Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Accessory Apical Foramina in Mandibular Second Molars with Mesial and Distal Root Canal Systems: An Ex Vivo Micro-CT Morphometric Study

  1. 1Department of Endodontics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy

Abstract

Background: The apical anatomy of mandibular second molars may include accessory foramina not adequately represented by classifications of the main root canal configuration. This ex vivo micro-computed tomographic study evaluated the frequency, number, and two-dimensional perimeter of accessory apical foramina associated with independent mesial and distal canal systems. Methods: Sixty-four extracted mandibular second molars were selected, including teeth with completely separate roots and teeth with partial external root fusion, provided that the mesial and distal canal systems remained independent and terminated in distinct main foramina. Mesial systems were stratified by Vertucci configuration as Type I (n = 21), Type II (n = 21), and Type IV (n = 22), whereas all distal systems were Type I. Specimens were scanned at an isotropic voxel size of 10.98 μm. Accessory apical foramina were defined as openings distinct from the main apical foramen or foramina that were continuous with the canal system and communicated with the external root surface. Mesial and distal systems were compared using paired analyses. Results: Accessory apical foramina were detected in 42/64 mesial systems (65.6%) and 21/64 distal systems (32.8%). Their frequency was significantly higher in mesial systems. Overall, 152 accessory foramina were identified in mesial systems and 66 in distal systems, with significantly higher paired counts mesially (p = 0.0002). Among the 15 teeth presenting accessory apical foramina in both the mesial and distal canal systems, the mean number of accessory foramina was similar between the two systems, whereas distal accessory foramina had a larger mean two-dimensional perimeter. Mesial Vertucci configuration was not significantly associated with their presence or number. Conclusions: Accessory apical foramina occurred frequently, particularly in mesial canal systems. Main canal configuration did not fully represent apical foraminal complexity, emphasizing the importance of cleaning, disinfection, and obturation of the entire apical canal system. Because the sample was deliberately stratified by mesial canal configuration, the reported frequencies characterize the selected sample and should not be interpreted as population prevalence estimates.

Related

  1. Morphological and vascular assessment of mandibular nutrient foramina using cone beam computed tomography and Color Doppler ultrasonography
    Menduh Sercan Kaya, Mehmet Emin Doğan, Sedef Kotanlı
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefDOAJ
  2. Intra-operative neuromonitoring and electrophysiological nerve stimulation for the spinal accessory and marginal mandibular nerve during neck dissection: a scoping review
    Aditya Singh, James Heyman, David Owens
    The Journal of Laryngology and OtologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  3. C-Shaped Root Canal Morphology in Mandibular Posterior Teeth-A Retrospective CBCT Study Based on Two Classification Systems.
    Mubashir Baig Mirza, Abdulaziz Abdulwahed, Abdullah AlShehri +7
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Quintuple Mental Foramina: A Rare Anatomical Variant Identified by High‐Resolution Cone Beam Computed Tomography—A Case Report
    Joul Kassis
    Clinical Case ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Electrophysiological characteristics of atypical "node-like" accessory pathway in the aortomitral continuity: A case series.
    Ishika Gupta, Nayani Makkar, Naveenkumar Nallathambi +1
    HeartRhythm case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{greco2026accessory,
  title = {{Accessory Apical Foramina in Mandibular Second Molars with Mesial and Distal Root Canal Systems: An Ex Vivo Micro-CT Morphometric Study}},
  author = {Katia Greco and Riccardo Federico Visconti and Maria Teresa Sberna and Enrico Felice Gherlone and Giuseppe Cantatore},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15197659},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/19/7659},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Accessory Apical Foramina in Mandibular Second Molars with Mesial and Distal Root Canal Systems: An Ex Vivo Micro-CT Morphometric Study
AU  - Katia Greco
AU  - Riccardo Federico Visconti
AU  - Maria Teresa Sberna
AU  - Enrico Felice Gherlone
AU  - Giuseppe Cantatore
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15197659
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/19/7659
AB  - Background: The apical anatomy of mandibular second molars may include accessory foramina not adequately represented by classifications of the main root canal configuration. This ex vivo micro-computed tomographic study evaluated the frequency, number, and two-dimensional perimeter of accessory apical foramina associated with independent mesial and distal canal systems. Methods: Sixty-four extracted mandibular second molars were selected, including teeth with completely separate roots and teeth with partial external root fusion, provided that the mesial and distal canal systems remained independent and terminated in distinct main foramina. Mesial systems were stratified by Vertucci configuration as Type I (n = 21), Type II (n = 21), and Type IV (n = 22), whereas all distal systems were Type I. Specimens were scanned at an isotropic voxel size of 10.98 μm. Accessory apical foramina were defined as openings distinct from the main apical foramen or foramina that were continuous with the canal system and communicated with the external root surface. Mesial and distal systems were compared using paired analyses. Results: Accessory apical foramina were detected in 42/64 mesial systems (65.6%) and 21/64 distal systems (32.8%). Their frequency was significantly higher in mesial systems. Overall, 152 accessory foramina were identified in mesial systems and 66 in distal systems, with significantly higher paired counts mesially (p = 0.0002). Among the 15 teeth presenting accessory apical foramina in both the mesial and distal canal systems, the mean number of accessory foramina was similar between the two systems, whereas distal accessory foramina had a larger mean two-dimensional perimeter. Mesial Vertucci configuration was not significantly associated with their presence or number. Conclusions: Accessory apical foramina occurred frequently, particularly in mesial canal systems. Main canal configuration did not fully represent apical foraminal complexity, emphasizing the importance of cleaning, disinfection, and obturation of the entire apical canal system. Because the sample was deliberately stratified by mesial canal configuration, the reported frequencies characterize the selected sample and should not be interpreted as population prevalence estimates.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -