Quality‐of‐life and late effects after transabdominal cerclage: A nationwide matched cohort study
7 affiliations
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
- 2Department of Surgery Gødstrup Regional Hospital Denmark
- 3Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
- 4Department of Women and Children's Health St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London London UK
- 5Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus N Denmark
- 6DEFACTUM – Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region Aarhus N Denmark
- 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark
Abstract
Introduction: A transabdominal cerclage is inserted to prevent recurrent midtrimester loss and spontaneous preterm birth. The transabdominal cerclage often remains as a permanent foreign body for years. Synthetic materials within the abdomen, cesarean birth, and prior adverse pregnancy outcomes have each been associated with long‐term complications or poorer health‐related quality‐of‐life. However, the long‐term effects of a permanent transabdominal cerclage have not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate patient‐reported late effects and health‐related quality‐of‐life in Danish women who underwent transabdominal cerclage between 2004 and 2025.
Material and Methods: In this nationwide cohort study, women with a transabdominal cerclage were matched in a 1:1:1 ratio to two comparison groups: (1)women without transabdominal cerclage who had a cesarean birth, and (2)women without transabdominal cerclage who had a non‐instrumental vaginal birth and no prior cesarean birth. Participants completed validated questionnaires assessing quality‐of‐life, anxiety and depression, bladder discomfort, pelvic pain and sexual health. The primary outcome was the General Health scale in SF‐36. Domain‐ and total scale scores were compared between the groups using multiple linear regression. The study was pre‐registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06875401).
Results: Two hundred three women with a transabdominal cerclage, 90 with a cesarean section, and 98 with a vaginal birth participated. The mean General Health score did not differ between groups by a predefined minimally important difference of 10 points. Adjusted mean differences were − 4.0 points (95% CI ‐9.5–1.4) for women with cesarean birth and −0.6 (95% ‐CI‐6.2–4.9) for women with vaginal birth in comparison to the transabdominal cerclage group. Mental health, bladder discomfort, pelvic pain, and sexual health symptom burdens were similar between groups. Response rates were higher in the transabdominal cerclage group, which may have introduced selection bias. Cerclage‐related complications leading to suture removal after completed pregnancies were rare (3/203 women, 1.5%). Quality‐of‐life scores tended to be higher with longer time since cerclage procedure.
Conclusions: Permanent transabominal cerclage was not associated with poorer self‐reported general health compared with women without transabominal cerclage, regardless of mode of birth. These findings support that a permanent transabominal cerclage does not appear to have long‐term negative health effects.
Related
- Higher postoperative complication rates in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus undergoing surgical and obstetric procedures: a nationwide retrospective matched cohort study.
- Healthcare trajectories diverge years before Huntington disease is recorded in claims: a nationwide French matched cohort study
- Diabetes mellitus and risk of injury requiring medical care: a nationwide population-based matched cohort study in Taiwan.
- Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Lower 90-Day Inpatient Readmission Than Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged 65-75 Years: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Readmissions Database Study
- Early Amniocentesis Versus Transabdominal Chorionic Villus Sampling for Early Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis: A 15-Year Prospective Cohort Study.
BibTeX
@article{hansen2026qualityoflife,
title = {{Quality‐of‐life and late effects after transabdominal cerclage: A nationwide matched cohort study}},
author = {Lea Kirstine Hansen and Julie Glavind and Andrew H. Shennan and Niels Uldbjerg and Stina Lou and Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel and Pernille Tine Jensen},
journal = {Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1111/aogs.70324},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70324},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Quality‐of‐life and late effects after transabdominal cerclage: A nationwide matched cohort study
AU - Lea Kirstine Hansen
AU - Julie Glavind
AU - Andrew H. Shennan
AU - Niels Uldbjerg
AU - Stina Lou
AU - Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel
AU - Pernille Tine Jensen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/04
JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
DO - 10.1111/aogs.70324
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70324
AB - Introduction: A transabdominal cerclage is inserted to prevent recurrent midtrimester loss and spontaneous preterm birth. The transabdominal cerclage often remains as a permanent foreign body for years. Synthetic materials within the abdomen, cesarean birth, and prior adverse pregnancy outcomes have each been associated with long‐term complications or poorer health‐related quality‐of‐life. However, the long‐term effects of a permanent transabdominal cerclage have not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate patient‐reported late effects and health‐related quality‐of‐life in Danish women who underwent transabdominal cerclage between 2004 and 2025. Material and Methods: In this nationwide cohort study, women with a transabdominal cerclage were matched in a 1:1:1 ratio to two comparison groups: (1)women without transabdominal cerclage who had a cesarean birth, and (2)women without transabdominal cerclage who had a non‐instrumental vaginal birth and no prior cesarean birth. Participants completed validated questionnaires assessing quality‐of‐life, anxiety and depression, bladder discomfort, pelvic pain and sexual health. The primary outcome was the General Health scale in SF‐36. Domain‐ and total scale scores were compared between the groups using multiple linear regression. The study was pre‐registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06875401). Results: Two hundred three women with a transabdominal cerclage, 90 with a cesarean section, and 98 with a vaginal birth participated. The mean General Health score did not differ between groups by a predefined minimally important difference of 10 points. Adjusted mean differences were − 4.0 points (95% CI ‐9.5–1.4) for women with cesarean birth and −0.6 (95% ‐CI‐6.2–4.9) for women with vaginal birth in comparison to the transabdominal cerclage group. Mental health, bladder discomfort, pelvic pain, and sexual health symptom burdens were similar between groups. Response rates were higher in the transabdominal cerclage group, which may have introduced selection bias. Cerclage‐related complications leading to suture removal after completed pregnancies were rare (3/203 women, 1.5%). Quality‐of‐life scores tended to be higher with longer time since cerclage procedure. Conclusions: Permanent transabominal cerclage was not associated with poorer self‐reported general health compared with women without transabominal cerclage, regardless of mode of birth. These findings support that a permanent transabominal cerclage does not appear to have long‐term negative health effects.
SN - 0001-6349
SN - 1600-0412
ER -