Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer: Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center in Türkiye
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06200, Türkiye
- 2Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ministry of Health Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06230, Türkiye
- 3Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara 06170, Türkiye
- 4Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara 06800, Türkiye
Abstract
Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has become an established alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging in endometrial cancer. This study evaluated SLN mapping rates, anatomical distribution, factors associated with mapping failure, and perioperative outcomes in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent SLN mapping during minimally invasive surgical staging between September 2022 and January 2025. Overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were calculated. Anatomical distribution of SLNs, factors associated with mapping failure (including a hemipelvis-level generalized estimating equation [GEE] analysis), and perioperative outcomes according to surgical approach were analyzed. Results: A total of 165 patients were included. The overall SLN detection rate was 96.4%, and bilateral mapping was achieved in 125 patients (75.8%). A total of 584 SLNs were removed, most commonly from the iliac basin. In the hemipelvis-level GEE analysis (330 hemipelves, 46 failures), ICG use (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–18.83) and, in a sensitivity model, conventional laparoscopy compared with robotic surgery (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.14–4.69) were associated with higher odds of mapping failure, whereas age and BMI were not. Operative time and intraoperative complication rates were comparable among laparoscopic, robotic-assisted, and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) procedures. Postoperative complication rates and length of hospital stay differed significantly across surgical approaches (both p = 0.002); post hoc pairwise comparison of complication rates showed that the difference was driven mainly by conventional laparoscopy compared with robotic-assisted surgery, whereas the small vNOTES group (n = 8) did not differ significantly from either approach and does not permit conclusions on its comparative safety. Conclusions: SLN mapping demonstrated high overall detection rates and acceptable bilateral mapping success in early-stage endometrial cancer. These findings support the feasibility of SLN mapping as a minimally invasive staging strategy in routine clinical practice.
Related
- Learning Curve and Detection Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer Staging: Experience from an ESGO & GESEA Certified Center
- Clinical manifestations, genetic characteristics and laboratory markers of patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a single tertiary referral center experience
- Pulmonary metastasectomy in solid tumors: a single-center experience at a tertiary referral center in the Middle East.
- Sentinel Lymph Node Assessment in Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia/Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Clinicopathological Study and Assessment of Caregiver Quality of Life at a Tertiary Neurosurgical Referral Center in Northern India
BibTeX
@article{turmus2026sentinel,
title = {{Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer: Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center in Türkiye}},
author = {Eyüp Gökhan Turmuş and Okan Oktar and Hande Esra Koca Yildirim and Baran Yeşil and Mustafa Taze and Nigar Mammadova and İzzet Özgürlük and Çiğdem Kılıç and Burak Ersak and Caner Çakır},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15218410},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8410},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer: Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center in Türkiye
AU - Eyüp Gökhan Turmuş
AU - Okan Oktar
AU - Hande Esra Koca Yildirim
AU - Baran Yeşil
AU - Mustafa Taze
AU - Nigar Mammadova
AU - İzzet Özgürlük
AU - Çiğdem Kılıç
AU - Burak Ersak
AU - Caner Çakır
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/29
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15218410
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8410
AB - Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has become an established alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging in endometrial cancer. This study evaluated SLN mapping rates, anatomical distribution, factors associated with mapping failure, and perioperative outcomes in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent SLN mapping during minimally invasive surgical staging between September 2022 and January 2025. Overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were calculated. Anatomical distribution of SLNs, factors associated with mapping failure (including a hemipelvis-level generalized estimating equation [GEE] analysis), and perioperative outcomes according to surgical approach were analyzed. Results: A total of 165 patients were included. The overall SLN detection rate was 96.4%, and bilateral mapping was achieved in 125 patients (75.8%). A total of 584 SLNs were removed, most commonly from the iliac basin. In the hemipelvis-level GEE analysis (330 hemipelves, 46 failures), ICG use (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–18.83) and, in a sensitivity model, conventional laparoscopy compared with robotic surgery (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.14–4.69) were associated with higher odds of mapping failure, whereas age and BMI were not. Operative time and intraoperative complication rates were comparable among laparoscopic, robotic-assisted, and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) procedures. Postoperative complication rates and length of hospital stay differed significantly across surgical approaches (both p = 0.002); post hoc pairwise comparison of complication rates showed that the difference was driven mainly by conventional laparoscopy compared with robotic-assisted surgery, whereas the small vNOTES group (n = 8) did not differ significantly from either approach and does not permit conclusions on its comparative safety. Conclusions: SLN mapping demonstrated high overall detection rates and acceptable bilateral mapping success in early-stage endometrial cancer. These findings support the feasibility of SLN mapping as a minimally invasive staging strategy in routine clinical practice.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -