter Microplastic Surrogate by Alginate, Alginate–Opuntia, and Chitosan-Treated Alginate–Opuntia Beads
AU  - Shilo Karakkattu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15010268/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15010268/v1
AB  - The use of alginate-only beads, alginate–Opuntia (AO) beads, and chitosan-treated AO beads for the removal of Cu(II) and a PET glitter (a microplastic surrogate) from water has been investigated. Each bead type was made from the previous one by the addition of one component. Batch experiments were carried out in water containing glitter, Cu(II), or both, and AO beads soaked in dilute acetic acid without chitosan served as a control for the acid. The removal of Cu(II) in copper-only water was 45.71 ± 1.97%, 59.44 ± 2.28%, and 84.19 ± 2.65% for the alginate-only, AO, and chitosan-treated beads, respectively (mean ± SD, n = 12, 6 h, 140 rpm). Opuntia increased the Cu(II) removal by 13.72 percentage points and chitosan by a further 24.75 points (paired t-test, p < 0.001 for both, and p ≤ 0.0013 for the batch means). In the presence of 2.00 g of glitter, the chitosan-treated beads still removed about 84% of the Cu(II). Meanwhile, the glitter removal increased by about 7 points with Opuntia but changed by less than 0.25 points with chitosan (p = 0.648 and 0.231). No significant difference was found between the acid-soaked and the untreated AO beads. It can be concluded that Opuntia was responsible for the increase in glitter capture and chitosan for most of the increase in Cu(II) removal.
ER  -