Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Biomolecules

Circulating MicroRNAs as Molecular Biomarkers of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Candidate-Centered Evidence Map

  1. 1Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, Goiás, Brazil
  2. 2School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás, Goiânia 74605-010, Goiás, Brazil
  3. 3Postgraduate Program in Genetics, Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás, Goiânia 74605-010, Goiás, Brazil

Abstract

Background: Recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains difficult to predict. Circulating microRNAs may reflect molecular substrates not captured by established predictors. We mapped recurrence-specific evidence and identified priorities for prospective validation. Methods: Six databases were searched from inception through 29 August 2026 for adult AF ablation cohorts measuring circulating microRNAs before or around ablation and reporting atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Recurrence-specific reports were assessed with the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. A post hoc candidate-centered framework required direct recurrence evidence in at least two analytically distinct samples and support in at least one additional clinical, mechanistic, or analytical domain. Candidate-specific certainty was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Thirty-five publications represented 29 linked programs; 26 recurrence-specific reports represented 25 independent cohorts (3309 enrolled; 3205 analyzed), and nine publications provided longitudinal context. Six microRNAs were identified as priorities for prospective validation: miR-21-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-29b-3p, miR-451a, miR-10b-5p, and miR-320a. Their evidence differed in mature-arm identity, matrix, sampling compartment, assay scale, biological source, and mechanistic support. Candidate-specific certainty was very low. Conclusions: The evidence supports candidate-specific prospective validation rather than a uniform circulating-microRNA class effect. Standardized preanalytics, mature-arm and carrier attribution, locked assays, and multicenter incremental-prediction studies are required before clinical utility can be established.

Related

  1. Circulating microRNAs Associated with Insulin Resistance in South Asian and European Adults with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D): A Systematic Review and Mapping of Ethnic Patterns
    Talia Kimber, David J. Hunter, Elizabeth C. Akam +3
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General biochemistryCrossref
  2. Study of microRNAs-21/221 as potential breast cancer biomarkers in Egyptian women
    Tarek Mohamed Kamal Motawi, Nermin Abdel Hamid Sadik, Olfat Gamil Shaker +2
    GenePeer-reviewedLicence not stated44 citedProteomics & metabolomicsGenetics & genomicsHAL
  3. Exosomal microRNAs as biomarkers of multimorbidity risk in lean and obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome
    Debarati Halder, P. V. Varshini, Tridip Mitra +7
    Frontiers in molecular biosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  4. Fluorosphere-Assisted Nano-Biosensor for Detection of Circulating microRNAs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    P. K. Mishra, R. Shandilya, A. Bhargava +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  5. Aqueous humor exosomal microRNAs as emerging biomarkers in HSV-1 anterior uveitis
    Maria Carmela Saturno, Dimitrios Kalogeropoulos, Elena Carbone +5
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
BibTeX
@article{menezes2026circulating,
  title = {{Circulating MicroRNAs as Molecular Biomarkers of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Candidate-Centered Evidence Map}},
  author = {Antônio da Silva Menezes and Arthur de Sousa Silva and Alcir Júnior de Paula Nunes Meneses and Annelyse Vitória Souza Barbosa and Aparecido Divino da Cruz},
  journal = {Biomolecules},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/biom16111590},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/16/11/1590},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Circulating MicroRNAs as Molecular Biomarkers of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Candidate-Centered Evidence Map
AU  - Antônio da Silva Menezes
AU  - Arthur de Sousa Silva
AU  - Alcir Júnior de Paula Nunes Meneses
AU  - Annelyse Vitória Souza Barbosa
AU  - Aparecido Divino da Cruz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - Biomolecules
DO  - 10.3390/biom16111590
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/16/11/1590
AB  - Background: Recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains difficult to predict. Circulating microRNAs may reflect molecular substrates not captured by established predictors. We mapped recurrence-specific evidence and identified priorities for prospective validation. Methods: Six databases were searched from inception through 29 August 2026 for adult AF ablation cohorts measuring circulating microRNAs before or around ablation and reporting atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Recurrence-specific reports were assessed with the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. A post hoc candidate-centered framework required direct recurrence evidence in at least two analytically distinct samples and support in at least one additional clinical, mechanistic, or analytical domain. Candidate-specific certainty was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Thirty-five publications represented 29 linked programs; 26 recurrence-specific reports represented 25 independent cohorts (3309 enrolled; 3205 analyzed), and nine publications provided longitudinal context. Six microRNAs were identified as priorities for prospective validation: miR-21-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-29b-3p, miR-451a, miR-10b-5p, and miR-320a. Their evidence differed in mature-arm identity, matrix, sampling compartment, assay scale, biological source, and mechanistic support. Candidate-specific certainty was very low. Conclusions: The evidence supports candidate-specific prospective validation rather than a uniform circulating-microRNA class effect. Standardized preanalytics, mature-arm and carrier attribution, locked assays, and multicenter incremental-prediction studies are required before clinical utility can be established.
SN  - 2218-273X
ER  -