Causal beliefs and behavioural self-evaluation in cardiac rehabilitation: a cross-national study in the United States and Japan
- 1Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
Abstract
Background: Patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) continue to face substantial residual risk of recurrent events despite optimal medical management. Beliefs about disease causation, particularly attribution to genetic versus lifestyle factors, may influence health behaviour; however, their relationship with behavioural self-evaluation remains poorly understood. This study examined (1) cross-national differences in causal beliefs between patients in the United States (US) and Japan, and (2) associations between these beliefs, exercise confidence, and behavioural self-evaluation.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among phase II cardiac rehabilitation patients in the US (n = 56) and Japan (n = 120). Causal beliefs, exercise confidence, and self-reported exercise behaviour were assessed by questionnaire. Between-group comparisons were performed using independent-samples t-tests and factorial ANOVA; associations between beliefs and behaviour were examined using binary logistic regression.
Results: US participants attributed their CVD more strongly to genetic factors than Japanese participants (mean ± SD: 55.33 ± 32.06% vs. 29.36 ± 30.68%; Cohen’s d = 0.83, p < 0.001), whereas Japanese participants attributed their CVD more strongly to lifestyle factors (63.55 ± 29.62% vs. 41.82 ± 30.28%; Cohen’s d = 0.73, p < 0.001). US participants demonstrated greater confidence in achieving exercise goals than Japanese participants (p < 0.001). An exploratory interaction between disease type and genetic attribution was observed for exercise confidence (p = 0.03). Participants with high lifestyle attribution were less likely to report their current exercise level as sufficient (behavioural self-evaluation) (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22–0.97, p = 0.042).
Conclusions: Patients’ beliefs about disease causation differ between the US and Japan and are associated with exercise confidence. The findings suggest that belief systems may represent an important psychological pathway underlying behavioural self-evaluation, with potential implications for cardiovascular secondary prevention. Importantly, beliefs may influence how patients evaluate the adequacy of their behaviour rather than behavioural engagement alone. Future longitudinal and intervention studies are warranted to determine whether interventions targeting causal beliefs and behavioural self-evaluation can improve health outcomes in cardiovascular secondary prevention.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06452-x.
Related
- Digital training to support delivery of an evidence-based cardiac rehabilitation programme for heart failure: a mixed-methods evaluation of healthcare professionals' training experiences and intervention fidelity.
- Factors influencing health beliefs regarding facial nerve rehabilitation training in patients with peripheral facial paralysis: a qualitative study
- Bringing Cardiac Rehabilitation Closer to Patients
- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Cardiac Pacemakers: From Device Optimization to Individualized Cardiac Rehabilitation
- Telerehabilitation vs. centre-based cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome: results of the pragmatic TELECOR randomized trial
BibTeX
@article{shirai2026causal,
title = {{Causal beliefs and behavioural self-evaluation in cardiac rehabilitation: a cross-national study in the United States and Japan}},
author = {Tamami Shirai},
journal = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12872-026-06452-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06452-x},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Causal beliefs and behavioural self-evaluation in cardiac rehabilitation: a cross-national study in the United States and Japan
AU - Tamami Shirai
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/10
JO - BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
DO - 10.1186/s12872-026-06452-x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06452-x
AB - Background: Patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) continue to face substantial residual risk of recurrent events despite optimal medical management. Beliefs about disease causation, particularly attribution to genetic versus lifestyle factors, may influence health behaviour; however, their relationship with behavioural self-evaluation remains poorly understood. This study examined (1) cross-national differences in causal beliefs between patients in the United States (US) and Japan, and (2) associations between these beliefs, exercise confidence, and behavioural self-evaluation. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among phase II cardiac rehabilitation patients in the US (n = 56) and Japan (n = 120). Causal beliefs, exercise confidence, and self-reported exercise behaviour were assessed by questionnaire. Between-group comparisons were performed using independent-samples t-tests and factorial ANOVA; associations between beliefs and behaviour were examined using binary logistic regression. Results: US participants attributed their CVD more strongly to genetic factors than Japanese participants (mean ± SD: 55.33 ± 32.06% vs. 29.36 ± 30.68%; Cohen’s d = 0.83, p < 0.001), whereas Japanese participants attributed their CVD more strongly to lifestyle factors (63.55 ± 29.62% vs. 41.82 ± 30.28%; Cohen’s d = 0.73, p < 0.001). US participants demonstrated greater confidence in achieving exercise goals than Japanese participants (p < 0.001). An exploratory interaction between disease type and genetic attribution was observed for exercise confidence (p = 0.03). Participants with high lifestyle attribution were less likely to report their current exercise level as sufficient (behavioural self-evaluation) (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22–0.97, p = 0.042). Conclusions: Patients’ beliefs about disease causation differ between the US and Japan and are associated with exercise confidence. The findings suggest that belief systems may represent an important psychological pathway underlying behavioural self-evaluation, with potential implications for cardiovascular secondary prevention. Importantly, beliefs may influence how patients evaluate the adequacy of their behaviour rather than behavioural engagement alone. Future longitudinal and intervention studies are warranted to determine whether interventions targeting causal beliefs and behavioural self-evaluation can improve health outcomes in cardiovascular secondary prevention. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06452-x.
SN - 1471-2261
ER -