Learning research systems: A conceptual framework and formative implementation case.
- 1Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
- 2Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Abstract
Learning Health Systems (LHSs) enable data-driven improvement in clinical care. However, research processes that generate this evidence remain fragmented, limiting systematic learning across study portfolios and contributing to persistent translational inefficiencies. We introduce the Learning Research System (LRS) as a sociotechnical extension of the LHS that leverages LHS infrastructure to render research operations measurable, reusable, and governable across studies, positioning research as an object of continuous learning. Using targeted literature synthesis and supplementary searches, we traced the emergence of the LRS from foundational LHS scholarship and developed five core capabilities as proposed maturity indicators: cross-study measurement, reuse of cohorts and analytic assets, portfolio-level governance, feedback-enabled workflow optimization, and integration of research outputs into clinical and operational improvement. We illustrate the distinction between LHS and LRS roles across the NCATS Translational Science Spectrum. Finally, we applied the capabilities to a formative case at the University of Nebraska Medical Center through an institutional environmental scan, mapping them as indicators of emerging LRS maturity from an existing LHS. The LRS provides a framework for evaluating research-process learning, reducing fragmentation across translational stages, and addressing selected translational discontinuities, such as early-stage "valley of death" barriers between discovery and human studies.
Related
- CFIR-guided formative implementation research to co-design a supervised toothbrushing programme through Anganwadi centres in Kerala, India
- National formative evaluation of the implementation of Martha’s Rule in English acute providers: an ethnographic study protocol
- Toward a conceptual framework of economic security for health research: a scoping review
- Perceptions of child weight and health among Hispanic mothers in Arkansas: formative research for the La CASA trial
- Designing evaluation infrastructure for psychedelic harm reduction at events: a methodological framework with formative mixed-methods field application
BibTeX
@article{lienemann2026learning,
title = {{Learning research systems: A conceptual framework and formative implementation case.}},
author = {Laura Lienemann and Carrie Bailey and A Jerrod Anzalone and Matthew Rizzo},
journal = {Journal of clinical and translational science},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1017/cts.2026.10801},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43011275},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Learning research systems: A conceptual framework and formative implementation case.
AU - Laura Lienemann
AU - Carrie Bailey
AU - A Jerrod Anzalone
AU - Matthew Rizzo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/21
JO - Journal of clinical and translational science
DO - 10.1017/cts.2026.10801
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43011275
AB - Learning Health Systems (LHSs) enable data-driven improvement in clinical care. However, research processes that generate this evidence remain fragmented, limiting systematic learning across study portfolios and contributing to persistent translational inefficiencies. We introduce the Learning Research System (LRS) as a sociotechnical extension of the LHS that leverages LHS infrastructure to render research operations measurable, reusable, and governable across studies, positioning research as an object of continuous learning. Using targeted literature synthesis and supplementary searches, we traced the emergence of the LRS from foundational LHS scholarship and developed five core capabilities as proposed maturity indicators: cross-study measurement, reuse of cohorts and analytic assets, portfolio-level governance, feedback-enabled workflow optimization, and integration of research outputs into clinical and operational improvement. We illustrate the distinction between LHS and LRS roles across the NCATS Translational Science Spectrum. Finally, we applied the capabilities to a formative case at the University of Nebraska Medical Center through an institutional environmental scan, mapping them as indicators of emerging LRS maturity from an existing LHS. The LRS provides a framework for evaluating research-process learning, reducing fragmentation across translational stages, and addressing selected translational discontinuities, such as early-stage "valley of death" barriers between discovery and human studies.
SN - 2059-8661
ER -