Navigating vaccine hesitancy: aligning perspectives of parents and healthcare professional

Abstract

Background: This study presents findings from the Behavioral Science in Public Health Team (BOND), a collaboration among seven Polish institutions focused on public health. In Poland, vaccination rates among children aged 0-6 have declined due to fears of adverse effects and eroding trust in healthcare. This study aims to explore the attitudes of parents and the perspectives of healthcare professionals regarding the causes of vaccine hesitancy. Utilizing behavioral science, the research seeks to unravel complexities of hesitancy and develop strategies to enhance public confidence in vaccinations.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach integrated qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The qualitative phase involved in-depth interviews with healthcare professionals based on the COM-B framework, conducted in 2025. For the quantitative phase, a survey was administered to 4,460 parents and guardians of children aged 0-6, in 2026. The survey included validated scales such as the Adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) and the 5C model (OECD), assessing Confidence, Complacency, Convenience, Risk Calculation, and Collective Responsibility.

Results: Qualitative findings highlighted barriers like time constraints and the need for empathetic communication. One provider noted, “Empathetic conversations can reduce parents’ doubts.” Quantitative results showed an average aVHS score of 3.2 (SD = 1.1), indicating moderate hesitancy. Notably, 72% of parents reported significant social influence on vaccination decisions. A significant correlation existed between confidence in vaccines and willingness to vaccinate (r = 0.45, p < 0.01), with 68% indicating encouragement from healthcare providers would enhance their likelihood of vaccinating.

Conclusions: The study underscores the complexity of vaccine hesitancy and the need to address systemic and psychological barriers. The BOND team will develop behavioral interventions based on these findings to improve vaccination rates in Poland.

Key messages: • Empathy matters: Effective communication between healthcare providers and parents is vital for addressing vaccine hesitancy, fostering trust, and encouraging informed vaccination decisions.

• Social influences are significant: Community beliefs and peer influences impact parents’ vaccination choices, helping professionals tailor strategies to enhance public trust in immunization.

Navigating adulthood with maple syrup urine disease: patient and caregiver perspectives on healthcare transition and independent living
Jessica I. Gold, Megan Grabill, Karen Dolins +3
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases1 Jul 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
Navigating failed induction of labor within maternity care systems: a qualitative study of women’s experiences and healthcare professionals’ perspectives
Yao Li, Linna Wei, Wanying Pang +5
Frontiers in Public Health9 Nov 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
Infant Skincare in India: Clinical Practices, Perceptions, and Evolving Perspectives from a Healthcare Professional Survey
H. Rizwan, B. J. Parmar, S. Mukherjee +3
medRxiv8 Sep 2026PreprintPublic domainFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
'All Under One Roof': Health Professional Perspectives on Integrating Musculoskeletal Pain Management in a Proximity-Based Primary Healthcare Model.
Shauna Fjaagesund, Gary Campbell, Wayne Graham +7
Musculoskeletal care30 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
Gender sensitivity and its implementation in inpatient cardiology: a mixed-methods study of patient and healthcare professional perspectives
Sophia Sgraja, Judith Mollenhauer, Martina Kloepfer +3
Frontiers in global women's health16 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@article{kleszczewska2026navigating,
  title = {{Navigating vaccine hesitancy: aligning perspectives of parents and healthcare professional}},
  author = {D Kleszczewska and J Krawiec and A Dzielska and Ł Balwicki and B Nawotczynski and P Matelska and A Sochoń-Latuszek and O Kalinowska and J Skowron and P Grzesiowski},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.515},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.515},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Navigating vaccine hesitancy: aligning perspectives of parents and healthcare professional
AU  - D Kleszczewska
AU  - J Krawiec
AU  - A Dzielska
AU  - Ł Balwicki
AU  - B Nawotczynski
AU  - P Matelska
AU  - A Sochoń-Latuszek
AU  - O Kalinowska
AU  - J Skowron
AU  - P Grzesiowski
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.515
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.515
AB  - Background: This study presents findings from the Behavioral Science in Public Health Team (BOND), a collaboration among seven Polish institutions focused on public health. In Poland, vaccination rates among children aged 0-6 have declined due to fears of adverse effects and eroding trust in healthcare. This study aims to explore the attitudes of parents and the perspectives of healthcare professionals regarding the causes of vaccine hesitancy. Utilizing behavioral science, the research seeks to unravel complexities of hesitancy and develop strategies to enhance public confidence in vaccinations.  Methods: A mixed-methods approach integrated qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The qualitative phase involved in-depth interviews with healthcare professionals based on the COM-B framework, conducted in 2025. For the quantitative phase, a survey was administered to 4,460 parents and guardians of children aged 0-6, in 2026. The survey included validated scales such as the Adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) and the 5C model (OECD), assessing Confidence, Complacency, Convenience, Risk Calculation, and Collective Responsibility.  Results: Qualitative findings highlighted barriers like time constraints and the need for empathetic communication. One provider noted, “Empathetic conversations can reduce parents’ doubts.” Quantitative results showed an average aVHS score of 3.2 (SD = 1.1), indicating moderate hesitancy. Notably, 72% of parents reported significant social influence on vaccination decisions. A significant correlation existed between confidence in vaccines and willingness to vaccinate (r = 0.45, p < 0.01), with 68% indicating encouragement from healthcare providers would enhance their likelihood of vaccinating.  Conclusions: The study underscores the complexity of vaccine hesitancy and the need to address systemic and psychological barriers. The BOND team will develop behavioral interventions based on these findings to improve vaccination rates in Poland.  Key messages: • Empathy matters: Effective communication between healthcare providers and parents is vital for addressing vaccine hesitancy, fostering trust, and encouraging informed vaccination decisions.  • Social influences are significant: Community beliefs and peer influences impact parents’ vaccination choices, helping professionals tailor strategies to enhance public trust in immunization.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite