Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCCancer management and research

Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among First-Degree Relatives in China: A Qualitative Interview Study.

  1. 1Department of Anorectal Surgery, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
  2. 2Health Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. In 2020, approximately 560,000 new CRC cases were estimated in China. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with CRC have an elevated CRC risk and are recommended to begin screening earlier. Despite this elevated risk, screening uptake among FDRs remains suboptimal, and the reasons for non-uptake in the Chinese context are not fully understood. To explore perceived barriers and facilitators to CRC screening among FDRs of patients with CRC in China and to identify implications for health education and screening services. We used a qualitative phenomenological design. From April to May 2025, FDRs of patients attending the Colorectal Surgery Department of Ningbo Second Hospital were recruited purposively. Of 56 eligible relatives, 24 agreed to participate. Interviews and preliminary analysis proceeded iteratively, and data saturation was judged to have been reached after 10 interviews. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological method. Analysis of participant interviews identified four barriers to screening: limited awareness and underestimation of familial risk; fear and psychological resistance; financial and time burdens; and limited access to screening services. Four facilitators were also identified: witnessing a relative's illness and treatment; personalized and targeted health education; convenient and accessible screening services; and policy and social support. Screening decisions were shaped by interacting individual, practical, and health-system factors. The findings suggest potential targets for intervention at individual, service, and policy levels. This three-level framework is a conceptual implication of the qualitative findings and requires evaluation in larger and more diverse settings.

Related

  1. Perceived barriers and facilitators influencing cervical and breast cancer screening among healthcare professionals in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana: An explanatory mixed-methods study
    Stephen Mensah Arhin, Patience Ami Kponyoh, Christopher Alatarige
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. A preliminary qualitative exploration of perceived barriers and facilitators prior to implementation of a pressure injury prevention program in home care: perspectives of care managers in Japan.
    Keisuke Iwase, Hironori Tsuzuki, Masushi Kohta +2
    Fujita medical journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Perceived facilitators and barriers influencing lifestyle modification among adults with cardiovascular disease attending a cardiac clinic at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: An exploratory qualitative study
    Gladness N. Mkawe, Benedicto Mgala, Neema Mawi +5
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyCardiovascular medicinePLOSPMC
  4. Perceived barriers and facilitators to medical students participating in volunteer services for older adults with disabilities: a qualitative descriptive study
    Tong Liu, Runli Yang, Hui Dong +7
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Knowledge, attitude, practice, and perceived barriers of colorectal cancer screening among family physicians in Riyadh second health cluster
    Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Alkthiry, Hassan Saleh Almohammadi, Khalid Saad Alhamlan +2
    Journal of family medicine and primary carePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{mao2026perceived,
  title = {{Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among First-Degree Relatives in China: A Qualitative Interview Study.}},
  author = {Haoxun Mao and Yitong Hu and Sheng Li},
  journal = {Cancer management and research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2147/cmar.s635579},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953769},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among First-Degree Relatives in China: A Qualitative Interview Study.
AU  - Haoxun Mao
AU  - Yitong Hu
AU  - Sheng Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
JO  - Cancer management and research
DO  - 10.2147/cmar.s635579
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953769
AB  - Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. In 2020, approximately 560,000 new CRC cases were estimated in China. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with CRC have an elevated CRC risk and are recommended to begin screening earlier. Despite this elevated risk, screening uptake among FDRs remains suboptimal, and the reasons for non-uptake in the Chinese context are not fully understood. To explore perceived barriers and facilitators to CRC screening among FDRs of patients with CRC in China and to identify implications for health education and screening services. We used a qualitative phenomenological design. From April to May 2025, FDRs of patients attending the Colorectal Surgery Department of Ningbo Second Hospital were recruited purposively. Of 56 eligible relatives, 24 agreed to participate. Interviews and preliminary analysis proceeded iteratively, and data saturation was judged to have been reached after 10 interviews. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological method. Analysis of participant interviews identified four barriers to screening: limited awareness and underestimation of familial risk; fear and psychological resistance; financial and time burdens; and limited access to screening services. Four facilitators were also identified: witnessing a relative's illness and treatment; personalized and targeted health education; convenient and accessible screening services; and policy and social support. Screening decisions were shaped by interacting individual, practical, and health-system factors. The findings suggest potential targets for intervention at individual, service, and policy levels. This three-level framework is a conceptual implication of the qualitative findings and requires evaluation in larger and more diverse settings.
SN  - 1179-1322
ER  -