Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYScientific Reports

General semantic, personal semantic and episodic details when thinking about the past and the future in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury

  1. 1Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  2. 2Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  3. 3School of Psychology, University of East Anglia

Abstract

Relational memory supports the binding of the arbitrary relations between elements of experience to create durable representations of our lives over time, an ability that is disrupted following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Much of the work on relational memory in TBI comes from studies on the recall of specific events from one’s personal past, that is, episodic memory. Recent work suggests relational memory may also be recruited in support of representations of general semantics (i.e., knowledge of the world) and personal semantics (i.e., knowledge about the self and one’s life). In the present study, we assessed whether the repercussions of TBI on relational memory extend beyond episodic memory to include aspects of general and personal semantics using similar tasks focused on elaboration. Thirty individuals with moderate-severe TBI and 30 non-injured participants (NCs) generated narratives across four life chapters (adolescence, remote past, recent past, future) and three memory types (general semantics, personal semantics, and episodic memory). A mixed effects model revealed a significant effect of Group, without any interaction, consistent with the TBI group having generated fewer details than the NC group across all chapters and memory types. The provision of specific probes reduced the differences between groups, except for the autobiographical facts of the future chapter. The study assessed a uniquely large spectrum of memory types and showed that relational memory dysfunction in TBI extends beyond episodic memory to include aspects of general and personal semantics, for both the past and future.

Related

  1. Applications of episodic future thinking in patients with chronic diseases: a scoping review
    Ranran Song, Nana Chen, Xinru Huang +5
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  2. Psychosis-associated disruptions to semantic foraging in narrative recollections: Integrating language model embeddings and topic modeling
    Luke Leckie, Nancy B. Lundin, Amanda R. Bolbecker +6
    Journal of psychopathology and clinical sciencePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  3. Evidence of Preserved Function in Semantic Dementia
    Chelsea-Leigh Marie McKenzie, Melissa Meade, Marieke Mur +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  4. Retrospective harmonization of neuropsychiatric questionnaires in a large multi-site research consortium using expert mappings and semantic textual similarity
    Julia-Katharina Pfarr, Eva van Heese, Joshua Curtiss +7
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  5. The Nature of Phonological Impairments in Dyslexia and Stuttering: Evidence from Phonemic, Semantic, and Design Fluency Tasks
    Mahmoud Elsherif, James H Smith-Spark, Richard Kirkden
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
BibTeX
@article{tanguay2026general,
  title = {{General semantic, personal semantic and episodic details when thinking about the past and the future in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury}},
  author = {Annick F. N. Tanguay and Sharice Clough and Natalia B. Rivera and Greta Melega and Louis Renoult and Melissa C. Duff},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-60098-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-60098-5},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - General semantic, personal semantic and episodic details when thinking about the past and the future in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury
AU  - Annick F. N. Tanguay
AU  - Sharice Clough
AU  - Natalia B. Rivera
AU  - Greta Melega
AU  - Louis Renoult
AU  - Melissa C. Duff
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-60098-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-60098-5
AB  - Relational memory supports the binding of the arbitrary relations between elements of experience to create durable representations of our lives over time, an ability that is disrupted following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Much of the work on relational memory in TBI comes from studies on the recall of specific events from one’s personal past, that is, episodic memory. Recent work suggests relational memory may also be recruited in support of representations of general semantics (i.e., knowledge of the world) and personal semantics (i.e., knowledge about the self and one’s life). In the present study, we assessed whether the repercussions of TBI on relational memory extend beyond episodic memory to include aspects of general and personal semantics using similar tasks focused on elaboration. Thirty individuals with moderate-severe TBI and 30 non-injured participants (NCs) generated narratives across four life chapters (adolescence, remote past, recent past, future) and three memory types (general semantics, personal semantics, and episodic memory). A mixed effects model revealed a significant effect of Group, without any interaction, consistent with the TBI group having generated fewer details than the NC group across all chapters and memory types. The provision of specific probes reduced the differences between groups, except for the autobiographical facts of the future chapter. The study assessed a uniquely large spectrum of memory types and showed that relational memory dysfunction in TBI extends beyond episodic memory to include aspects of general and personal semantics, for both the past and future.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -