Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCMedicine

Development and internal validation of a baseline prediction model for ≥10-point Oswestry Disability Index improvement by episode end among adults receiving outpatient physical therapy for low back pain : A retrospective cohort study

  1. 1Rehabilitation Department, Ministry of the National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Low back pain outcomes after outpatient physical therapy are heterogeneous. This retrospective single-center cohort prediction-model study aimed to develop and internally validate a parsimonious baseline model using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and STarT Back risk category to predict ≥10-point ODI improvement by routine episode end and assess whether additional baseline variables improve prediction. The hospital data team supplied 400 adult low back pain episodes with baseline and final ODI available. After eligibility exclusions, 391 episodes with complete ODI and STarT Back data comprised the primary cohort; the extended model used 356 complete cases. ≥10-point ODI improvement occurred from baseline to the final recorded physical therapy visit; episode duration was variable (median 31 days [interquartile range 25–63], range 10–95). Model Development and Internal Validation: The primary model included baseline ODI and STarT Back risk category. Internal validation used 2000 bootstrap resamples with optimism correction; nested bootstrap resampling quantified uncertainty around corrected performance. Overall, 236/391 (60.4%) achieved ≥10-point ODI improvement. Baseline ODI was associated with higher odds of improvement (aOR 1.046; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.027–1.066), whereas high versus low STarT Back risk was associated with lower odds (aOR 0.291; 95% CI, 0.157–0.539). Apparent AUC was 0.666 (95% CI, 0.612–0.719) and Brier score 0.216. Optimism-corrected AUC was 0.657 (95% CI, 0.607–0.722), Brier score 0.220 (0.200–0.233), calibration slope 0.959 (0.925–0.990), and intercept 0.018 (−0.011 to 0.041). The calibration curve showed localized miscalibration. Baseline ODI and STarT Back risk provided modest internally validated prediction of episode-end ODI improvement. The baseline-ODI association may reflect mathematical coupling, regression to the mean, and differential opportunity to achieve the threshold. The model does not estimate causal treatment benefit and requires external validation and local calibration. This prediction-model study was not prospectively registered.

Related

  1. Development and internal validation of an exploratory clinical prediction model for MRI-defined white matter injury in moderate-to-late preterm infants: a single-center retrospective study
    Translational pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Development and Internal Validation of a Preintubation Prediction Model for Postintubation Hypotension in Trauma Patients Undergoing Emergency Endotracheal Intubation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Chanatthee Kitsiripant, Komet Thongkhao, Osaree Akaraborworn +1
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for diagnosing nephrotic syndrome in adults: a retrospective diagnostic prediction study
    Xiaoyang Dong, Jing Nie, Yi Yan
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Development and Internal Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Visual Impairment Progression in Elderly Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
    Haiming Liang, Pinzhang Hu, Liu Qin +1
    International journal of general medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Development and Internal Validation of a Retrospective Prediction Model for Fungal Infections in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Xiaolan Chen, Mingyan Wu, Jingjing Wang +2
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{temraz2026development,
  title = {{Development and internal validation of a baseline prediction model for ≥10-point Oswestry Disability Index improvement by episode end among adults receiving outpatient physical therapy for low back pain : A retrospective cohort study}},
  author = {Yazeed Temraz and Ali Sahari and Faisal Alotaibi and Shouq Almutairi and Ahmed Hamami and Amal Alsaad and Rahaf Bin Salamah and Fay Almehrej},
  journal = {Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1097/md.0000000000051283},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13727176},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and internal validation of a baseline prediction model for ≥10-point Oswestry Disability Index improvement by episode end among adults receiving outpatient physical therapy for low back pain : A retrospective cohort study
AU  - Yazeed Temraz
AU  - Ali Sahari
AU  - Faisal Alotaibi
AU  - Shouq Almutairi
AU  - Ahmed Hamami
AU  - Amal Alsaad
AU  - Rahaf Bin Salamah
AU  - Fay Almehrej
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Medicine
DO  - 10.1097/md.0000000000051283
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13727176
AB  - Low back pain outcomes after outpatient physical therapy are heterogeneous. This retrospective single-center cohort prediction-model study aimed to develop and internally validate a parsimonious baseline model using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and STarT Back risk category to predict ≥10-point ODI improvement by routine episode end and assess whether additional baseline variables improve prediction. The hospital data team supplied 400 adult low back pain episodes with baseline and final ODI available. After eligibility exclusions, 391 episodes with complete ODI and STarT Back data comprised the primary cohort; the extended model used 356 complete cases. ≥10-point ODI improvement occurred from baseline to the final recorded physical therapy visit; episode duration was variable (median 31 days [interquartile range 25–63], range 10–95). Model Development and Internal Validation: The primary model included baseline ODI and STarT Back risk category. Internal validation used 2000 bootstrap resamples with optimism correction; nested bootstrap resampling quantified uncertainty around corrected performance. Overall, 236/391 (60.4%) achieved ≥10-point ODI improvement. Baseline ODI was associated with higher odds of improvement (aOR 1.046; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.027–1.066), whereas high versus low STarT Back risk was associated with lower odds (aOR 0.291; 95% CI, 0.157–0.539). Apparent AUC was 0.666 (95% CI, 0.612–0.719) and Brier score 0.216. Optimism-corrected AUC was 0.657 (95% CI, 0.607–0.722), Brier score 0.220 (0.200–0.233), calibration slope 0.959 (0.925–0.990), and intercept 0.018 (−0.011 to 0.041). The calibration curve showed localized miscalibration. Baseline ODI and STarT Back risk provided modest internally validated prediction of episode-end ODI improvement. The baseline-ODI association may reflect mathematical coupling, regression to the mean, and differential opportunity to achieve the threshold. The model does not estimate causal treatment benefit and requires external validation and local calibration. This prediction-model study was not prospectively registered.
SN  - 0304-5412
SN  - 1536-5964
SN  - 0025-7974
ER  -