Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Conformal Coverage of Time Series: Validity and Inference

Abstract

Conformal prediction provides marginal coverage guarantees, yet practitioners may wonder if the observed coverage is truly abnormal or consistent with sampling variation. Inference for realized coverage has received comparatively little attention, especially for time series. We study split conformal prediction with adjacent calibration and test sets of temporally dependent data. Using the functional dependence measure, we derive non-asymptotic bounds on marginal coverage error without mixing assumptions, which can be difficult to verify and may fail even for simple short-memory models. We establish a Bahadur representation to derive, to our knowledge, the first central limit theorem for realized coverage of split conformal prediction under temporal dependence. A consistent block-based estimator of the standard error yields an asymptotically justified test. We further study long-memory time series, which remain understudied in conformal prediction. For Gaussian linear processes, we show how very strong temporal dependence can lead to a non-Gaussian limiting law of realized coverage and establish block-sampling inference with an estimated normalization. The resulting theory explains how temporal dependence changes coverage uncertainty.

Related

  1. Dynamic Dual-Feedback Conformal Inference for Time Series Forecasting
    Songlin Du, Ling Luo, Uwe Aickelin
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Adaptive Conformal Inference Under Delayed Feedback: Coverage Guarantees and a Delay-to-Memory Diagnostic
    Lama El Halabi, Adam Brandt
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Honest Inference for Synthetic Controls with Imperfect Fit: Time-Split Validity and the Choice of Anchor
    Rok Spruk
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Auditing Conformal Prediction for Language Models Under Inference-Time Model Shift
    Achref Doula, Max Mühlhäuser
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Conformal Prediction for Time Series with Deep Sequence Models
    Junghwan Lee, Jonghyeok Lee, Yao Xie
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{zhai2026conformal,
  title = {{Conformal Coverage of Time Series: Validity and Inference}},
  author = {Percy S. Zhai and Maggie Cheng and Wei Biao Wu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.33868},
  eprint = {2609.33868},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33868},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Conformal Coverage of Time Series: Validity and Inference
AU  - Percy S. Zhai
AU  - Maggie Cheng
AU  - Wei Biao Wu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.33868
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33868
AB  - Conformal prediction provides marginal coverage guarantees, yet practitioners may wonder if the observed coverage is truly abnormal or consistent with sampling variation. Inference for realized coverage has received comparatively little attention, especially for time series. We study split conformal prediction with adjacent calibration and test sets of temporally dependent data. Using the functional dependence measure, we derive non-asymptotic bounds on marginal coverage error without mixing assumptions, which can be difficult to verify and may fail even for simple short-memory models. We establish a Bahadur representation to derive, to our knowledge, the first central limit theorem for realized coverage of split conformal prediction under temporal dependence. A consistent block-based estimator of the standard error yields an asymptotically justified test. We further study long-memory time series, which remain understudied in conformal prediction. For Gaussian linear processes, we show how very strong temporal dependence can lead to a non-Gaussian limiting law of realized coverage and establish block-sampling inference with an estimated normalization. The resulting theory explains how temporal dependence changes coverage uncertainty.
ER  -