Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
184,584 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Patient experience in National digital health platforms: Evidence from patient-generated feedback in Saudi Arabia

  1. 1Department of Information Systems, College of Computer Sciences and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

National digital health platforms are becoming fundamental components of modern healthcare delivery; however, patient experience is commonly assessed using overall ratings or sentiment analysis, providing limited understanding of the specific dimensions that influence digital healthcare quality and service improvement. This study aimed to develop a multidimensional framework for understanding patient experience in a national digital health platform, examine variation across healthcare services, investigate changes over time, and identify evidence-based improvement priorities. A qualitative analysis was conducted using 97,034 Google Play reviews of Sehhaty, the Saudi national digital health platform, posted between 2019 and 2026. Reviews were analyzed using an inductive coding approach to develop a patient experience framework, followed by comparative analyses across healthcare services and longitudinal analyses across successive stages of platform development. Nine patient experience dimensions were identified. Patient experience differed considerably across healthcare services, indicating that improvement priorities were service-specific rather than uniform across the platform. Longitudinal analyses showed a shift from predominantly technical concerns during early deployment toward challenges involving service accessibility, integration, continuity of care, as the platform matured. These findings enabled the identification of service-specific priorities for improving digital healthcare delivery. Patient experience in national digital health platforms is multidimensional, service-dependent, and evolves alongside platform maturity. The proposed framework extends approaches based primarily on ratings or sentiment by transforming large-scale patient-generated feedback into actionable evidence for healthcare quality improvement and continuous evaluation of patient-centered digital health services.

Related

  1. Atlas of Proteomic Technologies: an evidence-based framework for selecting and combining commercial proteomics platforms
    C. D. Whelan, K. Smith-Byrne
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  2. “The patient’s interests must come first”: French general practitioners’ experience of initiating testosterone therapy for trans people against national regulations, a qualitative study
    Alex Weil, Emmanuel Allory, Sidonie Chhor +2
    International Journal of Transgender HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral biologyHAL
  3. Answering clinicians' questions over trial evidence tables with verifiable, feedback-driven language models
    M. Roy Choudhury, S. Roy Chowdhury, S. Sahoo +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  4. How does supervisor support shape PhD students’ learning experience? Evidence from the Nature Careers 2025 Global PhD Survey
    Nuo Ya Li, Hanjie Zhang, Junqi Wang +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthPLOS
  5. Superior Frontal Gyrus Cortical Thickness Mediates the Association Between Openness to Experience and Theory of Mind: Evidence from the Human Connectome Project
    B. Akar, U. Atasever
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{albesher2026patient,
  title = {{Patient experience in National digital health platforms: Evidence from patient-generated feedback in Saudi Arabia}},
  author = {Abdulmohsen Saud Albesher},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360416},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360416},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Patient experience in National digital health platforms: Evidence from patient-generated feedback in Saudi Arabia
AU  - Abdulmohsen Saud Albesher
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360416
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360416
AB  - National digital health platforms are becoming fundamental components of modern healthcare delivery; however, patient experience is commonly assessed using overall ratings or sentiment analysis, providing limited understanding of the specific dimensions that influence digital healthcare quality and service improvement. This study aimed to develop a multidimensional framework for understanding patient experience in a national digital health platform, examine variation across healthcare services, investigate changes over time, and identify evidence-based improvement priorities. A qualitative analysis was conducted using 97,034 Google Play reviews of Sehhaty, the Saudi national digital health platform, posted between 2019 and 2026. Reviews were analyzed using an inductive coding approach to develop a patient experience framework, followed by comparative analyses across healthcare services and longitudinal analyses across successive stages of platform development. Nine patient experience dimensions were identified. Patient experience differed considerably across healthcare services, indicating that improvement priorities were service-specific rather than uniform across the platform. Longitudinal analyses showed a shift from predominantly technical concerns during early deployment toward challenges involving service accessibility, integration, continuity of care, as the platform matured. These findings enabled the identification of service-specific priorities for improving digital healthcare delivery. Patient experience in national digital health platforms is multidimensional, service-dependent, and evolves alongside platform maturity. The proposed framework extends approaches based primarily on ratings or sentiment by transforming large-scale patient-generated feedback into actionable evidence for healthcare quality improvement and continuous evaluation of patient-centered digital health services.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -