Respiration–action coupling and intentional binding in a Libet clock paradigm
Abstract
Interoception, the physiological sensing of internal bodily states, has been proposed to contribute to the sense of self. However, empirical research that directly investigates interoceptive contributions to the sense of agency remains limited. Based on the observed synchronisation between respiratory phase and the initiation of voluntary action, we implemented the Libet clock task to test the hypothesis that the respiratory phase would modulate intentional binding (IB), a temporal binding phenomenon often used as an implicit measure related to agency. Additionally, we aimed to replicate respiration–action synchronisation and to examine exploratory cardiac-phase effects on binding. The overall key-binding effect was small and did not reach statistical significance, whereas tone binding was significant. Neither key nor tone binding showed reliable respiratory-phase modulation, although respiration–action synchronisation was replicated. Bayesian model comparisons strongly favoured models in which binding did not vary with respiratory phase. For cardiac phase, a frequentist mixed-effects model suggested phase-dependent modulation of key binding, but Bayesian model comparison did not support including cardiac-phase interactions. Together, these findings show that respiration–action coupling was present in the task but was not accompanied by detectable respiratory-phase modulation of intentional binding; the cardiac finding should be considered exploratory.
Related
- The petal identity gene PhDEF has a major binding and regulatory action in the epidermis
- The Neurophysiology of Binding and Retrieval in Action Control and Its Alterations in Tourette Syndrome
- Intentional Forgetting of Autobiographical Memories: Current Neuroimaging Evidence and Moving Towards an Integrationist EEG-fMRI Approach
- Respiration and individual differences shape behavioral and inter-brain synchronization
- Severe warming alters biomass allocation and enhances ecosystem respiration in an alpine grassland: evidence from a short-term mesocosm experiment
BibTeX
@article{shibata2026respirationaction,
title = {{Respiration–action coupling and intentional binding in a Libet clock paradigm}},
author = {Hiroshi Shibata and Joel Patchitt and Yoko Nagai and Keita Mizuhara and Hugo Critchley and Hideki Ohira},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-73103-8},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-73103-8},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Respiration–action coupling and intentional binding in a Libet clock paradigm
AU - Hiroshi Shibata
AU - Joel Patchitt
AU - Yoko Nagai
AU - Keita Mizuhara
AU - Hugo Critchley
AU - Hideki Ohira
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-73103-8
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-73103-8
AB - Interoception, the physiological sensing of internal bodily states, has been proposed to contribute to the sense of self. However, empirical research that directly investigates interoceptive contributions to the sense of agency remains limited. Based on the observed synchronisation between respiratory phase and the initiation of voluntary action, we implemented the Libet clock task to test the hypothesis that the respiratory phase would modulate intentional binding (IB), a temporal binding phenomenon often used as an implicit measure related to agency. Additionally, we aimed to replicate respiration–action synchronisation and to examine exploratory cardiac-phase effects on binding. The overall key-binding effect was small and did not reach statistical significance, whereas tone binding was significant. Neither key nor tone binding showed reliable respiratory-phase modulation, although respiration–action synchronisation was replicated. Bayesian model comparisons strongly favoured models in which binding did not vary with respiratory phase. For cardiac phase, a frequentist mixed-effects model suggested phase-dependent modulation of key binding, but Bayesian model comparison did not support including cardiac-phase interactions. Together, these findings show that respiration–action coupling was present in the task but was not accompanied by detectable respiratory-phase modulation of intentional binding; the cardiac finding should be considered exploratory.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -