Ectasia Risk Assessment Before Laser Vision Correction: The Evolving Role of Corneal Pachymetry
4 affiliations
- 1Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal
- 2NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS, FCM, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal
- 3Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, 4050-342 Porto, Portugal
- 4Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aims to review the evolution of preoperative ectasia risk assessment before laser vision correction (LVC), with particular emphasis on the changing role of corneal pachymetry and its interpretation within contemporary multimodal screening strategies. Methods: A structured narrative review of the literature was conducted to examine the historical development of ectasia screening, the incorporation of pachymetric parameters into successive risk models, and the available evidence regarding refractive outcomes in constitutionally thin corneas undergoing laser vision correction. Results: Preoperative ectasia screening has evolved from reliance on isolated clinical and topographic parameters to comprehensive multimodal assessment integrating corneal tomography, biomechanics, epithelial thickness mapping, and artificial intelligence-based indices. Although corneal pachymetry remains a key component of most contemporary risk models, increasing evidence suggests that constitutionally thin corneas with otherwise normal tomographic and biomechanical profiles can achieve favourable outcomes following surface ablation. However, the available evidence remains limited by retrospective study designs, highly selected populations, and insufficient long-term follow-up. Conclusions: Corneal thickness should no longer be interpreted as an isolated indicator of ectasia risk but rather as one component of an integrated assessment of corneal susceptibility. Contemporary preoperative screening should prioritise individualised multimodal evaluation over reliance on isolated pachymetric thresholds. At the same time, further prospective studies are needed to define the long-term safety of surface ablation in constitutionally thin corneas.
Related
- Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Corneal Astigmatic Correction Following Pterygium Excision by Bare Sclera Technique Versus Conjunctival Limbal Autograft: A Prospective Observational Study
- Corvis ST Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Review of preoperative tomographic and biomechanical corneal assessment for refractive surgery
- The Evolving Landscape of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Assessment, Precision Therapies, and Emerging Strategies
- Assessment of corneal reflex sensitivity and vision-related functions among contact lens wearers: a cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{loureiro2026ectasia,
title = {{Ectasia Risk Assessment Before Laser Vision Correction: The Evolving Role of Corneal Pachymetry}},
author = {Tomás Loureiro and João Heitor Marques and Nuno Campos and Tiago Monteiro},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15218560},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8560},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Ectasia Risk Assessment Before Laser Vision Correction: The Evolving Role of Corneal Pachymetry
AU - Tomás Loureiro
AU - João Heitor Marques
AU - Nuno Campos
AU - Tiago Monteiro
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15218560
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8560
AB - Background/Objectives: This study aims to review the evolution of preoperative ectasia risk assessment before laser vision correction (LVC), with particular emphasis on the changing role of corneal pachymetry and its interpretation within contemporary multimodal screening strategies. Methods: A structured narrative review of the literature was conducted to examine the historical development of ectasia screening, the incorporation of pachymetric parameters into successive risk models, and the available evidence regarding refractive outcomes in constitutionally thin corneas undergoing laser vision correction. Results: Preoperative ectasia screening has evolved from reliance on isolated clinical and topographic parameters to comprehensive multimodal assessment integrating corneal tomography, biomechanics, epithelial thickness mapping, and artificial intelligence-based indices. Although corneal pachymetry remains a key component of most contemporary risk models, increasing evidence suggests that constitutionally thin corneas with otherwise normal tomographic and biomechanical profiles can achieve favourable outcomes following surface ablation. However, the available evidence remains limited by retrospective study designs, highly selected populations, and insufficient long-term follow-up. Conclusions: Corneal thickness should no longer be interpreted as an isolated indicator of ectasia risk but rather as one component of an integrated assessment of corneal susceptibility. Contemporary preoperative screening should prioritise individualised multimodal evaluation over reliance on isolated pachymetric thresholds. At the same time, further prospective studies are needed to define the long-term safety of surface ablation in constitutionally thin corneas.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -