Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Communications Biology

Divergent processing strategies for auditory sequence recognition in humans and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)

Abstract

Deriving sequential information from complex sounds is a challenge for auditory systems, yet it remains unclear whether humans and nonhuman species integrate multidimensional cues or prioritize a single dimension when processing multidimensional input. We investigated how humans and zebra finches ( Taeniopygia guttata ) process concurrent acoustic cues using an identical behavioural paradigm with complex-tone sequences. By presenting probe stimuli that selectively preserved or disrupted either pitch or formant trajectory, we quantified these processing strategies. We show that zebra finches employ an additive integration strategy, treating pitch and formant trajectories as complementary components of a unified auditory pattern. In contrast, humans exhibit a dominant reliance on pitch. Experience further modulates this bias, with trained human listeners recruiting secondary cues to preserve learned relational structure when pitch is unreliable. These findings imply a cross-species divergence in auditory representation, suggesting that auditory processing is shaped by an interplay of species-specific priorities and experience-dependent functional substitution.

Related

  1. Bio-Inspired Auditory Processing: Coupling Parallel Resonate-and-Fire Dynamics with Ternary Recurrent Networks for Speech Recognition
    Pavlos Poulos, Katelyn Sadorf, Themos Stafylakis +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencearXiv
  2. Editorial: Tinnitus in relation to auditory processing: unravelling complex relationships
    Takwa Gabr, Prashanth Prabhu, Haúla Haider
    Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
  3. Sociality predicts enhanced auditory thresholds and binaural hearing processing across rodent species
    Luberson Joseph, Fabio A. Machado, Elizabeth A. McCullagh
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
  4. Pattern recognition receptors and divergent disease severity in zoonotic viral infections
    Daniel S. Mansur, Brooke Trowbridge, José Henrique M. Oliveira +2
    Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ImmunologyCrossref
  5. Walking delays auditory processing in humans alongside a global shift in aperiodic neural activity
    X. Chen, S. Chen, X. Zhang +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{ning2026divergent,
  title = {{Divergent processing strategies for auditory sequence recognition in humans and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)}},
  author = {Zhi-Yuan Ning and Jiaxin Li and Carel ten Cate and Henkjan Honing},
  journal = {Communications Biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s42003-026-11035-9},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-026-11035-9},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Divergent processing strategies for auditory sequence recognition in humans and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)
AU  - Zhi-Yuan Ning
AU  - Jiaxin Li
AU  - Carel ten Cate
AU  - Henkjan Honing
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Communications Biology
DO  - 10.1038/s42003-026-11035-9
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-026-11035-9
AB  - Deriving sequential information from complex sounds is a challenge for auditory systems, yet it remains unclear whether humans and nonhuman species integrate multidimensional cues or prioritize a single dimension when processing multidimensional input. We investigated how humans and zebra finches ( Taeniopygia guttata ) process concurrent acoustic cues using an identical behavioural paradigm with complex-tone sequences. By presenting probe stimuli that selectively preserved or disrupted either pitch or formant trajectory, we quantified these processing strategies. We show that zebra finches employ an additive integration strategy, treating pitch and formant trajectories as complementary components of a unified auditory pattern. In contrast, humans exhibit a dominant reliance on pitch. Experience further modulates this bias, with trained human listeners recruiting secondary cues to preserve learned relational structure when pitch is unreliable. These findings imply a cross-species divergence in auditory representation, suggesting that auditory processing is shaped by an interplay of species-specific priorities and experience-dependent functional substitution.
SN  - 2399-3642
ER  -