Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Advanced Impression Techniques for Complex Maxillofacial Tissue Defects.

  1. 1Prosthodontics, Amrita School of Dentistry, Kochi, IND.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the various traditional, digital, and hybrid impression workflows in maxillofacial prosthodontics. It addresses the research question of how modern digital advancements overcome the limitations in accuracy, material waste, and data storage that are inherent in conventional techniques for complex intraoral and extraoral defects. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Ninety-three English-language articles evaluating impression workflows for extraoral and intraoral prostheses were identified and analyzed. While conventional materials remain highly accessible and clinically useful, digital workflows, utilizing intraoral scanning, three-dimensional photogrammetry, and computer-aided workflows, offer superior precision for complex defects, streamline data storage, and allow virtual modifications. For implant-supported prostheses, both workflows demonstrate comparable accuracy. Hybrid approaches combining both techniques maximize outcomes in highly challenging scenarios. Although digital technologies present higher initial infrastructure costs and require specialized training, upcoming advancements in artificial intelligence-assisted design are expected to further transform the field. Digital and hybrid workflows significantly advance maxillofacial prosthodontics by improving precision and data management over traditional methods. Clinicians must understand the distinct indications and limitations of both approaches to deliver individualized, efficient, and optimized rehabilitative care tailored to diverse patient needs.

Related

  1. Case Report: Endoscopic removal of a giant complex gastric trichobezoar: an alternative strategy using combined techniques
    Hai-Hua Zhou, Jian-Ping Xu, Rui-Qiang Li +5
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Arthroscopic Reduction Techniques for Complex Metacarpophalangeal Joint Dislocation With Sesamoid Bone Entrapment: A Case Series
    Kwan Hung Moya Tsui, Ruize Yang, Wai Wang Chau +3
    Journal of hand surgery global onlinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Surgical technique of nonvascularized rectus fascia transplantation for complex thoracic defects
    Margherita Brivio, Ewout Muylle, Guillaume Hendrickx +12
    JTCVS techniquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Optimization-enhanced machine failure classification using critical sensor features and hybrid learning models with advanced optimization techniques
    Jinqin Tang, Junling Chai, Jinkun Dai +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  5. A Contemporary Review of Resectability and Treatment Strategies for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Part 2-Advanced Surgical Techniques, Conversion Strategies, and the Expanding Boundaries of Treatment.
    Jennifer A Kalil, René Adam, Nicholas Meti +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{sinha2026advanced,
  title = {{Advanced Impression Techniques for Complex Maxillofacial Tissue Defects.}},
  author = {Sakshi Sinha and Anna S Babu and Krishnapriya V N and Manju V},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.116905},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928868},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Advanced Impression Techniques for Complex Maxillofacial Tissue Defects.
AU  - Sakshi Sinha
AU  - Anna S Babu
AU  - Krishnapriya V N
AU  - Manju V
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.116905
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928868
AB  - This study aims to evaluate the various traditional, digital, and hybrid impression workflows in maxillofacial prosthodontics. It addresses the research question of how modern digital advancements overcome the limitations in accuracy, material waste, and data storage that are inherent in conventional techniques for complex intraoral and extraoral defects. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Ninety-three English-language articles evaluating impression workflows for extraoral and intraoral prostheses were identified and analyzed. While conventional materials remain highly accessible and clinically useful, digital workflows, utilizing intraoral scanning, three-dimensional photogrammetry, and computer-aided workflows, offer superior precision for complex defects, streamline data storage, and allow virtual modifications. For implant-supported prostheses, both workflows demonstrate comparable accuracy. Hybrid approaches combining both techniques maximize outcomes in highly challenging scenarios. Although digital technologies present higher initial infrastructure costs and require specialized training, upcoming advancements in artificial intelligence-assisted design are expected to further transform the field. Digital and hybrid workflows significantly advance maxillofacial prosthodontics by improving precision and data management over traditional methods. Clinicians must understand the distinct indications and limitations of both approaches to deliver individualized, efficient, and optimized rehabilitative care tailored to diverse patient needs.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -