Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,332 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in public health

Gender equality and disease burden in 25 EU member states, 2006–2023: a fixed-effects panel analysis

  1. 1Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, Kristiania University of Applied Sciences , ,
  2. 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University , ,

Abstract

Background: Gender equality is widely regarded as a social determinant of population health, but most evidence is cross-sectional or based on differences between countries. Whether within-country changes in gender equality are associated with the magnitude or composition of disease burden remains unclear, particularly in high-income settings.

Objective: To examine whether within-country changes in gender equality, measured by the Global Gender Gap Index (GGGI), were associated with age-standardized all-cause disease-burden magnitude and mortality–morbidity composition in 25 EU member states from 2006 to 2023.

Methods: This ecological longitudinal study used country-level panel data from 25 EU member states, yielding 450 country-year observations. The GGGI was linked to Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 estimates of age-standardized DALY, YLL, and YLD rates and the YLL/YLD ratio. The main models were two-way fixed-effects regressions with country and year fixed effects, country-clustered standard errors, and adjustment for log GDP per capita, log health expenditure per capita, and mean years of schooling. Robustness was assessed using wild cluster bootstrap-t inference, Mundlak within–between decomposition, restriction to the pre-pandemic period, and alternative education and macroeconomic specifications.

Results: Within-country changes in the GGGI were not significantly associated with the two primary summary outcomes: the age-standardized total DALY rate (β = −19.1 per 0.01 increase; p = 0.575) or the YLL/YLD ratio (β = −0.0026; p = 0.296). The same null pattern was observed for YLL, YLD, and sex-specific outcomes. The conclusions were unchanged across robustness and sensitivity analyses. A negative cross-country gradient did not persist after adjustment, and within- and between-country coefficients could not be statistically distinguished.

Conclusions: In high-income EU countries between 2006 and 2023, within-country changes in gender equality were not detectably associated with all-cause age-standardized disease burden or the YLL/YLD ratio. This does not imply that gender equality is unrelated to population health. Rather, broad parity indicators may be too general or slow-moving to register in all-cause burden over this time horizon. Future research should link specific gender-equality domains to disease-specific, sex-specific, health-system-sensitive, and longer-lag outcomes.

Related

  1. Gender-based violence rates and mental health disease burden in India, 2001-2021: A state-level ecological study
    S. Sangekar, G. Baranyi, J. B. Kirkbride +1
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Burden of Pancreatitis in the United States from 1990 to 2023: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023
    Murali Mohan Rama Krishna Reddy, Anish Chopra, Ganesh Aswath +9
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Access to and control over water security: The perspective of gender equality in Lao PDR
    Souksamone Thongmixay, Vanphanom Sychareun, Viengnakhone Vongxay +7
    PLOS WaterPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceHydrology & soilsPLOS
  4. Working conditions, career barriers and perceived equity among neuro-oncology professionals: insights from the Japan society for neuro-oncology (JSNO) gender equality and diversity committee survey
    Akiko Higuchi, Kaoru Tamura, Yuko Watanabe +7
    International Journal of Clinical OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Burden, Risk Factors, and Temporal Trends of Ovarian Cancer in Postmenopausal Women Aged 55 Years and Older: A Comparative Analysis in India, China, and the United States Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.
    Ting Wei, Hui Zheng, Yuqing Pei +6
    International journal of women's healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{kisa2026gender,
  title = {{Gender equality and disease burden in 25 EU member states, 2006–2023: a fixed-effects panel analysis}},
  author = {Adnan Kisa and Sezer Kisa},
  journal = {Frontiers in public health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1950297},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13668557},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Gender equality and disease burden in 25 EU member states, 2006–2023: a fixed-effects panel analysis
AU  - Adnan Kisa
AU  - Sezer Kisa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Frontiers in public health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1950297
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13668557
AB  - Background: Gender equality is widely regarded as a social determinant of population health, but most evidence is cross-sectional or based on differences between countries. Whether within-country changes in gender equality are associated with the magnitude or composition of disease burden remains unclear, particularly in high-income settings.  Objective: To examine whether within-country changes in gender equality, measured by the Global Gender Gap Index (GGGI), were associated with age-standardized all-cause disease-burden magnitude and mortality–morbidity composition in 25 EU member states from 2006 to 2023.  Methods: This ecological longitudinal study used country-level panel data from 25 EU member states, yielding 450 country-year observations. The GGGI was linked to Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 estimates of age-standardized DALY, YLL, and YLD rates and the YLL/YLD ratio. The main models were two-way fixed-effects regressions with country and year fixed effects, country-clustered standard errors, and adjustment for log GDP per capita, log health expenditure per capita, and mean years of schooling. Robustness was assessed using wild cluster bootstrap-t inference, Mundlak within–between decomposition, restriction to the pre-pandemic period, and alternative education and macroeconomic specifications.  Results: Within-country changes in the GGGI were not significantly associated with the two primary summary outcomes: the age-standardized total DALY rate (β = −19.1 per 0.01 increase; p = 0.575) or the YLL/YLD ratio (β = −0.0026; p = 0.296). The same null pattern was observed for YLL, YLD, and sex-specific outcomes. The conclusions were unchanged across robustness and sensitivity analyses. A negative cross-country gradient did not persist after adjustment, and within- and between-country coefficients could not be statistically distinguished.  Conclusions: In high-income EU countries between 2006 and 2023, within-country changes in gender equality were not detectably associated with all-cause age-standardized disease burden or the YLL/YLD ratio. This does not imply that gender equality is unrelated to population health. Rather, broad parity indicators may be too general or slow-moving to register in all-cause burden over this time horizon. Future research should link specific gender-equality domains to disease-specific, sex-specific, health-system-sensitive, and longer-lag outcomes.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -