Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,460 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBJPsych Open

Evaluating social cognitive remediation for labour participation in severe mental illness: insights from a small-scale randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Background Employment rates remain critically low among individuals with severe mental illness. Although social cognition explains a significant portion of the variance in functional outcomes, research into social cognitive interventions has remained scarce. Aims To evaluate the impact of a social cognitive remediation (SCR) programme on functional and psychological outcomes over a 6-month post-intervention period. Method This randomised controlled trial was conducted across three sheltered employment centres in France (2020–2024; ClinicalTrials.gov protocol record: 2019-A00124-53). We evaluated the efficacy of a 12-week SCR programme versus an active control with respect to the ratio of hours effectively worked versus those expected at 6 months post treatment (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported measures of self-esteem, internalised stigma, recovery and anxiety. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects were estimated using targeted minimum loss-based estimation, with attrition accounted for through inverse probability of censoring weights. Results Of the 105 randomised participants (SCR: n = 53; control: n = 52; mean age: 35.6 [s.d. = 8.8] years; 71% male), 39 dropped out, yielding a per-protocol sample of 33 participants per arm. Attrition was 28% immediately after the intervention and 37% at 6-month follow-up. SCR was associated with a 6.5% increase in the ratio of hours worked versus those expected in the intention-to-treat analysis and a 3.6% increase in the per-protocol analysis (both P < 0.05). SCR also reduced internalised stigma at 6 months post treatment ( P < 0.03). Conclusions Our findings suggest that a 3-month SCR programme improves employment maintenance and reduces internalised stigma in individuals with severe mental illness. Future research should use larger samples and improve retention to confirm these findings.

Related

  1. Chess-based cognitive remediation training as an add-on intervention treatment for alcohol use disorder: A quasi-randomized clinical trial
    Alexandra Seeger, Alexander Kinzel, Kathrin Matthiae +8
    Neuropsychological RehabilitationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeuroscienceEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. Effect of different forms of upper limb muscle training on dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
    Marc Beaumont, Loic Péran, Anne Cécile Berriet +3
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicinePeer-reviewedLicence not stated2 citedGeneral biologyHAL
  3. Efficacy and tolerability of a cocktail of bacteriophages to treat burn wounds infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PhagoBurn): a randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 1/2 trial
    Patrick Jault, Thomas Leclerc, Serge Jennes +13
    The Lancet Infectious DiseasesPeer-reviewedLicence not stated878 citedEcologyHAL
  4. Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during a large, live, indoor gathering (SPRING): a non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial
    Constance Delaugerre, Frantz Foissac, Hendy Abdoul +18
    The Lancet Infectious DiseasesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text48 citedGeneral biologyHAL
  5. Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial
    Jérémy Guenezan, Nicolas Marjanovic, Bertrand Drugeon +11
    The Lancet Infectious DiseasesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text64 citedGeneral biologyInfectious diseaseHAL
BibTeX
@article{barbalat2026evaluating,
  title = {{Evaluating social cognitive remediation for labour participation in severe mental illness: insights from a small-scale randomised controlled trial}},
  author = {Guillaume Barbalat and Julien Plasse and Marie-Cécile Bralet and Sophie Cervello and Nicolas Franck},
  journal = {BJPsych Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1192/bjo.2026.12124},
  url = {https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-05799672v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating social cognitive remediation for labour participation in severe mental illness: insights from a small-scale randomised controlled trial
AU  - Guillaume Barbalat
AU  - Julien Plasse
AU  - Marie-Cécile Bralet
AU  - Sophie Cervello
AU  - Nicolas Franck
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - BJPsych Open
DO  - 10.1192/bjo.2026.12124
UR  - https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-05799672v1
AB  - Background Employment rates remain critically low among individuals with severe mental illness. Although social cognition explains a significant portion of the variance in functional outcomes, research into social cognitive interventions has remained scarce. Aims To evaluate the impact of a social cognitive remediation (SCR) programme on functional and psychological outcomes over a 6-month post-intervention period. Method This randomised controlled trial was conducted across three sheltered employment centres in France (2020–2024; ClinicalTrials.gov protocol record: 2019-A00124-53). We evaluated the efficacy of a 12-week SCR programme versus an active control with respect to the ratio of hours effectively worked versus those expected at 6 months post treatment (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported measures of self-esteem, internalised stigma, recovery and anxiety. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects were estimated using targeted minimum loss-based estimation, with attrition accounted for through inverse probability of censoring weights. Results Of the 105 randomised participants (SCR: n = 53; control: n = 52; mean age: 35.6 [s.d. = 8.8] years; 71% male), 39 dropped out, yielding a per-protocol sample of 33 participants per arm. Attrition was 28% immediately after the intervention and 37% at 6-month follow-up. SCR was associated with a 6.5% increase in the ratio of hours worked versus those expected in the intention-to-treat analysis and a 3.6% increase in the per-protocol analysis (both P < 0.05). SCR also reduced internalised stigma at 6 months post treatment ( P < 0.03). Conclusions Our findings suggest that a 3-month SCR programme improves employment maintenance and reduces internalised stigma in individuals with severe mental illness. Future research should use larger samples and improve retention to confirm these findings.
SN  - 2056-4724
ER  -