Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Dual Boundary Condition Inference: A Two-Boundary Product Rule and Its Implications

Abstract

Many inference problems are constrained from two sides: forward information and a second constraint on outcomes. Dual Boundary Condition Inference (DBCI) multiplies them and renormalises. The rule is not new: it is the product-of-experts form and the unit-exponent member of the logarithmic-pooling family. The paper contributes a classification and reducibility characterisation. The algebra does not fix the exponent at which the inputs combine: given the statistic log p_fwd + log p_bwd, which already builds in the product form, maximum entropy supplies the family (p_fwd p_bwd)^lambda and selects no member. If the inputs are read as two equally weighted opinions, three requirements select lambda = 1/2: unanimity preservation, consistency under a common Bayesian update, and minimal symmetric Kullback-Leibler divergence. If they are read as separately applied factors, two requirements select lambda = 1: a neutral second input must leave the first unchanged, and an update to one input must pass through unchanged. For a rank-one intermediate projective measurement, the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule realises this form with no extra parameter. Every positive exponent orders outcomes identically, so the choice is invisible to picking the likeliest outcome, but not to scoring a class by total mass. Under the relevant identifications, the same product form gives Bayes' rule, while a final effect proportional to the identity returns the ordinary forward Born probabilities. The second result is a Two-Boundary Reducibility Criterion: DBCI factors through the forward boundary exactly when the effective backward boundary, up to positive rescaling, does. So a fixed prior or model-fixed structural constraint adds no distinctions between cases sharing the same forward boundary, though it may encode substantial information and still materially affect the result.

Related

  1. On the gauge invariant boundary condition in open XXZ chains: SoV bases, elementary blocks and overlaps
    G Niccoli, Véronique Terras
    HALPreprintLicence not statedMathematical physicsHigh-energy & particle physicsHAL
  2. Energy diffusion in a pinned harmonic chain with free boundary condition and interactions of increasing range
    Yipeng Lu, Wei Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsProbabilityarXiv
  3. Yau-type gradient estimates for p-harmonic functions on Riemannian manifolds with boundary under Dirichlet boundary condition
    Bingqi Liu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Selective boundary condition reduction via learned error gating
    Daniel Fernández, Dominik Penk, Dominik Riedelbauch
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Sharp asymptotics for a transport model with a nonlocal condition of the Fisher-KPP type at the boundary
    Grégory Faye, Jean-Michel Roquejoffre, Mingmin Zhang
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsHALarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{razo2026dual,
  title = {{Dual Boundary Condition Inference: A Two-Boundary Product Rule and Its Implications}},
  author = {Luis Razo and Eliahu Cohen},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.27120},
  eprint = {2609.27120},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27120},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Dual Boundary Condition Inference: A Two-Boundary Product Rule and Its Implications
AU  - Luis Razo
AU  - Eliahu Cohen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.27120
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27120
AB  - Many inference problems are constrained from two sides: forward information and a second constraint on outcomes. Dual Boundary Condition Inference (DBCI) multiplies them and renormalises. The rule is not new: it is the product-of-experts form and the unit-exponent member of the logarithmic-pooling family. The paper contributes a classification and reducibility characterisation. The algebra does not fix the exponent at which the inputs combine: given the statistic log p_fwd + log p_bwd, which already builds in the product form, maximum entropy supplies the family (p_fwd p_bwd)^lambda and selects no member. If the inputs are read as two equally weighted opinions, three requirements select lambda = 1/2: unanimity preservation, consistency under a common Bayesian update, and minimal symmetric Kullback-Leibler divergence. If they are read as separately applied factors, two requirements select lambda = 1: a neutral second input must leave the first unchanged, and an update to one input must pass through unchanged. For a rank-one intermediate projective measurement, the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule realises this form with no extra parameter. Every positive exponent orders outcomes identically, so the choice is invisible to picking the likeliest outcome, but not to scoring a class by total mass. Under the relevant identifications, the same product form gives Bayes' rule, while a final effect proportional to the identity returns the ordinary forward Born probabilities. The second result is a Two-Boundary Reducibility Criterion: DBCI factors through the forward boundary exactly when the effective backward boundary, up to positive rescaling, does. So a fixed prior or model-fixed structural constraint adds no distinctions between cases sharing the same forward boundary, though it may encode substantial information and still materially affect the result.
ER  -