Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Benchmarking batch-effect correction in clinical bead-based multiplex immunoassays: a framework and web tool for cytokine and soluble immune checkpoint data

2 more authors
13 affiliations
  1. 1Research Unit, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Barrualde-Galdakao Integrated Health Organization, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital
  2. 2Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research
  3. 3Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS)
  4. 4The Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital
  5. 5Tumour Immunology Laboratory, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital
  6. 6Digestive Surgery Service, La Paz University Hospital
  7. 7Digestive Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  8. 8Translational Research and Innovation in Surgery Group, La Paz University Hospital
  9. 9CORE Laboratory, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
  10. 10BioBizkaia Health Research Institute
  11. 11Faculty of Health Sciences, UNIE University
  12. 12Immunomodulation Laboratory, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital
  13. 13CIBER of Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES)

Abstract

Background: Batch effects represent a major source of non-biological variability in clinical bead-based multiplex immunoassays (BBMIs), particularly when samples are processed across different analytical days and when measurements include a substantial proportion of values at or near the limit of detection (LOD).

Methods: Here, we developed and evaluated a comparative framework for reducing inter-batch variability in plasma cytokines with the Essential Cytokines Panel and soluble immune checkpoints (sICs) measurement with the Immune Checkpoint Panel. We also implemented this workflow in a freely accessible R Shiny-based web application that enables interactive batch-effect correction, visualization of correction performance, and export of harmonized datasets. Twenty-five proteins were quantified in 127 clinical samples processed across three analytical days: day 1, n = 26; day 2, n = 72; and day 3, n = 29. Seven batch-correction approaches were evaluated: median-centering, ComBat , and five methods from the batchtma R package: btma_simple , btma_standardize , btma_ipw , btma_quantreg and btma_quantnorm . Each method was assessed under two preprocessing strategies: log ₂ (x+1) transformation and analysis of raw concentrations expressed in pg/mL values. Correction performance was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Kruskal-Wallis test, and inter-batch coefficient of variation (CV).

Results: Before correction, ICC values were 0.207 for the Essential Cytokines Panel and 0.362 for the Immune Checkpoint Panel; furthermore, 13/13 and 12/12 markers, respectively, showed significant inter-day differences. btma_quantnorm achieved the largest and most consistent improvements across both panels and preprocessing strategies, reducing mean ICC values to ≤0.004 corresponding to a ≥98.1% reduction. After correction, only 0–1 markers retained significant Kruskal-Wallis results, and btma_quantnorm yielded the lowest inter-day CV for the Immune Checkpoint Panel (80.9%). Importantly, this method does not rely on normality assumptions and showed stable performance across the analytical workflows evaluated.

Conclusion: These findings support btma_quantnorm as a practical batch-correction approach for clinical BBMI dataset affected by inter-batch variability and LOD-related distributional constraints. The accompanying web-based tool translates this benchmarking framework into an accessible resource for applying, comparing and evaluating batch-correction in multiplex immunoassay datasets.

