Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

Everter-Assisted Arterial Coupling in Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Preclinical Study and Retrospective Feasibility Case Series

  1. 1Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  2. 2Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Arterial coupling in microsurgery remains technically challenging despite widespread venous coupler adoption. We developed a novel everter device to facilitate arterial anastomosis using mechanical couplers and evaluated its feasibility and potential efficiency in abdominal-based breast reconstruction. Methods: Five pigs underwent paired superior epigastric artery flap reconstruction with everter-assisted and hand-sewn arterial anastomoses, analyzed using a paired t-test. A retrospective clinical series included 12 patients, 22 reconstructed breasts, 14 coupling attempts, and 8 primary hand-sewn recipient arterial anastomoses. The primary clinical outcome was successful coupling without revision or conversion. Clinical timing comparisons were descriptive. Results: All five porcine arterial couplings were successful. Mean arterial time was 8.47 ± 2.83 min versus 20.26 ± 3.32 min for hand-sewn controls, a paired reduction of 11.79 min (95% CI, 5.86 to 17.72; p = 0.005). Clinical coupling succeeded in 9 of 14 attempts (64.3%). Five attempts required conversion (35.7%), including three thrombotic and two technical failures. All were converted intraoperatively, with no flap loss. Mean arterial times were 9.2 ± 4.2 min for successful coupling (n = 8) and 20.2 ± 8.0 min for primary hand-sewn anastomosis (n = 6), an approximately 55% difference. Conclusions: Everter-assisted arterial coupling demonstrated clinical feasibility and shorter mean arterial times when successfully completed. These findings support further refinement and evaluation of the technique to establish safety and overall procedural efficiency.

Related

  1. Feasibility and Safety of Intraoperative Abdominal Warming During Spinal Surgery in the Prone Position: A Pilot Study
    Masato Ishii, Beniko Itokawa
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction for ureteropelvic junction obstruction combined with congenital renal anomalies: a single-center retrospective case series of 38 patients.
    Shimeng Zhao, Kunlin Yang, Zhihua Li +7
    Translational andrology and urologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
  3. Operative management of abdominal bulge following deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review of repair strategies and outcomes
    Raj Saini, Akshay Soni, Felicity Huang +2
    Gland SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Free Innervated Gracilis Muscular Flap for Functional Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Following Desmoid Tumor Resection: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Efstathios G. Lykoudis, Marios Papadakis, Ilias Stylianos K. Iliadis +3
    MicrosurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Feasibility and diagnostic utility of echocardiographic distal abdominal aortic diastolic flow reversal for assessing aortic regurgitation.
    Wataru Suzuki, Sakiko Kojima, Reina Takeda +9
    European heart journal. Imaging methods and practicePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{dehdashtian2026everterassisted,
  title = {{Everter-Assisted Arterial Coupling in Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Preclinical Study and Retrospective Feasibility Case Series}},
  author = {Amir Dehdashtian and Michael Sorkin and Paul S. Cederna and Adeyiza O. Momoh},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18203343},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3343},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Everter-Assisted Arterial Coupling in Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Preclinical Study and Retrospective Feasibility Case Series
AU  - Amir Dehdashtian
AU  - Michael Sorkin
AU  - Paul S. Cederna
AU  - Adeyiza O. Momoh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18203343
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3343
AB  - Background/Objectives: Arterial coupling in microsurgery remains technically challenging despite widespread venous coupler adoption. We developed a novel everter device to facilitate arterial anastomosis using mechanical couplers and evaluated its feasibility and potential efficiency in abdominal-based breast reconstruction. Methods: Five pigs underwent paired superior epigastric artery flap reconstruction with everter-assisted and hand-sewn arterial anastomoses, analyzed using a paired t-test. A retrospective clinical series included 12 patients, 22 reconstructed breasts, 14 coupling attempts, and 8 primary hand-sewn recipient arterial anastomoses. The primary clinical outcome was successful coupling without revision or conversion. Clinical timing comparisons were descriptive. Results: All five porcine arterial couplings were successful. Mean arterial time was 8.47 ± 2.83 min versus 20.26 ± 3.32 min for hand-sewn controls, a paired reduction of 11.79 min (95% CI, 5.86 to 17.72; p = 0.005). Clinical coupling succeeded in 9 of 14 attempts (64.3%). Five attempts required conversion (35.7%), including three thrombotic and two technical failures. All were converted intraoperatively, with no flap loss. Mean arterial times were 9.2 ± 4.2 min for successful coupling (n = 8) and 20.2 ± 8.0 min for primary hand-sewn anastomosis (n = 6), an approximately 55% difference. Conclusions: Everter-assisted arterial coupling demonstrated clinical feasibility and shorter mean arterial times when successfully completed. These findings support further refinement and evaluation of the technique to establish safety and overall procedural efficiency.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -