Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,783 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Semantic Cognition for and from Language Models

Abstract

The success of neural network language models (LMs) at showing semantically sophisticated behavior raises questions about the extent to which they are compatible with human conceptual knowledge, and if they can perhaps also advance our understanding of semantic cognition. This brief opinion explores this potentially bidirectional connection between LMs and semantic cognition. Specifically, I review a range of methodology used to establish the structure and the function of conceptual knowledge in LMs, primarily inspired by the semantic cognition literature. I then summarize three possible ways that future work could take to make contributions in the opposite direction, by using insights from language models to make conclusions about the language-based origin and mechanisms of human semantic cognition.

Related

  1. Assessing the Impact of Language on Visual Threat Detection: cTBS over the anterior temporal lobe impairs semantic processing but not visual threat detection
    Adam Fahmi, Nicola Thibault, Roxane Hoyer +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  2. It's a small world of signs: Semantic network structure in American Sign Language based on free associations
    Zed Sehyr, Karen Emmorey, Elana Pontecorvo +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  3. From eco-affective narrowing to agency: acceptance, externalization, and efficacy in climate-related cognition
    Paolo Raile
    Frontiers in cognitionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  4. Nonverbal Cognition is Associated with Discourse Production in Persons with Aphasia: Evidence from Expository and Picture Description Tasks
    Hana Kim, Manaswita Dutta
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  5. Mathematics Anxiety Is Associated With Attentional and Memory‐Related Neural Activity During Numerical Cognition
    Simge Altınok, Sertaç Üstün, Kevser Aktaş +2
    PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{misra2026semantic,
  title = {{Semantic Cognition for and from Language Models}},
  author = {Kanishka Misra},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/gn4ch_v3},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/gn4ch_v3/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Semantic Cognition for and from Language Models
AU  - Kanishka Misra
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/gn4ch_v3
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/gn4ch_v3/
AB  - The success of neural network language models (LMs) at showing semantically sophisticated behavior raises questions about the extent to which they are compatible with human conceptual knowledge, and if they can perhaps also advance our understanding of semantic cognition. This brief opinion explores this potentially bidirectional connection between LMs and semantic cognition. Specifically, I review a range of methodology used to establish the structure and the function of conceptual knowledge in LMs, primarily inspired by the semantic cognition literature. I then summarize three possible ways that future work could take to make contributions in the opposite direction, by using insights from language models to make conclusions about the language-based origin and mechanisms of human semantic cognition.
ER  -