Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Interpreting the stacked kinetic SZ signal II: the degeneracy between satellite galaxies and baryonic feedback

Abstract

The kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) signal stacked around a galaxy sample traces the gas around halos and is a powerful probe of baryonic feedback. Its interpretation, however, depends on the satellite galaxies in the sample. Using the FLAMINGO hydrodynamical simulations and DESI-like samples of luminous red galaxies (LRGs), bright galaxies survey (BGS), and emission-line galaxies (ELGs), we show that satellites and feedback have similar effects: both suppress the small-scale signal. This degeneracy arises because stacking on satellites, which are offset from the centre of their host haloes, mimics the extended gas distribution produced by feedback. Although satellites make up only 20-30% of each sample, they account for 50-80% of the signal because they occupy more massive halos than centrals; thus their imprint on the stacked profiles can be as large as that of feedback. At the precision of current DESI×ACT data, neglecting satellites in the modelling biases the inferred gas fractions low, by up to a factor of two, and overestimates the feedback strength, particularly for the LRG and BGS samples. Remaining agnostic about the satellite population avoids this bias but reduces the constraining power, so robust constraints would require knowing the satellite fraction to better than 10%, for instance from lensing and clustering data of the same galaxy samples. Finally, a further contribution from satellites will become statistically significant with upcoming surveys: satellites trace the anisotropic gas distribution around their host haloes, an effect that contributes 10% of the signal, and will likely require simulation-based models to capture.

Related

  1. The VariableTNG project: Mass-dependent regulation of galaxy morphology by baryonic feedback
    Yikai Liu, Hong Guo, Volker Springel +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsGalaxiesCrossref
  2. A two-component profile of baryonic feedback: hydrostatic and diffuse gas
    Kaitlyn Shavelle, Jared Siegel, Leah Bigwood +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyarXiv
  3. Baryonic feedback and intrinsic alignments in profile: a frequentist view of DES Y3 cosmic shear
    Anoma Ganguly, Elisabeth Krause, Tanvi Karwal +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyarXiv
  4. Constraining Baryonic Feedback at z∼ 1 with the Hα Luminosity Function
    Ivan Rapoport, Vincent Desjacques, Ehud Behar +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  5. Calibrating baryonic feedback with weak lensing and fast radio bursts
    Robert Reischke, Dennis Neumann, Klara Bertmann +2
    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY25 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{ondaromallea2026interpreting,
  title = {{Interpreting the stacked kinetic SZ signal II: the degeneracy between satellite galaxies and baryonic feedback}},
  author = {Lurdes Ondaro-Mallea and Boryana Hadzhiyska and Raul E. Angulo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.17200},
  eprint = {2610.17200},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17200},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Interpreting the stacked kinetic SZ signal II: the degeneracy between satellite galaxies and baryonic feedback
AU  - Lurdes Ondaro-Mallea
AU  - Boryana Hadzhiyska
AU  - Raul E. Angulo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.17200
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17200
AB  - The kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) signal stacked around a galaxy sample traces the gas around halos and is a powerful probe of baryonic feedback. Its interpretation, however, depends on the satellite galaxies in the sample. Using the FLAMINGO hydrodynamical simulations and DESI-like samples of luminous red galaxies (LRGs), bright galaxies survey (BGS), and emission-line galaxies (ELGs), we show that satellites and feedback have similar effects: both suppress the small-scale signal. This degeneracy arises because stacking on satellites, which are offset from the centre of their host haloes, mimics the extended gas distribution produced by feedback. Although satellites make up only 20-30% of each sample, they account for 50-80% of the signal because they occupy more massive halos than centrals; thus their imprint on the stacked profiles can be as large as that of feedback. At the precision of current DESI×ACT data, neglecting satellites in the modelling biases the inferred gas fractions low, by up to a factor of two, and overestimates the feedback strength, particularly for the LRG and BGS samples. Remaining agnostic about the satellite population avoids this bias but reduces the constraining power, so robust constraints would require knowing the satellite fraction to better than 10%, for instance from lensing and clustering data of the same galaxy samples. Finally, a further contribution from satellites will become statistically significant with upcoming surveys: satellites trace the anisotropic gas distribution around their host haloes, an effect that contributes 10% of the signal, and will likely require simulation-based models to capture.
ER  -