Governing children on the move in the SADC: Postcolonial assemblages, institutional bricolage, and the production of vulnerability
- 1Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa; Corresponding author.
- 2Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa; Northwest University's African Centre for Disaster Studies, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Potchefstroom, South Africa; University of Free State's Disaster Management Training Education Centre, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- 3National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
Abstract
Unaccompanied and separated migrant children move through a Southern African governance landscape in which extensive rights commitments coexist with weak and uneven protection. This article asks how layered regional and national arrangements produce or mitigate protection gaps for children on the move in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It reports a structured critical review of 19 legal, policy, judicial, and implementation documents, interpreted alongside 28 scholarly sources, most of them peer-reviewed. The analysis combines a child- rights benchmark with relational vulnerability, Ubuntu ethics, institutional bricolage, and assemblage theory. Four findings emerge. First, continental standards are substantially more child-specific than the SADC mobility regime, whose central protocol was still not in force in August 2026. Second, documentation operates as an administrative switch that converts formally universal rights into conditional entitlements. Third, protection is sequence-dependent: outcomes vary according to whether a child first encounters immigration, police, education, social welfare, or community actors. Fourth, children exercise constrained agency and often rely on improvised community and non-governmental care, but such resilience can conceal the withdrawal of public responsibility. The resulting protection gap need not be intentionally designed; it is politically reproduced through a postcolonial assemblage of inherited border controls, sectoral mandates, discretionary practices, and under-resourced services. The article therefore recommends institutional subtraction as well as addition: remove documentary preconditions for essential services, absorb parallel procedures into one child-protection pathway, repurpose existing case-management tools, and retire duplicative committees and reporting lines. The contribution is to explain migrant-child vulnerability as a governance outcome rather than an intrinsic attribute and to specify reforms that simplify, rather than further layer, the protection apparatus.
Related
- Financing resilience, governing vulnerability: Adaptation finance as a form of political infrastructure
- Drought vulnerability assessment and its severe impact on crop production and livelihood of people: An empirical modelling of northern Ghana
- Host Plant Effects on Soil Microbial Assemblages in Ultramafic Soils in New Caledonia: Insights From the Ni‐Hyperaccumulator Pycnandra acuminata and Its Non‐Hyperaccumulator Congener P. fastuosa
- Nature, origin, and phosphorylation potential of the phosphorus/sulfur‐bearing nanoscale multiphasic assemblages in the CM chondrites Murchison and Murray
- The effects of estuary salinization on benthic assemblages: a richer and treacherous future
BibTeX
@article{nhleko2026governing,
title = {{Governing children on the move in the SADC: Postcolonial assemblages, institutional bricolage, and the production of vulnerability}},
author = {Bathabile Nhleko and Wilfred Lunga and Mkhokheli Sithole},
journal = {Progress in Disaster Science},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100763},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100763},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Governing children on the move in the SADC: Postcolonial assemblages, institutional bricolage, and the production of vulnerability
AU - Bathabile Nhleko
AU - Wilfred Lunga
AU - Mkhokheli Sithole
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Progress in Disaster Science
DO - 10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100763
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100763
AB - Unaccompanied and separated migrant children move through a Southern African governance landscape in which extensive rights commitments coexist with weak and uneven protection. This article asks how layered regional and national arrangements produce or mitigate protection gaps for children on the move in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It reports a structured critical review of 19 legal, policy, judicial, and implementation documents, interpreted alongside 28 scholarly sources, most of them peer-reviewed. The analysis combines a child- rights benchmark with relational vulnerability, Ubuntu ethics, institutional bricolage, and assemblage theory. Four findings emerge. First, continental standards are substantially more child-specific than the SADC mobility regime, whose central protocol was still not in force in August 2026. Second, documentation operates as an administrative switch that converts formally universal rights into conditional entitlements. Third, protection is sequence-dependent: outcomes vary according to whether a child first encounters immigration, police, education, social welfare, or community actors. Fourth, children exercise constrained agency and often rely on improvised community and non-governmental care, but such resilience can conceal the withdrawal of public responsibility. The resulting protection gap need not be intentionally designed; it is politically reproduced through a postcolonial assemblage of inherited border controls, sectoral mandates, discretionary practices, and under-resourced services. The article therefore recommends institutional subtraction as well as addition: remove documentary preconditions for essential services, absorb parallel procedures into one child-protection pathway, repurpose existing case-management tools, and retire duplicative committees and reporting lines. The contribution is to explain migrant-child vulnerability as a governance outcome rather than an intrinsic attribute and to specify reforms that simplify, rather than further layer, the protection apparatus.
SN - 2590-0617
ER -