Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
PreprintCC BYResearch Square

A Multi-Counter Architecture of Replicative Aging (MCARA)

  1. 1Georgia Longevity Alliance

Abstract

Human fibroblasts arrest after a finite number of divisions — even when telomerase keeps telomeres long and low oxygen protects mitochondria. I argue that the centriole functions as a stress integrator: when operating as a centrosome organizer, it accumulates polyglutamylation (polyE) on its tubulin in response to replicative and oxidative stress, remodeling its signaling surface — the Centriolar Aging-Associated Signaling Module (CAASM). When operating as a cilium organizer, polyE accumulation ceases. This functional duality — centrosome (stress-responsive, polyE-accumulating) versus cilium (signaling, non-accumulating) — makes the centriole a conditional entropy carrier. The framework (MCARA — Multi-Counter Architecture of Replicative Aging) is a hypothesis, not a confirmed theory: its centriolar component, CEDAR (Centriolar Entropy-Driven Aging Registry), sits at GRADE level V. It makes one falsifiable prediction: eliminating centrioles from fibroblasts before OSKM reprogramming should raise iPSC colony efficiency at least twofold. The experiment has not been reported. The centriole is hardware with a unique property: it cannot be repaired in situ, but it can be eliminated and created de novo — exactly what happens in meiosis, where oocyte centrioles are eliminated and sperm centrioles are restructured into seeds (not templates) for de novo centrioles in the blastomeres of the new organism. This distinguishes the centriole from the epigenome: the epigenome is reprogrammable software; the centriole is replaceable but not repairable hardware. The hardware/software distinction explains why partial reprogramming yields incomplete rejuvenation. A critical alternative interpretation — that centriole removal may increase reprogramming efficiency by impairing differentiation competence or suppressing Wnt signaling via ciliogenesis defects, rather than resetting an aging clock — is addressed in the experimental design. Either outcome is progress.

Related

  1. Quantitative imaging of native tissue architecture combined with deep multi-omics reveals the spatial biology of kidney aging
    W. V. Trim, M. Diakova, M. Sonnett +11
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textPhysiologybioRxiv
  2. Coordinated cellular architecture reveals weakened cortical structure–behavior coupling in normal aging
    Xiaoyi Zhan, Pengcheng Tan, Tirzah Tan +1
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Shared genetic architecture between constipation and aging-related phenotypes : Insights from large-scale genome-wide cross-trait analysis
    Yixuan Liao, Wei Liu, Xiaojin Liu +1
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. The secretory peptidase inhibitor R3HDML fine-tunes p38 MAPK signaling to maintain glomerular basement membrane architecture during renal aging and disease
    Manuel Rogg, Christoph Schell, Ann-Kathrin Scherzinger +9
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefDOAJ
  5. Structural disorder within the replicative complex of measles virus: functional implications.
    Jean-Marie Bourhis, Bruno Canard, Sonia Longhi
    VirologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text92 citedEpidemiology & public healthHAL
BibTeX
@misc{tqemaladze2026multicounter,
  title = {{A Multi-Counter Architecture of Replicative Aging (MCARA)}},
  author = {Jaba Tqemaladze},
  howpublished = {Research Square},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-10320101/v1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10320101/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Multi-Counter Architecture of Replicative Aging (MCARA)
AU  - Jaba Tqemaladze
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/14
PB  - Research Square
DO  - 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10320101/v1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10320101/v1
AB  - Human fibroblasts arrest after a finite number of divisions — even when telomerase keeps telomeres long and low oxygen protects mitochondria. I argue that the centriole functions as a stress integrator: when operating as a centrosome organizer, it accumulates polyglutamylation (polyE) on its tubulin in response to replicative and oxidative stress, remodeling its signaling surface — the Centriolar Aging-Associated Signaling Module (CAASM). When operating as a cilium organizer, polyE accumulation ceases. This functional duality — centrosome (stress-responsive, polyE-accumulating) versus cilium (signaling, non-accumulating) — makes the centriole a conditional entropy carrier. The framework (MCARA — Multi-Counter Architecture of Replicative Aging) is a hypothesis, not a confirmed theory: its centriolar component, CEDAR (Centriolar Entropy-Driven Aging Registry), sits at GRADE level V. It makes one falsifiable prediction: eliminating centrioles from fibroblasts before OSKM reprogramming should raise iPSC colony efficiency at least twofold. The experiment has not been reported. The centriole is hardware with a unique property: it cannot be repaired in situ, but it can be eliminated and created de novo — exactly what happens in meiosis, where oocyte centrioles are eliminated and sperm centrioles are restructured into seeds (not templates) for de novo centrioles in the blastomeres of the new organism. This distinguishes the centriole from the epigenome: the epigenome is reprogrammable software; the centriole is replaceable but not repairable hardware. The hardware/software distinction explains why partial reprogramming yields incomplete rejuvenation. A critical alternative interpretation — that centriole removal may increase reprogramming efficiency by impairing differentiation competence or suppressing Wnt signaling via ciliogenesis defects, rather than resetting an aging clock — is addressed in the experimental design. Either outcome is progress.
ER  -