Dissociation Between Instrumented Mobility and Self-Reported Function in Adults Aged 70 Years or Older After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Longitudinal Study Using an Inertial Sensor and the WOMAC.
8 affiliations
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University Evangelica of Goiás, Anápolis 75083-515, GO, Brazil.
- 2Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Municipal Hospital of Aparecida de Goiânia (HMAP), Aparecida de Goiânia 74936-600, GO, Brazil.
- 3Health Sciences Program, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo 01221-020, SP, Brazil.
- 4Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiânia 74605-050, GO, Brazil.
- 5Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, SP, Brazil.
- 6Human Movement and Rehabilitation Post Graduation Program, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Anápolis 75083-515, GO, Brazil.
- 7Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
- 8IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, San Giuseppe Hospital, Piancavallo, 28823 Verbania, Italy.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reliably reduces pain and improves self-reported function, yet objective mobility may remain impaired in older adults. We examined the relationship between inertial-sensor-based mobility and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in adults aged 70 years or older after unilateral TKA. Methods: In this observational longitudinal study, 25 participants were assessed at up to three postoperative time points (M1, first available assessment; M2, 2024 follow-up; M3, 2025 follow-up). Outcomes were the instrumented Timed Up and Go (TUG) test with segmented turning variables, the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), spatiotemporal gait variables recorded with a trunk-mounted inertial measurement unit, and the WOMAC. Paired changes in the instrumented outcomes were tested with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests under Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate (FDR) control and are reported with bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs); longitudinal change in the WOMAC was not tested, because the response format used at the first assessment could not be established from the available records, so WOMAC scores are used only within time point; associations used Spearman correlations with bootstrap CIs and leave-one-out influence diagnostics. Individual-level agreement was examined by standardising each of three externally validated objective outcomes against the inverted WOMAC total score within time point and classifying discordance across a range of cut-offs. Observed changes in the instrumented outcomes were benchmarked against published minimal detectable change (MDC) values. Results: Participants were 75.56 ± 4.00 years old and 64.0% were women; 14 were reassessed at M2 and 2 at M3. No instrumented global outcome changed after FDR adjustment, and the median changes in total TUG time (+0.07 s) and 2MWT distance (+12.80 m) remained below published MDC₉₅ values (2.27 s and 14.96 m). Mid-turn duration shortened by a median of 0.80 s (95% CI -0.93 to -0.28) and mid-turn peak and mean angular velocities increased by 16.55°/s (8.00 to 30.10) and 7.40°/s (1.30 to 14.15), all with FDR-adjusted p = 0.036. At M2, the WOMAC total score was inversely associated with walking speed (rho = -0.762, 95% CI -0.973 to -0.307), cadence (rho = -0.761) and 2MWT distance (rho = -0.644); these three associations retained their sign and significance in every leave-one-out refit and changed little on adjustment for age, body mass index or postoperative duration, whereas all M1 associations were weak. Between 42.9% and 57.1% of participants fell outside a ±0.5 standardised concordance band at M2 depending on which validated outcome was used, with no consistent asymmetry in either direction, and the estimated prevalence ranged from 7.1% to 85.7% across plausible cut-offs. Conclusions: Group-level association between patient-reported and instrumented outcomes coexists with frequent individual-level discordance, but the magnitude of that discordance is not stably estimable in a cohort of this size. WOMAC scores should not be assumed to substitute for objective mobility testing after TKA, and confirmation in larger prospective cohorts is required.
Related
- Late glenosphere–baseplate Morse taper dissociation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a patient-specific Vault Reconstruction System glenoid: a case report
- Catastrophic acetabular wear following polyethylene liner dissociation with locking-tab damage after total hip arthroplasty: a case report
- Longitudinal Changes in Self-Esteem and Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After Keratopigmentation for Unilateral Corneal Opacity
- CT-based simulation of impingement-free mechanical hip motion after unilateral total hip arthroplasty.
- Pressure-modulated dural repair during unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery: technique description and preliminary feasibility report.
