Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Selective Inference for CART with Binary Outcomes

Abstract

Binary classification trees select subgroups using the same outcomes later used to assess their differences. We develop finite-sample conditional tests of a common success probability within a parent selected by deterministic Gini CART. The construction retains all eligible cutpoints and conditions on the selected split, its ancestor path, the parent success total, and outside outcomes. The resulting uniform label fiber gives an exact count distribution, while a reversible parallel Monte Carlo construction yields super-uniform inclusive and exactly uniform tie-randomized p-values for any prespecified finite run budget. Within a two-child constant-risk model, the selected count law is an exponential family with information equal to its conditional count variance. We separate information loss from computational limitations and exhibit a selected fiber disconnected under single-label swaps. Simulations with 200 or 400 observations, ten independent or correlated predictors, and trees of depth three show conservative inclusive tests and nontrivial power for large risk differences. At 400 observations and a generating risk difference of 0.4, randomized rejection conditional on reaching the prespecified third-level target is 51--71\%, while selection followed by rejection occurs in 11--21\% of datasets. Smaller signals remain difficult to detect, and a representative fivefold increase in computation gives little power improvement. The guarantee concerns parent homogeneity, or equality of two constant child risks, and does not cover equality of heterogeneous regional averages.

Related

  1. Randomization Inference for Matched Pairs with Binary Outcomes
    Bob Wilson
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Selective Randomization Inference for Interference
    Takahide Yanagi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Distributed Selective Inference for Quantile Regression
    Xiaohui Yuan, Jiahan Teng, Yan Zhou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Selective Inference in Growth Curve Models
    Haochen Lei, Qian Zhang, Hongyuan Cao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Selective Inference for Clustering Under Unknown Covariance
    Yiqun T. Chen, Lucy L. Gao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{nakamura2026selective,
  title = {{Selective Inference for CART with Binary Outcomes}},
  author = {Tomoshige Nakamura},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.24949},
  eprint = {2609.24949},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24949},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Selective Inference for CART with Binary Outcomes
AU  - Tomoshige Nakamura
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.24949
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24949
AB  - Binary classification trees select subgroups using the same outcomes later used to assess their differences. We develop finite-sample conditional tests of a common success probability within a parent selected by deterministic Gini CART. The construction retains all eligible cutpoints and conditions on the selected split, its ancestor path, the parent success total, and outside outcomes. The resulting uniform label fiber gives an exact count distribution, while a reversible parallel Monte Carlo construction yields super-uniform inclusive and exactly uniform tie-randomized p-values for any prespecified finite run budget. Within a two-child constant-risk model, the selected count law is an exponential family with information equal to its conditional count variance. We separate information loss from computational limitations and exhibit a selected fiber disconnected under single-label swaps. Simulations with 200 or 400 observations, ten independent or correlated predictors, and trees of depth three show conservative inclusive tests and nontrivial power for large risk differences. At 400 observations and a generating risk difference of 0.4, randomized rejection conditional on reaching the prespecified third-level target is 51--71\%, while selection followed by rejection occurs in 11--21\% of datasets. Smaller signals remain difficult to detect, and a representative fivefold increase in computation gives little power improvement. The guarantee concerns parent homogeneity, or equality of two constant child risks, and does not cover equality of heterogeneous regional averages.
ER  -