Saturns Are Not Large Neptunes: The effect of removing inflated giants from empirical mass-radius relations
Abstract
Empirical mass-radius relations have long been used in exoplanetology to study planet demographics and to predict masses and radii for objects where only one of these is known. Inferred transitions between planet classes can also provide empirical evidence in support of theory. However, mass-radius relations fitted in two-dimensions can be complicated when additional factors influence the planetary parameters, as is the case with the radius inflation of giant planets. In this work, we present an empirical mass-radius relation derived by fitting a broken power-law to a cleaned PlanetS sample from which inflated giants have been removed. We find that when inflated giants are excluded, the preferred model contains three breakpoints and four segments, showing the emergence of a distinct Saturnian regime between 54±3 M⊕ <M< 258±11 M⊕. In this regime, planets are still growing but at a lower rate than the Neptunian regime, consistent with the onset of gravitational self-compression. We also update the irradiation threshold for giant planet inflation, Sthr=99 S⊕ (1.3 ergs s−1 cm−2); below Sthr, 90% of giant planets have a radius excess ΔlogR<2σ.
Versions
Related
- Pulsar Timing Array Sensitivity to Anisotropy: Empirical Sensitivity Curves, Scaling Relations, and the Multi-resolution Pixel Basis
- The DESIRED strong-line calibrations: I. New empirical metallicity relations for the local and high-redshift universe
- Companion architectures of sub-Saturns: Distinct migration pathways across the Neptunian landscape
- Companion architectures of sub-Saturns: Distinct migration pathways across the Neptunian landscape
- Water-rich sub-Neptunes and rocky super-Earths around different stars: Radii shaped by volatile partitioning, formation, and evolution
BibTeX
@misc{dransfield2026saturns,
title = {{Saturns Are Not Large Neptunes: The effect of removing inflated giants from empirical mass-radius relations}},
author = {Georgina Dransfield and Valentina Tardugno and Niamh K. O'Sullivan},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.17025},
eprint = {2609.17025},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17025},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Saturns Are Not Large Neptunes: The effect of removing inflated giants from empirical mass-radius relations
AU - Georgina Dransfield
AU - Valentina Tardugno
AU - Niamh K. O'Sullivan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/15
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.17025
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17025
AB - Empirical mass-radius relations have long been used in exoplanetology to study planet demographics and to predict masses and radii for objects where only one of these is known. Inferred transitions between planet classes can also provide empirical evidence in support of theory. However, mass-radius relations fitted in two-dimensions can be complicated when additional factors influence the planetary parameters, as is the case with the radius inflation of giant planets. In this work, we present an empirical mass-radius relation derived by fitting a broken power-law to a cleaned PlanetS sample from which inflated giants have been removed. We find that when inflated giants are excluded, the preferred model contains three breakpoints and four segments, showing the emergence of a distinct Saturnian regime between 54±3 M_⊕ <M< 258±11 M_⊕. In this regime, planets are still growing but at a lower rate than the Neptunian regime, consistent with the onset of gravitational self-compression. We also update the irradiation threshold for giant planet inflation, S_thr=99 S_⊕ (1.3 ergs s^−1 cm^−2); below S_thr, 90% of giant planets have a radius excess ΔlogR<2σ.
ER -