Evaluating policies and statutory instruments affecting Zimbabwe’s Pfumvudza/Intwasa conservation agriculture programme implementation
- 1Department of Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa
Abstract
This study evaluates the policies and statutory instruments influencing Zimbabwe’s Pfumvudza/Intwasa programme implementation in semi-arid communal areas of Gwanda district, examining whether policy frameworks adequately support climate resilience for smallholder farmers. Grounded in the sustainable development framework and climate resilience framework, the research employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design and surveyed 307 smallholder farmers in southwestern Zimbabwe, conducted 20 key informant interviews and held 16 focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS (v.30) with chi-square tests and descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were thematically coded using NVivo (v.14), with triangulation matrices integrating both datasets. Results reveal significant policy-practice disconnects. While 39% of respondents recognized the presidential input scheme, 26% reported no policy awareness. Most of the respondents (86%) perceived current policies as ineffective, with women significantly more likely than men to report inadequate policy support (χ2 = 13.83, p = 0.008). Implementation deficits including bureaucratic delays, politicized distribution, and weak quality controls systematically undermine programme effectiveness. Some farmers (35% of responses) prioritized water security interventions over current plot-level conservation practices, suggesting policy-practice misalignment. The study concludes that current frameworks build only short-term coping capacity, failing to develop the adaptive and transformative capacities needed for enduring climate resilience. The study recommends developing explicit sustainability frameworks with subsidy phase-out timelines, integrating water security with conservation agriculture policy, depoliticising input distribution, and institutionalising participatory governance platforms.
Related
- Conservation agriculture optimizes soil nitrogen stabilization and availability to crops under rice-based cropping
- Conservation agriculture buffers persistent carbon loss under warming by microbial adaptation
- Conservation agriculture strategies for soil health and carbon restoration in humid subtropical agri-food systems
- Revolutionizing drought defense: The water-plant-microbe synergy in climate-smart agriculture
- Biodiversity isn't measured in tons: Making sense of nature in the context of sustainable agriculture
BibTeX
@article{dube2026evaluating,
title = {{Evaluating policies and statutory instruments affecting Zimbabwe’s Pfumvudza/Intwasa conservation agriculture programme implementation}},
author = {Susan Samukele Dube and Munyaradzi Chitakira},
journal = {Discover Sustainability},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1007/s43621-026-04068-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04068-x},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Evaluating policies and statutory instruments affecting Zimbabwe’s Pfumvudza/Intwasa conservation agriculture programme implementation
AU - Susan Samukele Dube
AU - Munyaradzi Chitakira
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Discover Sustainability
DO - 10.1007/s43621-026-04068-x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04068-x
AB - This study evaluates the policies and statutory instruments influencing Zimbabwe’s Pfumvudza/Intwasa programme implementation in semi-arid communal areas of Gwanda district, examining whether policy frameworks adequately support climate resilience for smallholder farmers. Grounded in the sustainable development framework and climate resilience framework, the research employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design and surveyed 307 smallholder farmers in southwestern Zimbabwe, conducted 20 key informant interviews and held 16 focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS (v.30) with chi-square tests and descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were thematically coded using NVivo (v.14), with triangulation matrices integrating both datasets. Results reveal significant policy-practice disconnects. While 39% of respondents recognized the presidential input scheme, 26% reported no policy awareness. Most of the respondents (86%) perceived current policies as ineffective, with women significantly more likely than men to report inadequate policy support (χ2 = 13.83, p = 0.008). Implementation deficits including bureaucratic delays, politicized distribution, and weak quality controls systematically undermine programme effectiveness. Some farmers (35% of responses) prioritized water security interventions over current plot-level conservation practices, suggesting policy-practice misalignment. The study concludes that current frameworks build only short-term coping capacity, failing to develop the adaptive and transformative capacities needed for enduring climate resilience. The study recommends developing explicit sustainability frameworks with subsidy phase-out timelines, integrating water security with conservation agriculture policy, depoliticising input distribution, and institutionalising participatory governance platforms.
SN - 2662-9984
ER -