Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in medicine

Perceived must see pediatric conditions vs. actual clinical exposure during an undergraduate pediatrics clerkship.

  1. 1College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin, United Arab Emirates.

Abstract

Background

Undergraduate pediatric rotations aim to provide authentic exposure to core conditions. Programs often publish "must-see" lists, but student and doctor perceived priorities may not reflect real-world case-mix. We compared student/doctor perceived must-see topics with the diagnoses and presentations they actually encountered.Methods

Cross-sectional comparison of a perception dataset (49 participants: 39 medical students and 10 doctors; 81 presentation-illness pairs, mean ± SEM on a 1-5 scale) and an electronic logbook of clinical encounters. Free-text logbook fields were normalized, segmented, and classified as presentations or diagnoses by the authors and were not independently reviewed. We computed documented diagnosis and presentation frequencies, mapped survey pairs to observed labels, and examined alignment using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Mapping coverage and discrepant priority-exposure patterns were summarized descriptively.Results

The logbook comprised 5,179 encounters. After normalization and mapping, 63% (51/81) of survey pairs had at least one documented match. Spearman's rank correlations were ρ = 0.713 for diagnosis pairs (n = 15, p = 0.003, 95% CI = 0.32-0.90) and ρ = 0.087 for presentation pairs (n = 11, p = 0.800, 95% CI = -0.54-0.65). Respiratory and gastrointestinal conditions were prominent in both datasets. No mapped logbook entry was found for innocent/pathologic heart murmur, but this may reflect limited exposure, documentation omission, or mapping/capture error rather than confirmed absence. Hydronephrosis was documented 12 times despite a perceived rank of 70.Conclusions

The logbook documented frequent exposure to several common core conditions that students and doctors valued, while some high-priority items had few or no mapped entries. Because absence from a free-text logbook is not proof of no clinical exposure, structured chief-complaint and final-diagnosis fields, mapping validation, targeted simulation/virtual cases, and data-informed scheduling may improve both documentation and equitable curricular coverage.

Related

  1. A novel, free regional conference model to increase interest and engagement of medical trainees in pediatrics and pediatric gastroenterology research
    Mahnoor Memon, Shahzaib Khan, Christina Guillen +1
    JPGN reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Evaluation of the California American Academy of Pediatrics Resident Advocacy Rotation: A State-Wide Collaborative Approach to Teaching Advocacy to Pediatric Trainees
    Vivien K Sun, Cambria Garell, Susan Wu
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  3. Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers regarding artificial intelligence among undergraduate nursing students in Somalia: A cross-sectional study
    Abdullahi Hassan Elmi, Rasha Kadri Ibrahim
    Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  4. Psychometric evaluation of the persian version of the Social Self-Compassion Scale (SSCS): associations with Perceived Social Self-Efficacy, fear of negative evaluation, and loneliness among female undergraduate students.
    Azadeh Taheri, Roghieh Nooripour, Mohammadreza Shabanzadeh +2
    BMC psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  5. Evaluating the effects of the educational course on undergraduate students' perceived knowledge, attitude, and motivation: a quasi-experimental study in Iran.
    Mehri Maleki, Bahram Amirshakeri, Ali Jahan +1
    BMC medical educationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{ahbabi2026perceived,
  title = {{Perceived must see pediatric conditions vs. actual clinical exposure during an undergraduate pediatrics clerkship.}},
  author = {Hamed Al Ahbabi and Omar Tafech and Hassan Ballas and Mohammed Al-Zaabi and Mohammed Al-Blooshi and Ahmed Alsuwaidi and Elhadi H Aburawi and S Ayhan Çalışkan and Awad Al Essa and Imran Zafar and Sami Shaban and Mohi Eldin Magzoub},
  journal = {Frontiers in medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1876315},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908573},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Perceived must see pediatric conditions vs. actual clinical exposure during an undergraduate pediatrics clerkship.
AU  - Hamed Al Ahbabi
AU  - Omar Tafech
AU  - Hassan Ballas
AU  - Mohammed Al-Zaabi
AU  - Mohammed Al-Blooshi
AU  - Ahmed Alsuwaidi
AU  - Elhadi H Aburawi
AU  - S Ayhan Çalışkan
AU  - Awad Al Essa
AU  - Imran Zafar
AU  - Sami Shaban
AU  - Mohi Eldin Magzoub
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Frontiers in medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1876315
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908573
AB  - Background  Undergraduate pediatric rotations aim to provide authentic exposure to core conditions. Programs often publish "must-see" lists, but student and doctor perceived priorities may not reflect real-world case-mix. We compared student/doctor perceived must-see topics with the diagnoses and presentations they actually encountered.Methods  Cross-sectional comparison of a perception dataset (49 participants: 39 medical students and 10 doctors; 81 presentation-illness pairs, mean ± SEM on a 1-5 scale) and an electronic logbook of clinical encounters. Free-text logbook fields were normalized, segmented, and classified as presentations or diagnoses by the authors and were not independently reviewed. We computed documented diagnosis and presentation frequencies, mapped survey pairs to observed labels, and examined alignment using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Mapping coverage and discrepant priority-exposure patterns were summarized descriptively.Results  The logbook comprised 5,179 encounters. After normalization and mapping, 63% (51/81) of survey pairs had at least one documented match. Spearman's rank correlations were ρ = 0.713 for diagnosis pairs (n = 15, p = 0.003, 95% CI = 0.32-0.90) and ρ = 0.087 for presentation pairs (n = 11, p = 0.800, 95% CI = -0.54-0.65). Respiratory and gastrointestinal conditions were prominent in both datasets. No mapped logbook entry was found for innocent/pathologic heart murmur, but this may reflect limited exposure, documentation omission, or mapping/capture error rather than confirmed absence. Hydronephrosis was documented 12 times despite a perceived rank of 70.Conclusions  The logbook documented frequent exposure to several common core conditions that students and doctors valued, while some high-priority items had few or no mapped entries. Because absence from a free-text logbook is not proof of no clinical exposure, structured chief-complaint and final-diagnosis fields, mapping validation, targeted simulation/virtual cases, and data-informed scheduling may improve both documentation and equitable curricular coverage.
SN  - 2296-858X
ER  -