Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Dynamically favorable hosts for submoons around Jupiter and Saturn

Abstract

The long-term stability of small bodies orbiting natural satellites (submoons) in the Solar System has been previously investigated using an analytical approximation of a three-body problem, focusing mainly on tidal forces and neglecting other perturbations. This approach suggests that submoons around most of the regular satellites in the Solar System could be stable. However, no such object has been detected to date. In this work, we extend these previous results by numerically testing the survival of submoons around a large number of satellites of Jupiter and Saturn. Our goal is to rank the satellites of Jupiter and Saturn according to how dynamically favorable they are for submoon survival over the simulated timescales. For each regular or irregular satellite considered, we performed 130 separate N-body integrations, each containing one hypothetical submoon with a different initial semimajor axis and inclination. From the 1 Myr survival fractions, we rank the satellites according to their dynamical favorability for submoon survival over the simulated timescale. We find that, after 1 Myr, the satellites with the highest survival fractions (above 30%) are Iapetus (≈ 37%), Titan (≈ 35%), Rhea (≈ 32%), Phoebe (30%), Callisto (≈ 34%), and Ganymede (30%). Rather than providing absolute probabilities for the existence of submoons, these survival fractions identify the most dynamically favorable hosts. Iapetus, Titan, Rhea, Phoebe, Callisto, and Ganymede are the most dynamically favorable submoon hosts among the tested satellites.

Versions

Related

  1. Self-consistent Evolution Models Show Weak Double-diffusive Mixing in Jupiter and Saturn
    J. R. Fuentes, Ankan Sur, David J. Stevenson +1
    The Astrophysical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlanetary science & exoplanetsCrossref
  2. Self-Consistent Evolution Models Show Weak Double-Diffusive Mixing in Jupiter and Saturn
    J. R. Fuentes, Ankan Sur, David J. Stevenson +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPlanetary science & exoplanetsSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  3. Limits on a Host Star around a Saturn-mass Free-floating Planet Candidate KMT-2024-BLG-0792/OGLE-2024-BLG-0516
    Przemek Mróz, Klara Piotrowska, Antoine Mérand +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  4. Seasonal Variation of Micrometeoroid Impacts and Dust Clouds around Saturn’s Rings
    Ian-Lin Lai, Wei-Ling Tseng, Hsiang-Wen Hsu +2
    The Planetary Science JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlanetary science & exoplanetsCrossref
  5. HD 210058 b and BD+37 4838 b: A precessing eccentric hot Jupiter and a misaligned substellar companion around two A-type stars
    Z. Balkóová, J. Žák, M. Skarka +8
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPlanetary science & exoplanetsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{dahoumane2026dynamically,
  title = {{Dynamically favorable hosts for submoons around Jupiter and Saturn}},
  author = {Ryan Dahoumane and Valéry Lainey and Kevin Baillié},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.03564},
  eprint = {2609.03564},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03564},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Dynamically favorable hosts for submoons around Jupiter and Saturn
AU  - Ryan Dahoumane
AU  - Valéry Lainey
AU  - Kevin Baillié
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.03564
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03564
AB  - The long-term stability of small bodies orbiting natural satellites (submoons) in the Solar System has been previously investigated using an analytical approximation of a three-body problem, focusing mainly on tidal forces and neglecting other perturbations. This approach suggests that submoons around most of the regular satellites in the Solar System could be stable. However, no such object has been detected to date. In this work, we extend these previous results by numerically testing the survival of submoons around a large number of satellites of Jupiter and Saturn. Our goal is to rank the satellites of Jupiter and Saturn according to how dynamically favorable they are for submoon survival over the simulated timescales. For each regular or irregular satellite considered, we performed 130 separate N-body integrations, each containing one hypothetical submoon with a different initial semimajor axis and inclination. From the 1 Myr survival fractions, we rank the satellites according to their dynamical favorability for submoon survival over the simulated timescale. We find that, after 1 Myr, the satellites with the highest survival fractions (above 30%) are Iapetus (≈ 37%), Titan (≈ 35%), Rhea (≈ 32%), Phoebe (30%), Callisto (≈ 34%), and Ganymede (30%). Rather than providing absolute probabilities for the existence of submoons, these survival fractions identify the most dynamically favorable hosts. Iapetus, Titan, Rhea, Phoebe, Callisto, and Ganymede are the most dynamically favorable submoon hosts among the tested satellites.
ER  -