Planned Distal Pancreatectomy and Splenectomy for Pancreatic Tail Necrosis and Splenic Infarction after Embolization for Gastric Ulcer-Induced Splenic Artery Perforation: A Case Report.
- 1Emergency Center/Shock and Trauma Center, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Inzai, Chiba, Japan.
- 2Department of Surgery, Masuda Red Cross Hospital, Masuda, Shimane, Japan.
- 3Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
Introduction
Splenic artery perforation secondary to gastric ulcer is a rare but life-threatening cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) can provide rapid hemorrhage control, but delayed ischemic complications involving the pancreatic tail and spleen are uncommon.Case presentation
A woman in her 70s presented with hematemesis and profound hemorrhagic shock. Contrast-enhanced CT showed active extravasation from the splenic artery adjacent to the posterior gastric wall. During emergency SAE, coils were deployed across the bleeding point, but persistent extravasation required additional embolization with a 1:2 mixture of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and lipiodol. Final angiography confirmed hemostasis with preservation of the dorsal and great pancreatic arteries. CT on hospital day 2 showed no apparent pancreatic ischemic change. On day 11, newly developed hypoattenuating areas involving the pancreatic tail and part of the spleen were detected, suggestive of ischemic changes. The patient had no abdominal pain or overt clinical deterioration. Laboratory abnormalities that had improved by day 8 showed a secondary increase on day 11, with a white blood cell count of 12200/μL, C-reactive protein level of 3.90 mg/dL, and serum amylase level of 456 U/L. Planned distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were selected after individualized assessment of the pancreatic and splenic ischemic changes, together with a residual splenic hilar aneurysmal lesion and suspected posterior gastric wall penetration. Pathological examination confirmed pancreatic necrosis and splenic infarction. No postoperative pancreatic fistula or other major postoperative complication occurred, and the patient was discharged on hospital day 38 after rehabilitation.Conclusions
NBCA-assisted SAE can achieve rapid hemostasis in life-threatening splenic arterial bleeding, but post-embolization surveillance remains important. This case illustrates that management of post-SAE ischemic changes should be individualized and that planned surgery in a clinically stable patient should be based on the overall clinical and anatomical context.
Related
- A 61-Year-Old Woman With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Managed With Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, Total Pancreatectomy, Splenectomy, Portal Vein and Common Hepatic Artery Resection, and Combined Vascular Reconstruction Using Splenic Artery Transposition: A Case Report
- Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy with Splenectomy for a Multiloculated Primary Splenic Epidermoid Cyst Mimicking a Lymphangioma in an Older Woman: A Case Report.
- Preoperative Total Iron‐Binding Capacity Is a Potential Surrogate Marker of Long‐Term Outcomes After Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer
- Pancreatic head solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm in a man treated by robot-assisted laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy: a case report.
- Clinical Course and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocyst Perforation
BibTeX
@article{saito2026planned,
title = {{Planned Distal Pancreatectomy and Splenectomy for Pancreatic Tail Necrosis and Splenic Infarction after Embolization for Gastric Ulcer-Induced Splenic Artery Perforation: A Case Report.}},
author = {Yasutaka Saito and Kazuki Masiko and Taichiro Ueda and Yoshiaki Hara},
journal = {Surgical case reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.70352/scrj.cr.26-0385},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904290},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Planned Distal Pancreatectomy and Splenectomy for Pancreatic Tail Necrosis and Splenic Infarction after Embolization for Gastric Ulcer-Induced Splenic Artery Perforation: A Case Report.
AU - Yasutaka Saito
AU - Kazuki Masiko
AU - Taichiro Ueda
AU - Yoshiaki Hara
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/17
JO - Surgical case reports
DO - 10.70352/scrj.cr.26-0385
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904290
AB - Introduction Splenic artery perforation secondary to gastric ulcer is a rare but life-threatening cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) can provide rapid hemorrhage control, but delayed ischemic complications involving the pancreatic tail and spleen are uncommon.Case presentation A woman in her 70s presented with hematemesis and profound hemorrhagic shock. Contrast-enhanced CT showed active extravasation from the splenic artery adjacent to the posterior gastric wall. During emergency SAE, coils were deployed across the bleeding point, but persistent extravasation required additional embolization with a 1:2 mixture of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and lipiodol. Final angiography confirmed hemostasis with preservation of the dorsal and great pancreatic arteries. CT on hospital day 2 showed no apparent pancreatic ischemic change. On day 11, newly developed hypoattenuating areas involving the pancreatic tail and part of the spleen were detected, suggestive of ischemic changes. The patient had no abdominal pain or overt clinical deterioration. Laboratory abnormalities that had improved by day 8 showed a secondary increase on day 11, with a white blood cell count of 12200/μL, C-reactive protein level of 3.90 mg/dL, and serum amylase level of 456 U/L. Planned distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were selected after individualized assessment of the pancreatic and splenic ischemic changes, together with a residual splenic hilar aneurysmal lesion and suspected posterior gastric wall penetration. Pathological examination confirmed pancreatic necrosis and splenic infarction. No postoperative pancreatic fistula or other major postoperative complication occurred, and the patient was discharged on hospital day 38 after rehabilitation.Conclusions NBCA-assisted SAE can achieve rapid hemostasis in life-threatening splenic arterial bleeding, but post-embolization surveillance remains important. This case illustrates that management of post-SAE ischemic changes should be individualized and that planned surgery in a clinically stable patient should be based on the overall clinical and anatomical context.
SN - 2198-7793
ER -