Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC pregnancy and childbirth

Integrating probiotics into a one-day diabetes clinic: outcomes in gestational diabetes.

  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, No. 16, Tangu North Street, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China.
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, No. 16, Tangu North Street, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China. [email protected].
  3. 3Department of Internal Medicine, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, No. 16, Tangu North Street, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China. [email protected].

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effects of a one-day diabetes clinic management model combined with probiotic supplementation in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods

A total of 682 patients diagnosed with GDM who received prenatal care at our hospital between January 2023 and May 2024 were enrolled in this study. All participants underwent oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) screening at 24-28 weeks of gestation and attended the one-day diabetes clinic management program. Patients were divided into a probiotic group and a control group based on oral probiotic administration. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were applied to analyze intergroup differences and temporal trends in blood glucose, lipid metabolism, and inflammatory markers. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine maternal and neonatal perinatal outcomes.Results

After PSM, no statistically significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses revealed significant group-by-time interaction effects for fasting blood glucose (FPG) and C-reactive protein (CRP). After Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple testing, lower levels of FPG and CRP were observed in the probiotic group at several follow-up time points, with group differences emerging gradually over the intervention period. Triglycerides showed only a nominally significant group effect without adjustment. Total gestational weight change differed statistically between the two groups. GEE analyses indicated weak crude associations between probiotic supplementation, maternal group B streptococcal colonization (GBS), and neonatal jaundice; however, these associations were no longer statistically significant following FDR correction.Conclusion

Probiotic supplementation combined with one-day diabetes clinic management was associated with lower FPG and CRP levels among women with GDM. Weak associations between probiotic use, maternal GBS colonization and neonatal jaundice disappeared after adjustment for multiple testing, and these findings can only be used to generate hypotheses. As an observational study, this analysis cannot confirm clinical benefits of probiotics. All observed findings represent exploratory associations, which require further verification in randomized controlled trials.Trial registration

This observational study was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500100649) on April 11, 2025. Registration was delayed because the research team was initially unaware that registration is mandatory for observational clinical studies.

Related

  1. Remote monitoring for gestational diabetes: neonatal and maternal outcomes compared to usual care
    Anne-Jet Jansen, Laura Kooij, Lia Wijnberger +3
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0General medicineCrossref
  2. Preconceptional Risk Factors Associated With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Case-Control Study
    Dharitri Swain, Priyadarshini T., Tania Mishra +5
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. A risk assessment model for gestational diabetes mellitus integrating maternal demographics and hematological indices in Thai women.
    Thaveesak Sai-Ong, Donrawee Waeyeng, Tanaporn Khamphaya +4
    BMC pregnancy and childbirthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Trends, disparities, and pregnancy outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in North West London: A nine-year population-based cohort study
    Sara Sousi, Sevasti Panagiota Glynou, Sabrina Hyman +4
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsDOAJ
  5. Temporal patterns and adverse pregnancy outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus in Hebei Province, China, 2017–2023: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Li Liu, Suxin Liu, Liyan Du +2
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Obstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{wang2026integrating,
  title = {{Integrating probiotics into a one-day diabetes clinic: outcomes in gestational diabetes.}},
  author = {Wei Wang and Nana Cai and Min Ma and Yanmin Cao and Hong Li and Jie Liu and Youxia Zhou and Sijia Liang},
  journal = {BMC pregnancy and childbirth},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12884-026-09866-9},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42875750},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Integrating probiotics into a one-day diabetes clinic: outcomes in gestational diabetes.
AU  - Wei Wang
AU  - Nana Cai
AU  - Min Ma
AU  - Yanmin Cao
AU  - Hong Li
AU  - Jie Liu
AU  - Youxia Zhou
AU  - Sijia Liang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/26
JO  - BMC pregnancy and childbirth
DO  - 10.1186/s12884-026-09866-9
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42875750
AB  - Objective  To investigate the effects of a one-day diabetes clinic management model combined with probiotic supplementation in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods  A total of 682 patients diagnosed with GDM who received prenatal care at our hospital between January 2023 and May 2024 were enrolled in this study. All participants underwent oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) screening at 24-28 weeks of gestation and attended the one-day diabetes clinic management program. Patients were divided into a probiotic group and a control group based on oral probiotic administration. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were applied to analyze intergroup differences and temporal trends in blood glucose, lipid metabolism, and inflammatory markers. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine maternal and neonatal perinatal outcomes.Results  After PSM, no statistically significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses revealed significant group-by-time interaction effects for fasting blood glucose (FPG) and C-reactive protein (CRP). After Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple testing, lower levels of FPG and CRP were observed in the probiotic group at several follow-up time points, with group differences emerging gradually over the intervention period. Triglycerides showed only a nominally significant group effect without adjustment. Total gestational weight change differed statistically between the two groups. GEE analyses indicated weak crude associations between probiotic supplementation, maternal group B streptococcal colonization (GBS), and neonatal jaundice; however, these associations were no longer statistically significant following FDR correction.Conclusion  Probiotic supplementation combined with one-day diabetes clinic management was associated with lower FPG and CRP levels among women with GDM. Weak associations between probiotic use, maternal GBS colonization and neonatal jaundice disappeared after adjustment for multiple testing, and these findings can only be used to generate hypotheses. As an observational study, this analysis cannot confirm clinical benefits of probiotics. All observed findings represent exploratory associations, which require further verification in randomized controlled trials.Trial registration  This observational study was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500100649) on April 11, 2025. Registration was delayed because the research team was initially unaware that registration is mandatory for observational clinical studies.
SN  - 1471-2393
ER  -