Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDCirculation Journal

Changes in Remote Monitoring for Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices After a Reimbursement Revision ― An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis ―

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) enables early detection of abnormalities in cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), but implementation remains suboptimal. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 396,296 patients hospitalized for CIED implantation and evaluated changes after RM reimbursement revision using an interrupted time-series analysis. The proportion increased by 4.89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.71 to 6.06%) in the pacemaker implantation cohort, but no significant increase was observed in the implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy cohort (0.79%; 95% CI: -1.12 to 2.71%). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of reimbursement policy changes on RM adoption may differ according to the type of CIED.

Related

  1. Increase in Reimbursement Does Not Necessarily Place a Financial Burden on Patients ― Background Behind the Reimbursement Revision for Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Japan ―
    Takashi Ashihara
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  2. The impact of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes in defibrillator patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: An interrupted time series analysis
    Sandeep Chand, Barbara Torres, David M. Vickers +3
    Heart rhythm O2Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  3. TricValve System Implantation in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Multicentre Observational Study
    Kira Osipenko, Iuliana Coti, Paul Werner +26
    European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  4. Trajectory changes in psychosocial adaptation levels of patients after implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices and development of the intervention programme: a mixed-methods research protocol
    Meirong Chen, Minting Lu, Hui Huang +5
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  5. The hidden pause: Filtering of true prolonged asystole in implantable loop recorder monitoring platform by artificial intelligence.
    Mohammadali Habibi, Laura Kennedy Flynn, Advay Bhatt +2
    HeartRhythm case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{takegawa2026changes,
  title = {{Changes in Remote Monitoring for Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices After a Reimbursement Revision ― An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis ―}},
  author = {Koki Takegawa and Koshiro Kanaoka and Haruka Matsuura and Shoko Chishaki-Kawabata and Yoshitaka Iwanaga and Tetsuo Sasano and Yoshihiro Miyamoto},
  journal = {Circulation Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1253/circj.cj-26-0548},
  url = {https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/advpub/0/advpub_CJ-26-0548/_article},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Changes in Remote Monitoring for Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices After a Reimbursement Revision ― An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis ―
AU  - Koki Takegawa
AU  - Koshiro Kanaoka
AU  - Haruka Matsuura
AU  - Shoko Chishaki-Kawabata
AU  - Yoshitaka Iwanaga
AU  - Tetsuo Sasano
AU  - Yoshihiro Miyamoto
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/29
JO  - Circulation Journal
DO  - 10.1253/circj.cj-26-0548
UR  - https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/advpub/0/advpub_CJ-26-0548/_article
AB  - BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) enables early detection of abnormalities in cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), but implementation remains suboptimal. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 396,296 patients hospitalized for CIED implantation and evaluated changes after RM reimbursement revision using an interrupted time-series analysis. The proportion increased by 4.89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.71 to 6.06%) in the pacemaker implantation cohort, but no significant increase was observed in the implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy cohort (0.79%; 95% CI: -1.12 to 2.71%). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of reimbursement policy changes on RM adoption may differ according to the type of CIED.
SN  - 1347-4820
SN  - 1346-9843
ER  -