A note on the responsiveness of neurons
- 1KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Abstract
The time constant of biological neurons is typically around 5-20ms. This raises the question of how a system made of slow devices can generate and respond to faster signals. A potential solution is a population of uncorrelated neurons that, as a whole, can respond arbitrarily fast despite individual slow neurons. The response speed of a neuron or a population of neurons is often defined as how quickly neurons increase or decrease their firing rate given a change in the input, similar to a reaction time. Less emphasis is placed on the recovery time - the duration to transition and settle in a stationary state again in response to the change in the input. Here, we investigate the reaction time and the recovery time of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons given a change in, either the mean input drive, or input fluctuation level. In general, neurons react faster and fire quicker the larger the change in the input. Moreover, the closer the membrane potential is to the threshold, the faster the reaction. We observe that neurons react faster to increased input fluctuations than to stronger mean drive. Complementarily, the recovery time is systematically longer the larger the input change. Also, the closer the neurons' potentials are to the threshold, the longer it takes the neuron to recover. Most interestingly, the baseline firing of the neuron strongly determines whether recovery is faster when the change happens in the mean drive or the fluctuation level. This observation suggests that communication via the mean drive and the fluctuation level could target different aspects of the overall response - quick reaction time and the recovery speed - based on the initial baseline activity.
Related
- Skeletal muscle-innervating small dorsal root ganglion neurons exhibit greater mechanosensitivity and responsiveness to Yoda-1 in rats
- Deletion of the sodium leak channel NALCN in dopamine neurons alters D2R-mediated signalling and psychostimulant responsiveness.
- Hormone oscillations preserve cellular responsiveness to future physiological demands
- Distinct metabolic states of yeast and pseudohyphae differentially prime innate immune responsiveness
- Metabolic Responsiveness of Olive (Olea europaea L.) Cultivars Following Foliar Silicon Application: A Comparative LC–MS/MS Study
BibTeX
@misc{wernecke2026note,
title = {{A note on the responsiveness of neurons}},
author = {H. O. Wernecke and A. Kumar},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.21.760714},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.760714v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - A note on the responsiveness of neurons
AU - H. O. Wernecke
AU - A. Kumar
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.21.760714
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.760714v1
AB - The time constant of biological neurons is typically around 5-20ms. This raises the question of how a system made of slow devices can generate and respond to faster signals. A potential solution is a population of uncorrelated neurons that, as a whole, can respond arbitrarily fast despite individual slow neurons. The response speed of a neuron or a population of neurons is often defined as how quickly neurons increase or decrease their firing rate given a change in the input, similar to a reaction time. Less emphasis is placed on the recovery time - the duration to transition and settle in a stationary state again in response to the change in the input. Here, we investigate the reaction time and the recovery time of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons given a change in, either the mean input drive, or input fluctuation level. In general, neurons react faster and fire quicker the larger the change in the input. Moreover, the closer the membrane potential is to the threshold, the faster the reaction. We observe that neurons react faster to increased input fluctuations than to stronger mean drive. Complementarily, the recovery time is systematically longer the larger the input change. Also, the closer the neurons' potentials are to the threshold, the longer it takes the neuron to recover. Most interestingly, the baseline firing of the neuron strongly determines whether recovery is faster when the change happens in the mean drive or the fluctuation level. This observation suggests that communication via the mean drive and the fluctuation level could target different aspects of the overall response - quick reaction time and the recovery speed - based on the initial baseline activity.
ER -