Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Can diffuse X-rays be important in driving photoionisation in molecular clouds?

Abstract

The ionisation balance in molecular clouds is regulated by several ionising sources, including cosmic rays, X-rays, and ultraviolet radiation. Their relative importance depends on the local physical conditions and on the shielding column density. We compute the contribution of the large-scale diffuse X-ray radiation field to the ionisation in molecular clouds in the absence of strong local X-ray sources, such as young stars. Our goal is to quantify its significance relative to the Galactic cosmic rays. Using measurements of diffuse X-ray emission from the first eROSITA all-sky survey, we estimate the depth-dependent X-ray ionisation rate in molecular clouds across different Galactic environments. We consider both the observed diffuse field and a deabsorbed field obtained by correcting for foreground Galactic attenuation using HI4PI line-of-sight column densities in a pixel-by-pixel framework. Diffuse Galactic X-rays are unlikely to dominate the ionisation balance in well-shielded molecular gas (NH > 5 × 1021 cm−2), where cosmic rays remain the primary ionising agent. At low column densities, the deabsorbed diffuse X-ray field produces ionisation rate of ζX ∼ 10−18s−1 at NH ∼ 1019cm−2, remaining below the lower end of Galactic cosmic ray ionisation rate (∼ 10−17 s−1). The X-ray contribution decreases rapidly with increasing shielding, falling to ζX∼10−19s−1 by NH∼1021cm−2 and to ζX ∼5×10−21s−1 by NH∼1022cm−2. Diffuse X-ray may therefore contribute to the thermal and chemical structure of low-extinction material and should be considered when interpreting ionisation tracers in diffuse or cloud-envelope environments.

Related

  1. Carbon addition as the dominant pathway for aromatic growth in dense molecular clouds
    Jean-Christophe Loison, Ugo Jacovella
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  2. From short-lived to long-lived clouds: Impact of star formation models on giant molecular cloud evolution in simulations of an NGC 300-like galaxy
    Daniel Han, Taysun Kimm, Cheonsu Kang +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  3. Gas phase Elemental abundances in Molecular cloudS (GEMS). XII. First look into the para-to-ortho ratio of c-C_3D_2 towards pre-stellar cores
    J. Ferrer Asensio, A. Fuente, E. Roueff +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  4. Metal-poor molecular clouds in dwarf galaxies at parsec-scale resolution
    L. K. Hunt, M. Heyer, U. Lisenfeld +17
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  5. Examining Turbulence in Galactic Molecular Clouds. II. Turbulence Cascade Beyond the Scale of Giant Molecular Clouds
    Yuehui Ma, Miaomiao Zhang, Hongchi Wang +5
    The Astrophysical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{makarenko2026diffuse,
  title = {{Can diffuse X-rays be important in driving photoionisation in molecular clouds?}},
  author = {E. I. Makarenko and A. V. Ivlev and S. Bialy and X. Zheng and B. A. L. Gaches and P. Caselli and M. Padovani and M. C. H. Yeung},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.02648},
  eprint = {2609.02648},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02648},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Can diffuse X-rays be important in driving photoionisation in molecular clouds?
AU  - E. I. Makarenko
AU  - A. V. Ivlev
AU  - S. Bialy
AU  - X. Zheng
AU  - B. A. L. Gaches
AU  - P. Caselli
AU  - M. Padovani
AU  - M. C. H. Yeung
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.02648
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02648
AB  - The ionisation balance in molecular clouds is regulated by several ionising sources, including cosmic rays, X-rays, and ultraviolet radiation. Their relative importance depends on the local physical conditions and on the shielding column density. We compute the contribution of the large-scale diffuse X-ray radiation field to the ionisation in molecular clouds in the absence of strong local X-ray sources, such as young stars. Our goal is to quantify its significance relative to the Galactic cosmic rays. Using measurements of diffuse X-ray emission from the first eROSITA all-sky survey, we estimate the depth-dependent X-ray ionisation rate in molecular clouds across different Galactic environments. We consider both the observed diffuse field and a deabsorbed field obtained by correcting for foreground Galactic attenuation using HI4PI line-of-sight column densities in a pixel-by-pixel framework. Diffuse Galactic X-rays are unlikely to dominate the ionisation balance in well-shielded molecular gas (N_H > 5 × 10^21 cm^−2), where cosmic rays remain the primary ionising agent. At low column densities, the deabsorbed diffuse X-ray field produces ionisation rate of ζ_X ∼ 10^−18s^−1 at N_H ∼ 10^19cm^−2, remaining below the lower end of Galactic cosmic ray ionisation rate (∼ 10^−17 s^−1). The X-ray contribution decreases rapidly with increasing shielding, falling to ζ_X∼10^−19s^−1 by N_H∼10^21cm^−2 and to ζ_X ∼5×10^−21s^−1 by N_H∼10^22cm^−2. Diffuse X-ray may therefore contribute to the thermal and chemical structure of low-extinction material and should be considered when interpreting ionisation tracers in diffuse or cloud-envelope environments.
ER  -