Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Effects of Mothers of Rotterdam on self-sufficiency and stress in vulnerable pregnant women

Abstract

Background: Low socioeconomic status and disadvantaged circumstances lead to suboptimal health and well-being of individuals. These health effects are already visible at birth, with long-lasting effects in childhood and later life, making them a double victim of poverty. In Rotterdam, 12.8% of households have a low income and 14.3% of children grow up in poverty. The Mothers of Rotterdam (MoR) program, provides (Targeted) Social Care (TSC) across multiple domains to highly vulnerable pregnant women aiming to support them and their children. This study assesses the effects of the program on stress and self-sufficiency in participating women.

Methods: Between 2016 and 2021, 868 women participated in MoR. Data on self-sufficiency (measured by the Self-Sufficiency scale) and stress (measured by the DASS-21) were used to assess change in both outcomes between start and end of care. Additionally, regression models were used to assess the influence of type of care (TSC vs care as usual), scores at the start and degree of vulnerability on the change in outcomes.

Results: Care trajectories lasted on average 414 days for TSC and 224 days for care as usual. Self-sufficiency scores improved from 43 at baseline to 47, and stress scores improved from 28 at baseline to 16 at end of care. Baseline scores were significantly associated with improvements in both outcomes, irrespective of type of care. Higher vulnerability at baseline was associated with larger reductions in stress, while lower baseline vulnerability was associated with greater improvements in self-sufficiency.

Conclusions: Self-sufficiency and stress improved for all women in the study. No significant difference was found in these outcomes by type of care, despite the longer trajectory of TSC. This could be explained by changes in application for social care and recognition of pregnant women as a priority population, which applied to both types of social care.

Key messages: • Pregnant women in vulnerable positions receiving social care show improvement in self-sufficiency and stress. No significant difference was found in these outcomes by type of care.

• No added effect in targeted social care could be due a change in application for social care and recognition of pregnant women as a priority population, which applies to both types of social care.

Related

  1. Health-Promoting lifestyle practices and associated factors among pregnant mothers in Muhir Aklil Woreda of Central Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study
    Niguse Tilahun, Shimelis Tadesse, Shambel Negese +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Relationship between emotional indices and post-traumatic stress disorder in mothers with unsuccessful pregnancy
    Shokofeh Sharifi Hossein Abadi, Farkhondeh Sharif, Arash Mani +2
    BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  3. Effect of MOHO-based occupational therapy techniques on stress, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and occupational performance among mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder
    PUNITHA P, Shanthi Nambi, Raman K +3
    Journal of Associated Medical SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. The role of oxidative balance in the early diagnosis of oxidative stress-related diseases in infants born to mothers with preeclampsia
    İzel Kutlu Can, Sema Tanrıverdi, Fatma Taneli
    Frontiers in PediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsDOAJ
  5. Understanding anxiety disorders among Iranian mothers and their children exposed to conflict using an extended transactional model of stress and coping
    Nie Ni, Zahra Osati, Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh +2
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{varmamohabier2026effects,
  title = {{Effects of Mothers of Rotterdam on self-sufficiency and stress in vulnerable pregnant women}},
  author = {KSC Oedayrajsingh Varma-Mohabier and Q Van de Stadt and J P De Graaf and EAP Steegers and LCM Bertens},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1708},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1708},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effects of Mothers of Rotterdam on self-sufficiency and stress in vulnerable pregnant women
AU  - KSC Oedayrajsingh Varma-Mohabier
AU  - Q Van de Stadt
AU  - J P De Graaf
AU  - EAP Steegers
AU  - LCM Bertens
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1708
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1708
AB  - Background: Low socioeconomic status and disadvantaged circumstances lead to suboptimal health and well-being of individuals. These health effects are already visible at birth, with long-lasting effects in childhood and later life, making them a double victim of poverty. In Rotterdam, 12.8% of households have a low income and 14.3% of children grow up in poverty. The Mothers of Rotterdam (MoR) program, provides (Targeted) Social Care (TSC) across multiple domains to highly vulnerable pregnant women aiming to support them and their children. This study assesses the effects of the program on stress and self-sufficiency in participating women.  Methods: Between 2016 and 2021, 868 women participated in MoR. Data on self-sufficiency (measured by the Self-Sufficiency scale) and stress (measured by the DASS-21) were used to assess change in both outcomes between start and end of care. Additionally, regression models were used to assess the influence of type of care (TSC vs care as usual), scores at the start and degree of vulnerability on the change in outcomes.  Results: Care trajectories lasted on average 414 days for TSC and 224 days for care as usual. Self-sufficiency scores improved from 43 at baseline to 47, and stress scores improved from 28 at baseline to 16 at end of care. Baseline scores were significantly associated with improvements in both outcomes, irrespective of type of care. Higher vulnerability at baseline was associated with larger reductions in stress, while lower baseline vulnerability was associated with greater improvements in self-sufficiency.  Conclusions: Self-sufficiency and stress improved for all women in the study. No significant difference was found in these outcomes by type of care, despite the longer trajectory of TSC. This could be explained by changes in application for social care and recognition of pregnant women as a priority population, which applied to both types of social care.  Key messages: • Pregnant women in vulnerable positions receiving social care show improvement in self-sufficiency and stress. No significant difference was found in these outcomes by type of care.  • No added effect in targeted social care could be due a change in application for social care and recognition of pregnant women as a priority population, which applies to both types of social care.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -