Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Spectral origin of the topological gap exponent d + η: mechanism, kernel, decomposition, and scope

Abstract

The topological gap Δ -- the excess H1 total persistence of a critical point cloud over a density-matched null -- scales as Δ∼ Ld+η. We derive this analytically: the spectral integral I(α) = ∑k≠ 0 Sconn(k) |k|α scales as L2−α−η when IR-dominated, giving I(−2η) ∼ Ld+η. The decomposition I(−2η) = I0 · Ishape separates volume (I0 ∝ N(1−m2) ∼ Ld) from anomalous dimension (Ishape ∼ Lη); the volume factor accounts for the magnetization-driven per-configuration variance of Δ. We prove the mechanism requires d < 2 + η (IR dominance), confining it to d = 2 for physical systems; in d = 3 the spectral integral is UV-dominated, explaining why density normalization is needed. An α-sweep for Potts q = 4 at L = 32--$256$ finds αopt in $[-0.75, -0.5]$, consistent with −2ηIsing and inconsistent with −2ηq=4 = −1; we flag this as tentative pending L ≥ 1024 confirmation. The ⟨ m2 · I(−2η)⟩ hyperscaling product is dominated by the correlation r(m2, I) ≈ −0.98 via the shared I0 amplitude, so we report it as a covariance-correction analysis. Under a heuristic argument extending Divol--Polonik to inhomogeneous Poisson intensities, the bare PH kernel is flat; the effective kernel acquires k-dependence only at criticality. The per-configuration agreement between Δ and I(−0.5) is primarily a magnetization correlation: R2 = 0.91 at L = 256 collapses to R2 ≈ 0 once |M| is partialed out. Per-configuration evidence corroborates the I0 Parseval identity but not the |k|−2η shape factor; the latter is established by ensemble L-scaling.

Related

  1. χ‑Spectral Reconstruction of the Klein Paradox: Operator‑Topological Origin of χ‑Current in Strong Fields
    Anatolii Mukha
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)PreprintCC BY11 citedMathematical physicsOpenAlex
  2. Shintani Cocycle Decomposition of Topological Polylogarithms for Totally Real Fields
    Julio de Mello Bezerra
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. A Direct Polynomial Approach to Spectral Decomposition
    Simon Bossoney, Marc Troyanov
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. A Decomposition Theorem for Topological Semi-small Maps
    Shahryar Ghaed Sharaf
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. Decomposition Atlases of Brains and Kidneys from Postmortem CT: Shape and Topological Data Analysis
    Yanyan Zhan, Yuexuan Wu, Ian L. Dryden +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{loftus2026spectral,
  title = {{Spectral origin of the topological gap exponent d + η: mechanism, kernel, decomposition, and scope}},
  author = {Matthew Loftus},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.09159},
  eprint = {2609.09159},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09159},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Spectral origin of the topological gap exponent d + η: mechanism, kernel, decomposition, and scope
AU  - Matthew Loftus
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.09159
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09159
AB  - The topological gap Δ -- the excess H_1 total persistence of a critical point cloud over a density-matched null -- scales as Δ∼ L^d+η. We derive this analytically: the spectral integral I(α) = ∑_k≠ 0 S_conn(k) |k|^α scales as L^2−α−η when IR-dominated, giving I(−2η) ∼ L^d+η. The decomposition I(−2η) = I_0 · I_shape separates volume (I_0 ∝ N(1−m^2) ∼ L^d) from anomalous dimension (I_shape ∼ L^η); the volume factor accounts for the magnetization-driven per-configuration variance of Δ. We prove the mechanism requires d < 2 + η (IR dominance), confining it to d = 2 for physical systems; in d = 3 the spectral integral is UV-dominated, explaining why density normalization is needed. An α-sweep for Potts q = 4 at L = 32--$256$ finds α_opt in $[-0.75, -0.5]$, consistent with −2η_Ising and inconsistent with −2η_q=4 = −1; we flag this as tentative pending L ≥ 1024 confirmation. The ⟨ m^2 · I(−2η)⟩ hyperscaling product is dominated by the correlation r(m^2, I) ≈ −0.98 via the shared I_0 amplitude, so we report it as a covariance-correction analysis. Under a heuristic argument extending Divol--Polonik to inhomogeneous Poisson intensities, the bare PH kernel is flat; the effective kernel acquires k-dependence only at criticality. The per-configuration agreement between Δ and I(−0.5) is primarily a magnetization correlation: R^2 = 0.91 at L = 256 collapses to R^2 ≈ 0 once |M| is partialed out. Per-configuration evidence corroborates the I_0 Parseval identity but not the |k|^−2η shape factor; the latter is established by ensemble L-scaling.
ER  -