BibTeX
@article{trindade2026dissociation,
title = {{Dissociation Between Instrumented Mobility and Self-Reported Function in Adults Aged 70 Years or Older After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Longitudinal Study Using an Inertial Sensor and the WOMAC.}},
author = {Andrei Machado Viegas da Trindade and Leonardo Pinheiro Rezende and Helder Rocha da Silva Araújo and Junichiro Sado and Karla Cristina Naves de Carvalho and Heytor Mendes Camargo Costa and Rafael Abrantes Jacinto and Allana Palma Fabricante and Veronica Cimolin and Rodolfo Borges Parreira and Claudia Santos Oliveira},
journal = {Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jfmk11040420},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924699},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Dissociation Between Instrumented Mobility and Self-Reported Function in Adults Aged 70 Years or Older After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Longitudinal Study Using an Inertial Sensor and the WOMAC.
AU - Andrei Machado Viegas da Trindade
AU - Leonardo Pinheiro Rezende
AU - Helder Rocha da Silva Araújo
AU - Junichiro Sado
AU - Karla Cristina Naves de Carvalho
AU - Heytor Mendes Camargo Costa
AU - Rafael Abrantes Jacinto
AU - Allana Palma Fabricante
AU - Veronica Cimolin
AU - Rodolfo Borges Parreira
AU - Claudia Santos Oliveira
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
JO - Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology
DO - 10.3390/jfmk11040420
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924699
AB - Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reliably reduces pain and improves self-reported function, yet objective mobility may remain impaired in older adults. We examined the relationship between inertial-sensor-based mobility and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in adults aged 70 years or older after unilateral TKA. Methods: In this observational longitudinal study, 25 participants were assessed at up to three postoperative time points (M1, first available assessment; M2, 2024 follow-up; M3, 2025 follow-up). Outcomes were the instrumented Timed Up and Go (TUG) test with segmented turning variables, the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), spatiotemporal gait variables recorded with a trunk-mounted inertial measurement unit, and the WOMAC. Paired changes in the instrumented outcomes were tested with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests under Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate (FDR) control and are reported with bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs); longitudinal change in the WOMAC was not tested, because the response format used at the first assessment could not be established from the available records, so WOMAC scores are used only within time point; associations used Spearman correlations with bootstrap CIs and leave-one-out influence diagnostics. Individual-level agreement was examined by standardising each of three externally validated objective outcomes against the inverted WOMAC total score within time point and classifying discordance across a range of cut-offs. Observed changes in the instrumented outcomes were benchmarked against published minimal detectable change (MDC) values. Results: Participants were 75.56 ± 4.00 years old and 64.0% were women; 14 were reassessed at M2 and 2 at M3. No instrumented global outcome changed after FDR adjustment, and the median changes in total TUG time (+0.07 s) and 2MWT distance (+12.80 m) remained below published MDC₉₅ values (2.27 s and 14.96 m). Mid-turn duration shortened by a median of 0.80 s (95% CI -0.93 to -0.28) and mid-turn peak and mean angular velocities increased by 16.55°/s (8.00 to 30.10) and 7.40°/s (1.30 to 14.15), all with FDR-adjusted p = 0.036. At M2, the WOMAC total score was inversely associated with walking speed (rho = -0.762, 95% CI -0.973 to -0.307), cadence (rho = -0.761) and 2MWT distance (rho = -0.644); these three associations retained their sign and significance in every leave-one-out refit and changed little on adjustment for age, body mass index or postoperative duration, whereas all M1 associations were weak. Between 42.9% and 57.1% of participants fell outside a ±0.5 standardised concordance band at M2 depending on which validated outcome was used, with no consistent asymmetry in either direction, and the estimated prevalence ranged from 7.1% to 85.7% across plausible cut-offs. Conclusions: Group-level association between patient-reported and instrumented outcomes coexists with frequent individual-level discordance, but the magnitude of that discordance is not stably estimable in a cohort of this size. WOMAC scores should not be assumed to substitute for objective mobility testing after TKA, and confirmation in larger prospective cohorts is required.
SN - 2411-5142
ER -