Related

  1. CRISPR-dPCR: A unified multiplex digital PCR framework for quantitative characterization of targeted knock-in
    M. Launspach, L. O. Raab, V. Glaser +13
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  2. scArchon: a scalable benchmarking framework for assessing single-cell perturbation models
    Jean Radig, Robin Droit, Daria Doncevic +5
    Genome biologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text9 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
  3. VHH-Bench: A Benchmarking Framework for Evaluating Nanobody–Antigen Complex Predictions Across CDR3 Conformations
    Nehad El Salamouni, Qiang Zhu, Haibo Yu
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYMolecular biology & gene regulationChemRxiv
  4. meth-SemiCancer2: a cancer subtyping framework leveraging domain adaptation with contrastive learning for batch effect correction in DNA methylation profiles
    Joung Min Choi, Heejoon Chae
    BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationDOAJ
  5. Multiplex navigation of global regulatory networks (MINR) in yeast for improved ethanol tolerance and production
    Rongming Liu, Liya Liang, Alaksh Choudhury +5
    Metabolic EngineeringPeer-reviewedLicence not stated40 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationHAL
BibTeX
@article{aguirrelarracoechea2026benchmarking,
  title = {{Benchmarking batch-effect correction in clinical bead-based multiplex immunoassays: a framework and web tool for cytokine and soluble immune checkpoint data}},
  author = {Urko Aguirre-Larracoechea and Laura Hurtado-Navarro and Julia del Prado-Montero and Ramón Cantero-Cid and Eloisa Urrechaga-Igartua and Verónica Terrón-Arcos and Jesús Fernández-Felipe and Laura Córdoba and José G. Rigor-Pérez and Rebeca Abad-Moret and Esteban Díaz-Serrano and Roberto Lozano-Rodríguez and Carlos del Fresno and Eduardo López-Collazo},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1944271},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1944271/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Benchmarking batch-effect correction in clinical bead-based multiplex immunoassays: a framework and web tool for cytokine and soluble immune checkpoint data
AU  - Urko Aguirre-Larracoechea
AU  - Laura Hurtado-Navarro
AU  - Julia del Prado-Montero
AU  - Ramón Cantero-Cid
AU  - Eloisa Urrechaga-Igartua
AU  - Verónica Terrón-Arcos
AU  - Jesús Fernández-Felipe
AU  - Laura Córdoba
AU  - José G. Rigor-Pérez
AU  - Rebeca Abad-Moret
AU  - Esteban Díaz-Serrano
AU  - Roberto Lozano-Rodríguez
AU  - Carlos del Fresno
AU  - Eduardo López-Collazo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1944271
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1944271/full
AB  - Background: Batch effects represent a major source of non-biological variability in clinical bead-based multiplex immunoassays (BBMIs), particularly when samples are processed across different analytical days and when measurements include a substantial proportion of values at or near the limit of detection (LOD).  Methods: Here, we developed and evaluated a comparative framework for reducing inter-batch variability in plasma cytokines with the Essential Cytokines Panel and soluble immune checkpoints (sICs) measurement with the Immune Checkpoint Panel. We also implemented this workflow in a freely accessible R Shiny-based web application that enables interactive batch-effect correction, visualization of correction performance, and export of harmonized datasets. Twenty-five proteins were quantified in 127 clinical samples processed across three analytical days: day 1, n = 26; day 2, n = 72; and day 3, n = 29. Seven batch-correction approaches were evaluated: median-centering, ComBat , and five methods from the batchtma R package: btma_simple , btma_standardize , btma_ipw , btma_quantreg and btma_quantnorm . Each method was assessed under two preprocessing strategies: log ₂ (x+1) transformation and analysis of raw concentrations expressed in pg/mL values. Correction performance was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Kruskal-Wallis test, and inter-batch coefficient of variation (CV).  Results: Before correction, ICC values were 0.207 for the Essential Cytokines Panel and 0.362 for the Immune Checkpoint Panel; furthermore, 13/13 and 12/12 markers, respectively, showed significant inter-day differences. btma_quantnorm achieved the largest and most consistent improvements across both panels and preprocessing strategies, reducing mean ICC values to ≤0.004 corresponding to a ≥98.1% reduction. After correction, only 0–1 markers retained significant Kruskal-Wallis results, and btma_quantnorm yielded the lowest inter-day CV for the Immune Checkpoint Panel (80.9%). Importantly, this method does not rely on normality assumptions and showed stable performance across the analytical workflows evaluated.  Conclusion: These findings support btma_quantnorm as a practical batch-correction approach for clinical BBMI dataset affected by inter-batch variability and LOD-related distributional constraints. The accompanying web-based tool translates this benchmarking framework into an accessible resource for applying, comparing and evaluating batch-correction in multiplex immunoassay datasets.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -