Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYMedical physics

Impact of correlated PBPK parameters on intra-patient global sensitivity analysis in molecular radiotherapy.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  2. 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  3. 3Medical Physics and Biophysics, Physics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
  4. 4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Abstract

Background

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models integrated into digital twins provide a robust framework for optimizing individualized molecular radiotherapy (MRT). Nevertheless, uncertainties in PBPK-model-derived dosimetry can compromise the reliability of dosimetry-guided treatment planning and individualized therapy decisions.Purpose

This study employs intra-patient global sensitivity analysis (GSA) to assess the influence of uncertainty and correlations among PBPK model parameters on estimated kidney and tumor absorbed doses (ADs) in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted theragnostics.Methods

Data from 10 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent pre-therapeutic [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT and a cycle of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy, followed by post-therapeutic SPECT/CT scans at Days 1 and 4 post-injection, were analyzed. A previously established whole-body PBPK model for PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy was used as the baseline model. Fifteen model parameters, their standard errors, and inter-parameter correlations were estimated by fitting to measured time-activity data and subsequently evaluated using intra-patient GSA based on the Kucherenko method implemented in UQLab. In one approach, correlations were ignored to identify the direct influences of uncertainty in input parameters on ADs. In a second approach, correlations were included to reflect realistic parameter distributions and to capture indirect effects arising from parameter interdependencies. Pharmacokinetics were simulated to estimate therapeutic kidney and tumor ADs as well as main- and total-effect indices ( Si,SiT) . Sensitivity indices, ADs, and their associated uncertainty metrics were compared between scenarios with and without parameter correlations.Results

Including parameter correlations in the GSA yielded kidney ADs of 4.2 Gy [3.0-7.2 Gy] (median [min-max]) with standard deviations (SDs) of 0.5 Gy [0.4-0.9 Gy] and tumor ADs of 10.1 Gy [2.0-26.8 Gy] with SDs of 1.7 Gy [0.6-3.4 Gy]. Neglecting correlations resulted in significantly higher uncertainties in ADs, by a factor of 1.2 [1.0-1.8] for both kidneys and tumors. Kidney ADs were most sensitive to kidney receptor density ( Si=0.3[0.1-0.6], SiT=0.7[0.6-0.8] ) and to the filtered fraction of renal blood flow (Si=0.2[0.1-0.3], SiT=0.3[0.1-0.4]) . Tumor ADs were most affected by tumor receptor density ( Si=0.7[0.1-1.0], SiT=0.8[0.3-1.0] ). The involvement of parameter correlations did not alter the identification of the parameters most influential on AD estimates and further reduced computational runtime.Conclusions

Incorporating parameter correlations into intra-patient GSA reduced the estimated uncertainty associated with ADs, underscoring the importance of preserving parameter dependencies when propagating uncertainty in PBPK-based individualized MRT. The identification of key PBPK parameters governing kidney and tumor ADs remained stable when including correlation, confirming the robustness of the underlying model structure.

Related

  1. Perspective: Do Fasting, Caloric Restriction, and Diets Increase Sensitivity to Radiotherapy? A Literature Review
    Philippe Icard, Luc Ollivier, Patricia Forgez +5
    Advances in NutritionPeer-reviewedLicence not stated25 citedImmunologySystems & synthetic biologyHAL
  2. Calendar-defined missed-workday gaps in radiotherapy: a site- and phase-stratified audit with linkage sensitivity analyses.
    Runhong Lei, Yongping Zheng, Yi Chen +3
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  3. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Does Molecular Hydrogen Exert Radioprotective Effects Without Compromising the Antitumor Efficacy of Radiotherapy or Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy?
    Yu Ivy Zhang, Michiko Miyakawa, Ayako Miyakawa
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Adjuvant radiotherapy in FIGO stage III dMMR endometrial cancer: evidence and perspectives in the molecular era
    Gabriella Macchia, AnnaMaria Merlotti, Francesca De Felice +3
    EClinicalMedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Worsening of Oral Health Parameters After Head and Neck Radiotherapy-Findings from a Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Tumor Board: A Prospective Observational Study.
    Cosimo Rupe, Gioele Gioco, Benedetta Corraro +13
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{yousefzadehnowshahr2026impact,
  title = {{Impact of correlated PBPK parameters on intra-patient global sensitivity analysis in molecular radiotherapy.}},
  author = {Elham Yousefzadeh-Nowshahr and Deni Hardiansyah and Valentina Vasic and Anna-Lena Theisen and Johannes Tran-Gia and Philipp E Hartrampf and Ambros J Beer and Michael Lassmann and Gerhard Glatting},
  journal = {Medical physics},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1002/mp.70746},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42973155},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of correlated PBPK parameters on intra-patient global sensitivity analysis in molecular radiotherapy.
AU  - Elham Yousefzadeh-Nowshahr
AU  - Deni Hardiansyah
AU  - Valentina Vasic
AU  - Anna-Lena Theisen
AU  - Johannes Tran-Gia
AU  - Philipp E Hartrampf
AU  - Ambros J Beer
AU  - Michael Lassmann
AU  - Gerhard Glatting
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Medical physics
DO  - 10.1002/mp.70746
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42973155
AB  - Background  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models integrated into digital twins provide a robust framework for optimizing individualized molecular radiotherapy (MRT). Nevertheless, uncertainties in PBPK-model-derived dosimetry can compromise the reliability of dosimetry-guided treatment planning and individualized therapy decisions.Purpose  This study employs intra-patient global sensitivity analysis (GSA) to assess the influence of uncertainty and correlations among PBPK model parameters on estimated kidney and tumor absorbed doses (ADs) in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted theragnostics.Methods  Data from 10 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent pre-therapeutic [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT and a cycle of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy, followed by post-therapeutic SPECT/CT scans at Days 1 and 4 post-injection, were analyzed. A previously established whole-body PBPK model for PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy was used as the baseline model. Fifteen model parameters, their standard errors, and inter-parameter correlations were estimated by fitting to measured time-activity data and subsequently evaluated using intra-patient GSA based on the Kucherenko method implemented in UQLab. In one approach, correlations were ignored to identify the direct influences of uncertainty in input parameters on ADs. In a second approach, correlations were included to reflect realistic parameter distributions and to capture indirect effects arising from parameter interdependencies. Pharmacokinetics were simulated to estimate therapeutic kidney and tumor ADs as well as main- and total-effect indices ( Si,SiT) . Sensitivity indices, ADs, and their associated uncertainty metrics were compared between scenarios with and without parameter correlations.Results  Including parameter correlations in the GSA yielded kidney ADs of 4.2 Gy [3.0-7.2 Gy] (median [min-max]) with standard deviations (SDs) of 0.5 Gy [0.4-0.9 Gy] and tumor ADs of 10.1 Gy [2.0-26.8 Gy] with SDs of 1.7 Gy [0.6-3.4 Gy]. Neglecting correlations resulted in significantly higher uncertainties in ADs, by a factor of 1.2 [1.0-1.8] for both kidneys and tumors. Kidney ADs were most sensitive to kidney receptor density ( Si=0.3[0.1-0.6], SiT=0.7[0.6-0.8] ) and to the filtered fraction of renal blood flow (Si=0.2[0.1-0.3], SiT=0.3[0.1-0.4]) . Tumor ADs were most affected by tumor receptor density ( Si=0.7[0.1-1.0], SiT=0.8[0.3-1.0] ). The involvement of parameter correlations did not alter the identification of the parameters most influential on AD estimates and further reduced computational runtime.Conclusions  Incorporating parameter correlations into intra-patient GSA reduced the estimated uncertainty associated with ADs, underscoring the importance of preserving parameter dependencies when propagating uncertainty in PBPK-based individualized MRT. The identification of key PBPK parameters governing kidney and tumor ADs remained stable when including correlation, confirming the robustness of the underlying model structure.
SN  - 0094-2405
SN  - 2473-4209
ER  -