Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Kidney International Reports

Improving the Diagnosis of Inherited Kidney Diseases Through Domain-Specific Databases

6 affiliations
  1. 1Departament d’Enginyeria de Sistemes, B2SLab, Automàtica i Informàtica Industrial, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
  2. 2Network Biomedical Research Centre for Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain
  3. 3Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
  4. 4Nephrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
  5. 5Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR-Sant Pau), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, RICORS2040 Renal, Barcelona, Spain
  6. 6Pediatric Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnostic accuracy of phenotype-matching tools for rare diseases depends not only on the algorithm but also on the quality of the disease definitions. Inherited kidney diseases (IKDs) pose a significant challenge for clinical diagnosis due to substantial phenotypic overlap and heterogeneity, but many patients remain undiagnosed despite growing access to genetic testing. This study assesses whether an expert-curated, IKD-specific database (CURATED) provides a closer phenotypic match to real patients than the Mondo Disease Ontology (MONDO), a broad, general-purpose resource.

Methods: Using a cohort of 340 real-world patients with genetically confirmed diagnoses across 8 IKD categories, we compared MONDO- and CURATED-based disease definitions across 3 independent, computational phenotype-matching tools (Phenomizer, Phrank, and Phen2Disease), which match Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO)-annotated patient phenotypes to disease profiles, using similarity scoring, diagnostic ranking, and mixed-effects models accounting for disease imbalance and interannotator variability.

Results: With CURATED definitions, similarity scores rose by 18%–30% and Discounted Cumulative Gain (DCG) improved by 15%–37% relative to MONDO, reflecting a stronger tendency across all 3 tools to place the correct diagnosis at or near the top of the ranked list. These improvements were maintained after mixed-effects modeling.

Conclusion: The quality of the underlying disease database can be as consequential as the choice of diagnostic algorithm. In this cohort, domain-specific curation improved diagnostic prioritization, suggesting that investment in high-quality, nephrology-specific phenotype resources may advance IKD diagnosis as much as further algorithmic refinement.

Related

  1. High rate of hypomorphic variants as the cause of inherited ataxia and related diseases: study of a cohort of 366 families
    Mehdi Benkirane, Cecilia Marelli, Claire Guissart +82
    Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewedLicence not stated28 citedGenetics & genomicsHAL
  2. Inherited metabolic diseases mimicking hereditary spastic paraplegia: a cohort of ten Egyptian patients
    Ola A. Khalifa, Tarek M. Youssef, Radwa G. Mahmoud
    Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMC
  3. Molecular Diagnostic Yield and Genotype-Phenotype Spectrum of Inherited Eye Diseases in a Tertiary Health Center in Türkiye.
    Muhammer Özgür Çevik
    Beyoglu eye journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
  4. Current translational perspectives for diagnosis and individualized therapy in rare genetic diseases
    Sarfaraz K. Niazi
    Communications MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsCrossref
  5. Improving mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes integrity as converging therapeutic strategy for rare neurodegenerative diseases and cancer
    Michal Cagalinec, Adnan Mohd, Silvia Borecka +18
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text14 citedNeuroscienceHAL
BibTeX
@article{leon2026improving,
  title = {{Improving the Diagnosis of Inherited Kidney Diseases Through Domain-Specific Databases}},
  author = {Rafael León and Leonor Fayos de Arizón and Elizabeth R. Viera and Joshua Llano Viles and Jordi Fonollosa and Mónica Furlano and Pedro Arango and Víctor López-Báez and Roser Torra and Alexandre Perera},
  journal = {Kidney International Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ekir.2026.107104},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2026.107104},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Improving the Diagnosis of Inherited Kidney Diseases Through Domain-Specific Databases
AU  - Rafael León
AU  - Leonor Fayos de Arizón
AU  - Elizabeth R. Viera
AU  - Joshua Llano Viles
AU  - Jordi Fonollosa
AU  - Mónica Furlano
AU  - Pedro Arango
AU  - Víctor López-Báez
AU  - Roser Torra
AU  - Alexandre Perera
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
JO  - Kidney International Reports
DO  - 10.1016/j.ekir.2026.107104
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2026.107104
AB  - Introduction: The diagnostic accuracy of phenotype-matching tools for rare diseases depends not only on the algorithm but also on the quality of the disease definitions. Inherited kidney diseases (IKDs) pose a significant challenge for clinical diagnosis due to substantial phenotypic overlap and heterogeneity, but many patients remain undiagnosed despite growing access to genetic testing. This study assesses whether an expert-curated, IKD-specific database (CURATED) provides a closer phenotypic match to real patients than the Mondo Disease Ontology (MONDO), a broad, general-purpose resource.  Methods: Using a cohort of 340 real-world patients with genetically confirmed diagnoses across 8 IKD categories, we compared MONDO- and CURATED-based disease definitions across 3 independent, computational phenotype-matching tools (Phenomizer, Phrank, and Phen2Disease), which match Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO)-annotated patient phenotypes to disease profiles, using similarity scoring, diagnostic ranking, and mixed-effects models accounting for disease imbalance and interannotator variability.  Results: With CURATED definitions, similarity scores rose by 18%–30% and Discounted Cumulative Gain (DCG) improved by 15%–37% relative to MONDO, reflecting a stronger tendency across all 3 tools to place the correct diagnosis at or near the top of the ranked list. These improvements were maintained after mixed-effects modeling.  Conclusion: The quality of the underlying disease database can be as consequential as the choice of diagnostic algorithm. In this cohort, domain-specific curation improved diagnostic prioritization, suggesting that investment in high-quality, nephrology-specific phenotype resources may advance IKD diagnosis as much as further algorithmic refinement.
SN  - 2468-0249
ER  -