Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
PreprintCC BY 4.0EarthArXiv

Role of Topo-Climatic Factors in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Machine Learning Perspective

Abstract

With the rapid growth of machine learning (ML) applications in landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM), many studies have relied on large and diverse datasets to improve predictive performance. However, in data-scarce regions, model transferability becomes challenging, and not all input variables contribute meaningful information to landslide prediction, leading to the well-known problem of “garbage in, garbage out”. Therefore, careful selection of physically meaningful predictors is essential. In this study, we develop a Random Forest–based framework for landslide mapping using topographic and climatic factors only as inputs. Notably, the model incorporates effective rainfall (ER), derived from a process-based hydrological model, and a recently proposed topographic metric, topographic source density (D_ts), that were not used in previous LSM studies. Results demonstrate that incorporating these predictors substantially improves model performance, achieving a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.972. Overall, the findings suggest that a physically meaningful machine learning approach can reliably predict regional landslide susceptibility.

Related

  1. Machine-learning modelling of regional landslide susceptibility in eThekwini, South Africa
    Cher Petersen, Paidamwoyo Mhangara, Laven Naidoo +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  2. Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning models and analytical hierarchy process along NH-513, Pasighat to Yingkiong, Arunachal Pradesh, India
    Mrinaljyoti Adhyapok, Mrinal Kumar Dutta
    Discover GeosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  3. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Western Ghats adjoining Idukki township, Kerala, India, using integrated geomorphological and geotechnical parameters with AHP and machine learning
    Arjun Sandeep P, Anoop S, Anju S S +1
    Discover GeosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  4. Landslide Susceptibility Modelling and Infrastructure Exposure in the Zillertal, Austrian Alps
    Anna Lisa Marie Meiffert, Noah Schreiber
    EarthArXivPreprintPublisher termsFull textGeology & geochemistryEarthArXiv
  5. Landslide Susceptibility Modeling and Mapping: A Comparison of Frequency Ratio and Decision Tree Models
    Raghvendra Kumar, Nguyễn Thanh Tuấn
    Journal of Science and Transport TechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{raina2026role,
  title = {{Role of Topo-Climatic Factors in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Machine Learning Perspective}},
  author = {Saba Shakeel Raina and Basudev Biswal},
  howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31223/x5hc0v},
  url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15828/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Role of Topo-Climatic Factors in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Machine Learning Perspective
AU  - Saba Shakeel Raina
AU  - Basudev Biswal
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - EarthArXiv
DO  - 10.31223/x5hc0v
UR  - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15828/
AB  - With the rapid growth of machine learning (ML) applications in landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM), many studies have relied on large and diverse datasets to improve predictive performance. However, in data-scarce regions, model transferability becomes challenging, and not all input variables contribute meaningful information to landslide prediction, leading to the well-known problem of “garbage in, garbage out”. Therefore, careful selection of physically meaningful predictors is essential. In this study, we develop a Random Forest–based framework for landslide mapping using topographic and climatic factors only as inputs. Notably, the model incorporates effective rainfall (ER), derived from a process-based hydrological model, and a recently proposed topographic metric, topographic source density (D_ts), that were not used in previous LSM studies. Results demonstrate that incorporating these predictors substantially improves model performance, achieving a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.972. Overall, the findings suggest that a physically meaningful machine learning approach can reliably predict regional landslide susceptibility.
ER  -