Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Lower Bounds for Nonconvex-Concave Minimax Optimization

Abstract

We study lower bounds on the first-order oracle complexity of smooth nonconvex-concave minimax optimization. We consider objectives f that are jointly L-smooth in the primal and dual variables (x,y), concave in y, and whose primal value function Φ(x) := maxy∈𝒴 f(x,y) satisfies the initial-gap condition Φ(0)−infx∈𝒳Φ(x)≤ ΔΦ, with a bounded dual domain satisfying diam(𝒴)≤ D𝒴. We measure stationarity by the norm of the gradient of the Moreau envelope of Φ+ι𝒳 with parameter 1/(2L). We prove that any deterministic zero-respecting first-order algorithm requires Ω(L2D𝒴ΔΦε−3) oracle evaluations to find an ε-stationary point. Under an unbiased stochastic first-order oracle with bounded variance, any stochastic zero-respecting algorithm requires Ω(L3D𝒴2ΔΦε−6) oracle evaluations. The same lower bounds hold when ΔΦ is replaced by the initial primal-dual gap 𝒢0. These deterministic and stochastic lower bounds match the corresponding upper bounds of [14] and [29], respectively, up to a logarithmic factor in the deterministic setting.

Related

  1. Tight Lower Bounds for Stochastic Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimization
    Siqi Zhang, Qilong Wu, Junchi Yang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Lower Bounds for Stochastic First-Order Algorithms with Variance Reduction in Nonconvex--Concave Minimax Optimization
    Jiayi Song, Zi Xu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  3. Tight Stochastic Condition-Number Dependence in Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimization
    Qihao Zhou
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Near-Optimal Complexity of Finite-Sum Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimization
    Qihao Zhou
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Envelope Cubic Regularized Newton Method for Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimization
    Qihao Zhou, Lesi Chen, Luo Luo +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{wu2026lower,
  title = {{Lower Bounds for Nonconvex-Concave Minimax Optimization}},
  author = {Qilong Wu and Zhihao Gu and Junchi Yang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.14233},
  eprint = {2609.14233},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14233},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Lower Bounds for Nonconvex-Concave Minimax Optimization
AU  - Qilong Wu
AU  - Zhihao Gu
AU  - Junchi Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/13
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.14233
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14233
AB  - We study lower bounds on the first-order oracle complexity of smooth nonconvex-concave minimax optimization. We consider objectives f that are jointly L-smooth in the primal and dual variables (x,y), concave in y, and whose primal value function Φ(x) := max_y∈𝒴 f(x,y) satisfies the initial-gap condition Φ(0)−inf_x∈𝒳Φ(x)≤ Δ_Φ, with a bounded dual domain satisfying diam(𝒴)≤ D_𝒴. We measure stationarity by the norm of the gradient of the Moreau envelope of Φ+ι_𝒳 with parameter 1/(2L). We prove that any deterministic zero-respecting first-order algorithm requires Ω(L^2D_𝒴Δ_Φε^−3) oracle evaluations to find an ε-stationary point. Under an unbiased stochastic first-order oracle with bounded variance, any stochastic zero-respecting algorithm requires Ω(L^3D_𝒴^2Δ_Φε^−6) oracle evaluations. The same lower bounds hold when Δ_Φ is replaced by the initial primal-dual gap 𝒢_0. These deterministic and stochastic lower bounds match the corresponding upper bounds of [14] and [29], respectively, up to a logarithmic factor in the deterministic setting.
ER  -