Histopathology Versus Imaging: A Comparative Study of Liver Biopsy, Ultrasonography, and Triphasic Computed Tomography in Paediatric Patients With Chronic Liver Disease.
- 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Center, Lahore, PAK.
- 2Department of Paediatric and Child Health, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Center, Lahore, PAK.
- 3Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Center, Lahore, PAK.
Abstract
Background
Assessment of liver fibrosis and cirrhotic changes in children with chronic liver disease (CLD) can be challenging, particularly when invasive assessment is limited by clinical factors. This study compared ultrasonography and triphasic computed tomography (CT) findings with histopathology in paediatric patients with CLD.Aim
The aim of the study is to compare ultrasonography and triphasic CT findings with liver biopsy findings in paediatric patients with CLD and to assess their concordance with histopathology using predefined study-specific categories of good, partial, and poor agreement.Materials and methods
A prospective analytical observational study was conducted at the Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Gastroenterology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Center, Lahore, from April 10, 2026 to July 10, 2026. A total of 100 children aged 0-15 years with CLD or decompensated CLD were included. Clinical, biochemical, ultrasonographic, triphasic CT, and liver biopsy findings were recorded. Histopathology was used as the reference standard. Agreement analysis was performed in patients with adequate biopsy samples using predefined study-specific criteria. Paired binary comparisons were assessed using the McNemar test, while the Bowker test was used for comparison across the three agreement categories. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results
Liver biopsy was performed in 93 patients, with adequate biopsy samples obtained in 90 patients. Among patients with adequate biopsy samples, 81/90 (90%) had F3 or F4 fibrosis. Good agreement with histopathology was observed more frequently with triphasic CT than with ultrasonography (59/90 versus 17/90, p < 0.001). Good or partial agreement was also higher with triphasic CT than with ultrasonography (83/90 versus 61/90, p < 0.001).Conclusion
Triphasic CT demonstrated greater concordance with histopathology than ultrasonography in this predominantly advanced CLD cohort. These findings mainly reflect the assessment of advanced fibrosis and cirrhotic changes and should not be extrapolated to early-stage disease. Triphasic CT may provide complementary structural information, while liver biopsy remains necessary when definitive histological diagnosis or fibrosis staging is required.
Related
- Two parallel systems constructed from complementary optical coherence tomography and histopathology for the assessment of murine intestinal inflammation: a dual-modality assessment
- Morphological and vascular assessment of mandibular nutrient foramina using cone beam computed tomography and Color Doppler ultrasonography
- Potentially avoidable computed tomography after positive ultrasonography in appendicitis
- AI-powered optical coherence tomography shows similar performance to intravascular ultrasound for plaque burden quantification: head-to-head benchmark study against histopathology of native coronary arteries.
- Comparative micro-computed tomography assessment of left-sided septal pouch and left atrial appendage morphometry
BibTeX
@article{karim2026histopathology,
title = {{Histopathology Versus Imaging: A Comparative Study of Liver Biopsy, Ultrasonography, and Triphasic Computed Tomography in Paediatric Patients With Chronic Liver Disease.}},
author = {Filza Karim and Faraz Hussain and Heebah Shabbir and Sobia Naureen and Iqtadar Seerat},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.116694},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923597},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Histopathology Versus Imaging: A Comparative Study of Liver Biopsy, Ultrasonography, and Triphasic Computed Tomography in Paediatric Patients With Chronic Liver Disease.
AU - Filza Karim
AU - Faraz Hussain
AU - Heebah Shabbir
AU - Sobia Naureen
AU - Iqtadar Seerat
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/21
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.116694
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923597
AB - Background Assessment of liver fibrosis and cirrhotic changes in children with chronic liver disease (CLD) can be challenging, particularly when invasive assessment is limited by clinical factors. This study compared ultrasonography and triphasic computed tomography (CT) findings with histopathology in paediatric patients with CLD.Aim The aim of the study is to compare ultrasonography and triphasic CT findings with liver biopsy findings in paediatric patients with CLD and to assess their concordance with histopathology using predefined study-specific categories of good, partial, and poor agreement.Materials and methods A prospective analytical observational study was conducted at the Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Gastroenterology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Center, Lahore, from April 10, 2026 to July 10, 2026. A total of 100 children aged 0-15 years with CLD or decompensated CLD were included. Clinical, biochemical, ultrasonographic, triphasic CT, and liver biopsy findings were recorded. Histopathology was used as the reference standard. Agreement analysis was performed in patients with adequate biopsy samples using predefined study-specific criteria. Paired binary comparisons were assessed using the McNemar test, while the Bowker test was used for comparison across the three agreement categories. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results Liver biopsy was performed in 93 patients, with adequate biopsy samples obtained in 90 patients. Among patients with adequate biopsy samples, 81/90 (90%) had F3 or F4 fibrosis. Good agreement with histopathology was observed more frequently with triphasic CT than with ultrasonography (59/90 versus 17/90, p < 0.001). Good or partial agreement was also higher with triphasic CT than with ultrasonography (83/90 versus 61/90, p < 0.001).Conclusion Triphasic CT demonstrated greater concordance with histopathology than ultrasonography in this predominantly advanced CLD cohort. These findings mainly reflect the assessment of advanced fibrosis and cirrhotic changes and should not be extrapolated to early-stage disease. Triphasic CT may provide complementary structural information, while liver biopsy remains necessary when definitive histological diagnosis or fibrosis staging is required.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -