Effects of front-of-pack environmental labels on consumer understanding and food choices
Abstract
Introduction: Front‑of‑pack environmental labels (FoPELs) may support sustainable food choices, yet comparative evidence on the effectiveness of various FoPEL types remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of five FoPELs in improving consumers’ objective understanding and food choice.
Methods: An online randomised choice experiment was conducted among 2,007 Australian adults. Participants completed choice and ranking tasks for three food categories (snack bars, soups, burger patties) before and after randomisation to one of five FoPELs: Planet‑Score, Planetary Health Rating (PHR), Green‑Score, Enviroscore, or Eco‑Impact. Descriptive analyses assessed pre‑ and post‑exposure changes. Differences between FoPELs were examined using multivariable ordinal logistic regression adjusted for demographics, dietary pattern, and self‑reported sustainability knowledge.
Results: Descriptive analysis showed that all FoPELs improved participants’ objective understanding, with larger effects observed for ranking accuracy than for food choice across the food categories. In regression analyses, participants exposed to the PHR and Eco-Impact were almost twice as likely to show improved ranking accuracy for snack bars and soups (all <0.001) compared to the reference label (Green-Score). For food choice, the PHR was associated with higher odds of improvement for snack bars (p = 0.003) compared to Green-Score. Overall, the PHR performed consistently well across both outcomes.
Conclusions: FoPELs have the potential to meaningfully enhance consumers’ ability to distinguish foods by environmental sustainability, although immediate impacts on food choice were modest. Differences across FoPELs and food categories highlight the importance of label format and context in shaping consumer responses.
Key messages: • Sustainability labels improve consumers’ understanding of food sustainability, with stronger effects for understanding than on immediate shifts in food choice.
• Label effectiveness varies by design and food category, highlighting the importance of choosing appropriate formats to support sustainable food decisions.
Related
- Methods to assess front-of-pack label effects on consumer choice, purchase and purchasing intention
- Understanding research practices and methodological choices when applying the Person-Based Approach to health intervention development: A qualitative interview study
- The Ability of Nutrition Warning Labels to Improve Understanding and Choice Outcomes Among Consumers Demonstrating Preferences for Unhealthy Foods
- Understanding lymphatic filariasis risk in endemic regions: Associations with preventive behaviours, environmental factors, and other mosquito-borne diseases
- Generating cell-level protein-expression labels on HE from serial-section immunohistochemistry, with ground-truth-free quality control
BibTeX
@article{sengupta2026effects,
title = {{Effects of front-of-pack environmental labels on consumer understanding and food choices}},
author = {A Sengupta and P Seferidi and C Ni Mhurchu and S Pettigrew},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.2064},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.2064},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Effects of front-of-pack environmental labels on consumer understanding and food choices
AU - A Sengupta
AU - P Seferidi
AU - C Ni Mhurchu
AU - S Pettigrew
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.2064
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.2064
AB - Introduction: Front‑of‑pack environmental labels (FoPELs) may support sustainable food choices, yet comparative evidence on the effectiveness of various FoPEL types remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of five FoPELs in improving consumers’ objective understanding and food choice. Methods: An online randomised choice experiment was conducted among 2,007 Australian adults. Participants completed choice and ranking tasks for three food categories (snack bars, soups, burger patties) before and after randomisation to one of five FoPELs: Planet‑Score, Planetary Health Rating (PHR), Green‑Score, Enviroscore, or Eco‑Impact. Descriptive analyses assessed pre‑ and post‑exposure changes. Differences between FoPELs were examined using multivariable ordinal logistic regression adjusted for demographics, dietary pattern, and self‑reported sustainability knowledge. Results: Descriptive analysis showed that all FoPELs improved participants’ objective understanding, with larger effects observed for ranking accuracy than for food choice across the food categories. In regression analyses, participants exposed to the PHR and Eco-Impact were almost twice as likely to show improved ranking accuracy for snack bars and soups (all <0.001) compared to the reference label (Green-Score). For food choice, the PHR was associated with higher odds of improvement for snack bars (p = 0.003) compared to Green-Score. Overall, the PHR performed consistently well across both outcomes. Conclusions: FoPELs have the potential to meaningfully enhance consumers’ ability to distinguish foods by environmental sustainability, although immediate impacts on food choice were modest. Differences across FoPELs and food categories highlight the importance of label format and context in shaping consumer responses. Key messages: • Sustainability labels improve consumers’ understanding of food sustainability, with stronger effects for understanding than on immediate shifts in food choice. • Label effectiveness varies by design and food category, highlighting the importance of choosing appropriate formats to support sustainable food decisions.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -