Virtual Reality as a Preparatory Educational Tool in Non-VR Trauma Simulation for Medical Students: A Qualitative Content Analysis.
- 1Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 85 Sweden.
- 2Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87 Sweden.
Abstract
Background
Simulation-based medical education (SMBE) is a well-established and effective method for clinical training, yet its implementation is often resource-intensive and logistically demanding. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising educational tool, offering immersive, multisensory simulations that may support both procedural and cognitive skill development. In educational context where students must prepare for complex scenarios, VR may serve as a preparatory educational tool. Thus, exploring such simulation formats is well justified to enhance training outcomes.Aim
To explore medical students' experiences of using VR as preparation for a subsequent non-VR trauma simulation.Methods
Thirty-two medical students in their seventh semester who were assigned to use a VR application prior to a scheduled non-VR trauma simulation, participated in this study. Eight focus-group interviews were conducted immediately after the trauma simulation. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.Results
The findings were categorised into four categories: Perceived educational effect, Practical user experience, Comparison of VR and other educational forms, and Areas for improvement in the VR application. The students described the VR application as an engaging and motivating learning method that supported autonomous preparation. However, the VR application was not perceived as sufficient to replace traditional educational formats. Key limitations included low interactivity, limited realism, and lack of cognitive flexibility. The participants proposed improvements, such as dynamic patient responses, expanded roles, and increased complexity in order to better reflect clinical practice.Conclusions
The VR application shows potential as a flexible and accessible preparatory complement to SMBE. However, in its current form, it was not perceived as a suitable standalone learning method. The identified limitations relate to the design and scope of the specific VR application studied rather than to inherent limitations of VR technology. Student perspectives offer important insights into how preparatory VR may support motivation, early cognitive rehearsal and familiarization with simulation workflows, and should be actively considered in the development of VR-based educational tools.
Related
- A Multicomponent Simulation-Based Program Incorporating Ultrasound for Lumbar Puncture Training in Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Educational Trial
- Virtual Operating Theatre Simulation: Development and Evaluation of a Web-Based Learning Tool for Medical Students
- Practice report on a credit-based internship for Medical Sciences students: Examining educational effects through fundamental skills for working adults and qualitative content analysis.
- Exploring nursing students' communication experiences with artificial intelligence-supported virtual patients: a qualitative study.
- Learning facial muscle anatomy using virtual reality simulation: a randomized controlled study among medical students in Iraq
BibTeX
@article{gyllencreutz2026virtual,
title = {{Virtual Reality as a Preparatory Educational Tool in Non-VR Trauma Simulation for Medical Students: A Qualitative Content Analysis.}},
author = {L Gyllencreutz and M Byström and K Jonsson and M M Haapamäki},
journal = {Medical science educator},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1007/s40670-026-02822-4},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968737},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Virtual Reality as a Preparatory Educational Tool in Non-VR Trauma Simulation for Medical Students: A Qualitative Content Analysis.
AU - L Gyllencreutz
AU - M Byström
AU - K Jonsson
AU - M M Haapamäki
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/17
JO - Medical science educator
DO - 10.1007/s40670-026-02822-4
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968737
AB - Background Simulation-based medical education (SMBE) is a well-established and effective method for clinical training, yet its implementation is often resource-intensive and logistically demanding. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising educational tool, offering immersive, multisensory simulations that may support both procedural and cognitive skill development. In educational context where students must prepare for complex scenarios, VR may serve as a preparatory educational tool. Thus, exploring such simulation formats is well justified to enhance training outcomes.Aim To explore medical students' experiences of using VR as preparation for a subsequent non-VR trauma simulation.Methods Thirty-two medical students in their seventh semester who were assigned to use a VR application prior to a scheduled non-VR trauma simulation, participated in this study. Eight focus-group interviews were conducted immediately after the trauma simulation. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.Results The findings were categorised into four categories: Perceived educational effect, Practical user experience, Comparison of VR and other educational forms, and Areas for improvement in the VR application. The students described the VR application as an engaging and motivating learning method that supported autonomous preparation. However, the VR application was not perceived as sufficient to replace traditional educational formats. Key limitations included low interactivity, limited realism, and lack of cognitive flexibility. The participants proposed improvements, such as dynamic patient responses, expanded roles, and increased complexity in order to better reflect clinical practice.Conclusions The VR application shows potential as a flexible and accessible preparatory complement to SMBE. However, in its current form, it was not perceived as a suitable standalone learning method. The identified limitations relate to the design and scope of the specific VR application studied rather than to inherent limitations of VR technology. Student perspectives offer important insights into how preparatory VR may support motivation, early cognitive rehearsal and familiarization with simulation workflows, and should be actively considered in the development of VR-based educational tools.
SN - 2156-8650
ER -