When Data Reform Meets Bureaucratic Hierarchy: A Political Economy Analysis of Institutionalizing a District Health Data Bank in West Sumbawa District, Indonesia
- 1Universitas Gadjah Mada Fakultas Kedokteran: Universitas Gadjah Mada Fakultas Kedokteran Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough often perceived as a technical tool, a data bank is fundamental for district performance management, facilitating integrated coordination, data consolidation, and routine information use for decision-making. However, implementation unfolds within hierarchical bureaucratic systems shaping authority distribution, workload allocation, coordination, and resource use. This study examines the political economy of institutionalizing a district-level health data bank in West Sumbawa District, Indonesia.
MethodA longitudinal qualitative case study was conducted in West Sumbawa District, West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia, from November 2025 to March 2026 across three evaluation phases (baseline, midline, endline), involving 25 District Health Office (DHO) officers appointed to the Health Data Bank team, representing five organizational units, including the Secretariat, General and Human Resources Unit, and Public Health Division. Data were collected through participatory workshops, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, observation, and document review, including official decrees, SOPs, meeting minutes, and implementation records, and analysed using Bosserts Decision Space Framework combined with a problem-driven political economy analysis examining how power relations, institutional norms, workload, resource support, and perceived incentives influenced whether technical reforms became operationalized in routine practice.
ResultsThe Health Data Bank progressed from strong institutional acceptance to structural formalization. Decision-making authority remained centralized within the Secretariat, enabling coordination but limiting distributed ownership. Resource constraints increased workload, concentrated in the Secretariat and division coordinators responsible for data consolidation and validation, without dedicated financing or staffing, despite improved analytical capacity. Accountability mechanisms were established through governance instruments, though enforcement and feedback loops remained underdeveloped. Data submission, validation, and use were not yet fully institutionalized, resulting in a gap between structural readiness and functional use.
ConclusionData institutionalization involves both technical and organizational processes, requiring collaborative negotiation of authority, workload, and resources. Continued attention to these factors will help structural formalization translate into sustainable operational outcomes.
Related
- District-Level Quality Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Maternal and Neonatal Complications in Indonesia
- E-MPATHY: Development, validation, reliability, and acceptability of a decision-support tool for district-level maternal death review in Indonesia
- Epidemiology of malaria and district-level factors associated with malaria elimination in Sumatra region, Indonesia: a retrospective analysis of surveillance data
- Institutionalizing Research Ethics Consultation to Improve Quality and Efficiency of Ethics Review
- Party affiliation, political ideology, views on democracy and society, and support for political violence in the United States of America: findings from a nationally representative survey
BibTeX
@misc{asrullah2026when,
title = {{When Data Reform Meets Bureaucratic Hierarchy: A Political Economy Analysis of Institutionalizing a District Health Data Bank in West Sumbawa District, Indonesia}},
author = {M. Asrullah and A. W. Ati and D. K. Fortunandha and G. F. Janitra and E. Setiawan and U. Mulyadita and A. Pratiwi and S. L. Dewi and M. Boxshall},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.25.26361308},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.25.26361308v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - When Data Reform Meets Bureaucratic Hierarchy: A Political Economy Analysis of Institutionalizing a District Health Data Bank in West Sumbawa District, Indonesia
AU - M. Asrullah
AU - A. W. Ati
AU - D. K. Fortunandha
AU - G. F. Janitra
AU - E. Setiawan
AU - U. Mulyadita
AU - A. Pratiwi
AU - S. L. Dewi
AU - M. Boxshall
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/25
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.25.26361308
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.25.26361308v1
AB - BackgroundAlthough often perceived as a technical tool, a data bank is fundamental for district performance management, facilitating integrated coordination, data consolidation, and routine information use for decision-making. However, implementation unfolds within hierarchical bureaucratic systems shaping authority distribution, workload allocation, coordination, and resource use. This study examines the political economy of institutionalizing a district-level health data bank in West Sumbawa District, Indonesia. MethodA longitudinal qualitative case study was conducted in West Sumbawa District, West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia, from November 2025 to March 2026 across three evaluation phases (baseline, midline, endline), involving 25 District Health Office (DHO) officers appointed to the Health Data Bank team, representing five organizational units, including the Secretariat, General and Human Resources Unit, and Public Health Division. Data were collected through participatory workshops, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, observation, and document review, including official decrees, SOPs, meeting minutes, and implementation records, and analysed using Bosserts Decision Space Framework combined with a problem-driven political economy analysis examining how power relations, institutional norms, workload, resource support, and perceived incentives influenced whether technical reforms became operationalized in routine practice. ResultsThe Health Data Bank progressed from strong institutional acceptance to structural formalization. Decision-making authority remained centralized within the Secretariat, enabling coordination but limiting distributed ownership. Resource constraints increased workload, concentrated in the Secretariat and division coordinators responsible for data consolidation and validation, without dedicated financing or staffing, despite improved analytical capacity. Accountability mechanisms were established through governance instruments, though enforcement and feedback loops remained underdeveloped. Data submission, validation, and use were not yet fully institutionalized, resulting in a gap between structural readiness and functional use. ConclusionData institutionalization involves both technical and organizational processes, requiring collaborative negotiation of authority, workload, and resources. Continued attention to these factors will help structural formalization translate into sustainable operational outcomes.
ER -