Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
184,584 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Dynamic Risk Stratification for Short-Term Deterioration After Acute Stroke: Incremental Value of Radiology-Report-Derived Neuroimaging Phenotypes Beyond Dynamic ICU States, a retrospective cohort study with temporal validation

Abstract

BackgroundPrediction models after stroke increasingly add neuroimaging information to bedside data. Whether findings documented in radiology reports improve short-term risk stratification beyond a patients evolving physiological state is unknown.

MethodsWe studied 4,827 adults with acute ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage or subarachnoid haemorrhage in MIMIC-IV (2008-2019). At eight landmarks from 6 to 48 hours after ICU admission, models ranked patients by their risk of deterioration or death within 24 hours. The baseline model combined demographic and clinical characteristics, a previously validated dynamic ICU state representation, and the physiology, treatment and imaging status at each landmark. A locally run language model extracted imaging phenotypes from 6,992 head CT and MRI reports; three phenotypes and four location categories met a pre-specified reliability criterion for automated extraction in independent validation and entered the model. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of events captured among the 10% of patients ranked highest at each landmark, in temporal validation (2017-2019; 8,923 patient-landmarks, 666 events).

ResultsAmong the highest-ranked 10%, adding imaging phenotypes captured no additional event (348 of 666 with and without them): a difference of 0.00 percentage points (95% CI -2.20 to +2.01). Discrimination (AUROC 0.855 vs 0.849), calibration and net benefit were similar. No prespecified sensitivity analysis, stroke subtype or availability-adjusted analysis showed statistically supported incremental capture. In a post hoc redundancy analysis, imaging phenotypes improved capture when added to demographic and clinical characteristics alone (+12.91 points, 7.54 to 17.81), but this gain was no longer evident once the dynamic state representation was included.

ConclusionsNeuroimaging phenotypes derived from routine radiology reports were associated with short-term deterioration, but we found no evidence that they added risk stratification value beyond the dynamic ICU state and contemporaneous physiology.

Related

  1. Preoperative risk stratification for postoperative inflammatory–nutritional deterioration after colorectal cancer surgery: an interpretable machine learning study
    Yinchao Zhang, Yingkun Hu, Xinke Cao +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Incremental Value of Radiation Dose for Prognostic Stratification Beyond Performance Status in Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases
    Advances in radiation oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Neuroimaging markers associated with early neurological deterioration in acute isolated pontine infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feng Guo, Xiaorong Liu, Jia Chen +1
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeurologyCrossref
  4. Clinical Phenotypes, Neuroimaging, and Outcomes in Prolonged and Persistent Non-Motor Migraine Aura: A Systematic Review and Episode-Level Synthesis
    Assel Meiramova, Bayan Ainabekova, Yernar Tursynbet +1
    Neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Endocannabinoid System Genes in Dementia: A Systematic Mendelian Randomization Study of Functional Variants and Tissue-Specific Expression Across Clinical, Molecular, and Neuroimaging Phenotypes
    S. Javidnia, V. Karhunen, B. Woolf +4
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textHuman geneticsmedRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{p2026dynamic,
  title = {{Dynamic Risk Stratification for Short-Term Deterioration After Acute Stroke: Incremental Value of Radiology-Report-Derived Neuroimaging Phenotypes Beyond Dynamic ICU States, a retrospective cohort study with temporal validation}},
  author = {P. LEI and Y. XU and Y. ZHANG and N. RAY},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.08.26365059},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.26365059v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Dynamic Risk Stratification for Short-Term Deterioration After Acute Stroke: Incremental Value of Radiology-Report-Derived Neuroimaging Phenotypes Beyond Dynamic ICU States, a retrospective cohort study with temporal validation
AU  - P. LEI
AU  - Y. XU
AU  - Y. ZHANG
AU  - N. RAY
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.08.26365059
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.26365059v1
AB  - BackgroundPrediction models after stroke increasingly add neuroimaging information to bedside data. Whether findings documented in radiology reports improve short-term risk stratification beyond a patients evolving physiological state is unknown.  MethodsWe studied 4,827 adults with acute ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage or subarachnoid haemorrhage in MIMIC-IV (2008-2019). At eight landmarks from 6 to 48 hours after ICU admission, models ranked patients by their risk of deterioration or death within 24 hours. The baseline model combined demographic and clinical characteristics, a previously validated dynamic ICU state representation, and the physiology, treatment and imaging status at each landmark. A locally run language model extracted imaging phenotypes from 6,992 head CT and MRI reports; three phenotypes and four location categories met a pre-specified reliability criterion for automated extraction in independent validation and entered the model. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of events captured among the 10% of patients ranked highest at each landmark, in temporal validation (2017-2019; 8,923 patient-landmarks, 666 events).  ResultsAmong the highest-ranked 10%, adding imaging phenotypes captured no additional event (348 of 666 with and without them): a difference of 0.00 percentage points (95% CI -2.20 to +2.01). Discrimination (AUROC 0.855 vs 0.849), calibration and net benefit were similar. No prespecified sensitivity analysis, stroke subtype or availability-adjusted analysis showed statistically supported incremental capture. In a post hoc redundancy analysis, imaging phenotypes improved capture when added to demographic and clinical characteristics alone (+12.91 points, 7.54 to 17.81), but this gain was no longer evident once the dynamic state representation was included.  ConclusionsNeuroimaging phenotypes derived from routine radiology reports were associated with short-term deterioration, but we found no evidence that they added risk stratification value beyond the dynamic ICU state and contemporaneous physiology.
ER  -