Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDAnnals of hematology

Real-world outcomes of glofitamab monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter Korean cohort.

6 affiliations
  1. 1Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
  3. 3Department of Hematology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 07345, Republic of Korea.
  4. 4Department of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 06591, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  5. 5Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
  6. 6Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea. [email protected].

Abstract

Glofitamab, a CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody, has shown durable activity in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RR-DLBCL), but real-world data from Korean patients and after CAR-T failure remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with RR-DLBCL treated with glofitamab monotherapy. Response and safety were assessed in all patients, whereas the main survival and prognostic analyses were conducted in the non-bridge-intent cohort (n = 41), excluding five bridge-intent patients. Median age was 57.5 years; patients had received a median of three prior lines, and 58.7% had failed prior CAR-T. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate was 39.1% and the complete response rate was 32.6%. In the non-bridge-intent cohort, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.6 and 5.9 months, respectively, after a median follow-up of 8.2 months. Median duration of response was not reached, and 10 of 15 responders remained in response. Prior CAR-T exposure was not associated with PFS or OS. A longer pre-glofitamab interval was associated with improved PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51 per category increase; p = 0.018), but not OS. Patients with an interval < 1 month had an ORR of 15.4% and median PFS of 1.0 month. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 26.1%, all Grade 1 or 2; no immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome or treatment-related deaths occurred. Glofitamab monotherapy demonstrated clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety in heavily pretreated RR-DLBCL. In exploratory analyses, a shorter pre-glofitamab treatment interval was associated with poorer outcomes; this hypothesis-generating observation requires prospective validation.

Related

  1. 1187 Safety and efficacy of cesalatamig, a novel PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody, as monotherapy in PD-(L)1–resistant/refractory NSCLC: Results from global, multicenter, open-label phase 1/2 studies
    Yang Liu, Yu Liu, Fawzi Abu Rous +31
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  2. Successful salvage therapy with glofitamab followed by selinexor maintenance in an elderly patient with primary refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma harboring TP53 and CD58 mutations: a case report and literature review
    Yurong Zhang, Huan Liu, Liangliang Li +5
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
  3. EMB-01, an Anti-EGFR/c-MET Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer from a Phase Ib/II, Open-Label, Multicenter Study
    Ting Xu, Christine M. Parseghian, Yanqiao Zhang +15
    Clinical Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  4. PD-1-based combination therapy versus monotherapy in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Weiming Zhang, Nasha Yu, Qiang Ding +3
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyFrontiersCrossref
  5. MAJESTEC-9: A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED STUDY OF TECLISTAMAB MONOTHERAPY VS INVESTIGATOR’S CHOICE OF POMALIDOMIDE, BORTEZOMIB, AND DEXAMETHASONE OR CARFILZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE (PVD/KD) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH RELAPSED REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM)
    Roberto MINA, Cyrille TOUZEAU, Vania HUNGRIA +17
    Hematology, Transfusion and Cell TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{kim2026realworld,
  title = {{Real-world outcomes of glofitamab monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter Korean cohort.}},
  author = {Changgon Kim and Youngil Koh and Youngwoo Jeon and Yoon Seok Choi and Seok Jin Kim and Won Seog Kim and Sang Eun Yoon},
  journal = {Annals of hematology},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1007/s00277-026-07212-9},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42955341},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Real-world outcomes of glofitamab monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter Korean cohort.
AU  - Changgon Kim
AU  - Youngil Koh
AU  - Youngwoo Jeon
AU  - Yoon Seok Choi
AU  - Seok Jin Kim
AU  - Won Seog Kim
AU  - Sang Eun Yoon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - Annals of hematology
DO  - 10.1007/s00277-026-07212-9
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42955341
AB  - Glofitamab, a CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody, has shown durable activity in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RR-DLBCL), but real-world data from Korean patients and after CAR-T failure remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with RR-DLBCL treated with glofitamab monotherapy. Response and safety were assessed in all patients, whereas the main survival and prognostic analyses were conducted in the non-bridge-intent cohort (n = 41), excluding five bridge-intent patients. Median age was 57.5 years; patients had received a median of three prior lines, and 58.7% had failed prior CAR-T. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate was 39.1% and the complete response rate was 32.6%. In the non-bridge-intent cohort, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.6 and 5.9 months, respectively, after a median follow-up of 8.2 months. Median duration of response was not reached, and 10 of 15 responders remained in response. Prior CAR-T exposure was not associated with PFS or OS. A longer pre-glofitamab interval was associated with improved PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51 per category increase; p = 0.018), but not OS. Patients with an interval < 1 month had an ORR of 15.4% and median PFS of 1.0 month. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 26.1%, all Grade 1 or 2; no immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome or treatment-related deaths occurred. Glofitamab monotherapy demonstrated clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety in heavily pretreated RR-DLBCL. In exploratory analyses, a shorter pre-glofitamab treatment interval was associated with poorer outcomes; this hypothesis-generating observation requires prospective validation.
SN  - 0939-5555
SN  - 1432-0584
ER  -