Exploring internalized stigma among people living with psychosis and their caregivers: Insights from a community rehabilitation initiative in Malawi
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- 2Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
- 3Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- 4Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- 5Psychiatry Department, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Abstract
People living with psychosis (PWLE) experience, anticipate, and internalize stigma. Over time, experienced and anticipated stigma can increase internalized stigma, negatively impacting health. However, predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma among PWLE and their caregivers remain unknown. We explore how stigma changes over time; the associations between hypothesized predictors and internalized stigma; and how internalized stigma influences mental health and functional outcomes. We analyzed data from a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial comparing a community-based rehabilitation intervention to enhanced usual care in Blantyre, Malawi (NCT06080477). Sixty PWLE and 118 caregivers who met eligibility criteria completed interviewer-administered surveys at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) assessed the dimensionality of stigma scales. We used correlations and adjusted generalized estimating equations to examine associations between predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma. EFA supported single-factor structures with adequate internal consistency for most stigma scales. Among PWLE, mean internalized stigma, anticipated stigma, and experienced stigma decreased from baseline to 12 months in both arms. Stigma measures were generally comparable between arms except for family-enacted stigma, which was lower at 12 months among those receiving the intervention compared to usual care (mean difference = -0.97; -1.88, -0.05). At baseline, higher family-enacted stigma was moderately associated with higher internalized stigma scores (correlation coefficient = 0.34; 0.13, 0.53). Greater change in family-enacted stigma (regression coefficient = 0.24; 0.04, 0.43) and anticipated stigma (0.14; 0.02, 0.26) were weakly associated with greater change in internalized stigma. At baseline, internalized stigma was weakly associated with depressive (0.14; -0.08, 0.35) and anxiety symptoms (0.11; -0.08, 0.31). Over time, greater increases in internalized stigma were associated with higher anxiety (0.13; 0.01, 0.24). Caregivers’ internalized stigma decreased over 12 months, with no associated predictors. Anticipated, experienced, and internalized stigma are prevalent among PWLE in Malawi. Findings suggest the need to continue to explore the mechanisms between predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma.
Related
- Co-production using Theory of Change in the development of the SUCCEED Africa community-based rehabilitation intervention for people living with psychosis in West and Southeast Africa
- Exploring caregivers’ perspectives and anticipated acceptance of hepatitis B birth-dose vaccination before the national introduction in Sierra Leone: a qualitative study
- No significant differences between large language model prompting strategies and human experts in summarisation of 'the formal EU-US meniscus rehabilitation consensus: An ESSKA-AOSSM-AASPT Initiative'.
- Exploring sex-dependent responses to anodal tDCS in subacute stroke rehabilitation: a post-hoc analysis of the randomized sham-controlled NETS Trial
- Exploring sex-specific symptom trajectories in psychosis following metacognitive training (MCT): Evidence from a large-scale retrospective harmonized database
BibTeX
@article{buono2026exploring,
title = {{Exploring internalized stigma among people living with psychosis and their caregivers: Insights from a community rehabilitation initiative in Malawi}},
author = {Mia Buono and Kazione Kulisewa and Brian W. Pence and Bradley N. Gaynes and Abigail M. Morrison and Joshua Chienda and Melissa A. Stockton},
journal = {PLOS Mental Health},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pmen.0000753},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmen.0000753},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Exploring internalized stigma among people living with psychosis and their caregivers: Insights from a community rehabilitation initiative in Malawi
AU - Mia Buono
AU - Kazione Kulisewa
AU - Brian W. Pence
AU - Bradley N. Gaynes
AU - Abigail M. Morrison
AU - Joshua Chienda
AU - Melissa A. Stockton
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/05
JO - PLOS Mental Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pmen.0000753
UR - https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmen.0000753
AB - People living with psychosis (PWLE) experience, anticipate, and internalize stigma. Over time, experienced and anticipated stigma can increase internalized stigma, negatively impacting health. However, predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma among PWLE and their caregivers remain unknown. We explore how stigma changes over time; the associations between hypothesized predictors and internalized stigma; and how internalized stigma influences mental health and functional outcomes. We analyzed data from a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial comparing a community-based rehabilitation intervention to enhanced usual care in Blantyre, Malawi (NCT06080477). Sixty PWLE and 118 caregivers who met eligibility criteria completed interviewer-administered surveys at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) assessed the dimensionality of stigma scales. We used correlations and adjusted generalized estimating equations to examine associations between predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma. EFA supported single-factor structures with adequate internal consistency for most stigma scales. Among PWLE, mean internalized stigma, anticipated stigma, and experienced stigma decreased from baseline to 12 months in both arms. Stigma measures were generally comparable between arms except for family-enacted stigma, which was lower at 12 months among those receiving the intervention compared to usual care (mean difference = -0.97; -1.88, -0.05). At baseline, higher family-enacted stigma was moderately associated with higher internalized stigma scores (correlation coefficient = 0.34; 0.13, 0.53). Greater change in family-enacted stigma (regression coefficient = 0.24; 0.04, 0.43) and anticipated stigma (0.14; 0.02, 0.26) were weakly associated with greater change in internalized stigma. At baseline, internalized stigma was weakly associated with depressive (0.14; -0.08, 0.35) and anxiety symptoms (0.11; -0.08, 0.31). Over time, greater increases in internalized stigma were associated with higher anxiety (0.13; 0.01, 0.24). Caregivers’ internalized stigma decreased over 12 months, with no associated predictors. Anticipated, experienced, and internalized stigma are prevalent among PWLE in Malawi. Findings suggest the need to continue to explore the mechanisms between predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma.
SN - 2837-8156
ER -